Quality Roofing Services P/L v McIntyre
Case
•
[2017] SADC 62
•22 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Quality Roofing Services P/L v McIntyre [2017] SADC 62
[2017] SADC 62
22 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Quality Roofing Services P/L sued McIntyre for progress payment for the construction of verandahs on the latter's property. The defendants denied liability and cross-claimed for breach of contract. The verandahs were found to be not structurally adequate or compliant with council approvals. The defendants argued that the construction was not in accordance with the contract and that demolition was required. The plaintiff argued that the construction was in accordance with the contract and that the verandahs could be brought into compliance.
The court found that the plaintiff built the verandahs in accordance with the contract and that the verandahs could have been brought into compliance. The court held that the appropriate remedy for the defective building work was the reasonable cost of rectification, provided that the work to rectify was a reasonable course to take. The court also found that the defendants took positive steps to encourage council to issue proceedings and ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of the ERD Court action and indemnify the plaintiff for the costs it had paid to council. The defendants' cross-action was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to payment in the sum of $27,903 plus interest from the date of completion of the verandahs. The court will hear the parties in relation to the final orders and costs.
The court found that the plaintiff built the verandahs in accordance with the contract and that the verandahs could have been brought into compliance. The court held that the appropriate remedy for the defective building work was the reasonable cost of rectification, provided that the work to rectify was a reasonable course to take. The court also found that the defendants took positive steps to encourage council to issue proceedings and ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of the ERD Court action and indemnify the plaintiff for the costs it had paid to council. The defendants' cross-action was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to payment in the sum of $27,903 plus interest from the date of completion of the verandahs. The court will hear the parties in relation to the final orders and costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Breach of Contract
-
Remedies for Breach of Contract
-
Damages
-
Quantum Meruit
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Allied Grain Systems P/L v Inheritance Capital Asset Management P/L [2023] SASC 175
Cases Citing This Decision
4
McIntyre v Quality Roofing Services Pty Ltd
[2019] SASCFC 29
McIntyre v Quality Roofing Services Pty Ltd
[2019] SASCFC 29
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
1
Hann v BARKER
[2012] SADC 122
W Cook Builders Pty Ltd v Lumbers & Ors
[2005] SADC 153