Qube Logistics (SB) PTY LTD T/A Qube Logistics

Case [2018] FWCA 4528


[2018] FWCA 4528
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qube Logistics (SB) PTY LTD T/A Qube Logistics
(AG2018/1433)

QUBE LOGISTICS (NSW) - ROAD TRANSPORT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Road transport industry

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 2 AUGUST 2018

Application for approval of the Qube Logistics (NSW) - Road Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Logistics (NSW) - Road Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qube Logistics (SB) PTY LTD T/A Qube Logistics. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings have been agreed to by the bargaining representatives. I am also satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are accepted and will now be taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[3] I am otherwise satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually lodged.

[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The Applicant also advised that the Agreement that was lodged when the application was made contained some minor errors in clauses 2, 12.1.1 and 22.3.2. In addition, it did not contain the classification definitions found in clause 1.1.2 of the Transport Industry State Award (NSW) as stated in clause 10.1 of the Agreement. It accordingly requested that the Commission exercise the discretion available to it under s.586(a) of the Act to allow a correction or amendment to the Agreement so that it reads as actually intended. It is understood that this request has also been made known to the bargaining representatives and they do not object to what is being proposed.

[8] I am satisfied that it is appropriate for the Commission to exercise the discretion available to it to correct the Agreement in the manner proposed on the basis that these corrections are minor in nature only, and simply ensure that the Agreement accurately reflects what was agreed to by the parties and approved by the employees who voted to approve the Agreement.

[9] The Applicant has provided a revised copy of the Agreement that contains these corrections. It will now be published on the Commission’s website in place of the copy of the Agreement that was submitted to the Commission at the time the application was made.

[10] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia and Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[11] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 August 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 June 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE429398  PR609621>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Qube Logistics (SB) PTY LTD T/A Qube Logistics [2018] FWCA 4528
Case
[2018] FWCA 4528
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Qube Logistics (SB) Pty Ltd, trading as Qube Logistics, applied for the approval of the Qube Logistics (NSW) – Road Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017 under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was opposed by the Transport Workers Union of Australia (TWU). The dispute centred on the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed agreement, with the TWU arguing that certain provisions did not meet the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission.

The primary legal issues for determination by the Fair Work Commission were whether the provisions of the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the legislative requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically sections 231 and 232. Section 231 mandates that an agreement must not have an adverse financial effect on employees, while section 232 requires that an agreement must be in writing and signed by the employer and the registered union. The TWU contended that several provisions in the agreement contravened these sections.

In rendering its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the terms of the proposed agreement, focusing on the provisions that the TWU had contested. The Commission found that while some provisions did not comply with the legislative requirements, others could be amended to meet the standards set by the Fair Work Act. The Commission made specific amendments to ensure compliance and approved the amended agreement under section 178 of the Fair Work Act. The approval was contingent on the employer implementing the amended agreement within the stipulated timeframe.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission included the approval of the amended Qube Logistics (NSW) – Road Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017, with the specific changes necessary to comply with the Fair Work Act. The employer was directed to implement these changes and provide the amended agreement to the union and its members. The Commission also noted that failure to comply with the approved agreement would result in further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.