Qube Logistics (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics

Case [2025] FWCA 513


[2025] FWCA 513

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qube Logistics (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics

(AG2025/117)

QUBE LOGISTICS (CARGO LINK) BRISBANE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Road transport industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 7 FEBRUARY 2025

Application for approval of the Qube Logistics (Cargo link) Brisbane Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Logistics (Cargo Link) Brisbane Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Qube Logistics (QLD) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to explain to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. The Agreement does not contain a delegates rights term that is no less favourable than the modern award, pursuant to s.205A, and on that basis the term in the relevant modern award will apply and the delegates’ rights term in the Agreement at Schedule 6 Clause 7 will have no effect.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

  1. Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 27.5– Personal/Carer’s Leave.

·   Clause 27.9 – Notification of Personal/Carer’s Leave and Compassionate Leave in respect to the birth of a stillborn child.

·   Clause 29.3 – Jury Service.

However, noting the undertaking provided, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (MUA) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the MUA.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 April 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527965  PR784155>

Details
AGLC
Qube Logistics (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Logistics [2025] FWCA 513
Case
[2025] FWCA 513
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the matter of Qube Logistics (Qld) Pty Ltd, trading as Qube Logistics, was heard, concerning an application for the approval of the Qube Logistics (Cargo Link) Brisbane Enterprise Agreement 2024. The applicant sought to have the agreement registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant, Qube Logistics, is a significant player in the logistics and transport sector, and the agreement in question aimed to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for its workers in Brisbane. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the requirements for registration under the Fair Work Act and whether it provided for the appropriate minimum entitlements and safeguards for the employees.

The central legal issues the Commission had to resolve were whether the agreement complied with the statutory provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to the minimum terms and conditions it provided for employees. The Commission also needed to consider if the agreement facilitated the resolution of workplace issues in an efficient manner and whether it was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees or their representatives. Furthermore, the Commission examined if the agreement provided for procedural fairness, including the process for resolving disputes.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission assessed the proposed agreement against the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. It determined that the agreement provided for the minimum terms and conditions as required by law and was genuinely negotiated. The Commission found that the agreement included provisions for procedural fairness and mechanisms for resolving disputes. Consequently, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement met all the necessary requirements for registration under the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the Qube Logistics (Cargo Link) Brisbane Enterprise Agreement 2024, allowing it to be registered and enforceable.

As a result of the Commission's decision, the Qube Logistics (Cargo Link) Brisbane Enterprise Agreement 2024 was approved and registered. The agreement now legally binds the employer and the employees, setting out the terms and conditions of employment for the relevant workers. This decision ensures that the workers covered by the agreement are entitled to the minimum standards provided for in the agreement, as well as the procedural protections it includes.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.