Quality Bakers Australia Pty Limited T/A Goodman Fielder Australia

Case [2025] FWCA 2086


[2025] FWCA 2086

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s 185—Enterprise agreement

Quality Bakers Australia Pty Limited T/A Goodman Fielder Australia

(AG2025/1820)

GOODMAN FIELDER WESTERN AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025 - 2028

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 25 JUNE 2025

Application for approval of the Goodman Fielder Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025 - 2028.

  1. Quality Bakers Australia Pty Limited T/A Goodman Fielder Australia (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Goodman Fielder Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025 - 2028. The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. In compliance with s 190(4) of the Act, the bargaining representatives’ views regarding the undertakings proffered were sought. They were provided with the opportunity to raise and address any objections they had to the undertakings proffered by the Applicant. No objection was raised.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I note that the following clauses in the Agreement appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards:

(a)Clause 30.7 provides that if leave is taken in advance and the employment terminates before the entitlement has accrued the Company may make a corresponding deduction from any money due to the Employee on termination. This may be inconsistent with the NES if the employer deducts from other NES entitlements owed to the employee.

(b)Clause 31.2(3) provides that if it is not practicable for the Employee to give prior notice of absence, the Employee must notify the Company by telephone of such absence at the first opportunity on the day of the absence. Section 107 of the Act provides notice must be given as soon as is reasonably practicable (which may be after the leave has started).

(c)Clause 32 provides for compassionate leave; however it is silent in relation to the entitlement to when the employee, their spouse, or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. This may be inconsistent with s 104(1)(c) of the Act.

  1. However, I am satisfied that under clause 6 of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Transport Workers' Union of Australia (the organisation), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the organisation is covered by the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 25 June 2025 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 2 July 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2028.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529471  PR788572>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Quality Bakers Australia Pty Limited T/A Goodman Fielder Australia [2025] FWCA 2086
Case
[2025] FWCA 2086
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Quality Bakers Australia Pty Limited trading as Goodman Fielder Australia, sought approval of the Goodman Fielder Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028. The dispute arose from the application for the agreement's approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically focusing on whether the agreement met the requirements for registration with the Fair Work Commission. The applicant argued that the proposed agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the business, while the respondents contended that certain provisions did not meet the statutory requirements.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine if the agreement contained all the mandatory terms and conditions required by the legislation and if it had been genuinely negotiated. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance between the interests of the employer and the employees.

In reaching its decision, the court examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The court considered evidence of the negotiations and the submissions made by both parties. It was determined that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and contained all the mandatory terms as required by the Fair Work Act. The court also found that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. Consequently, the court approved the application for the registration of the Goodman Fielder Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028.

The court's final order was the approval of the Goodman Fielder Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the agreement. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would be in effect from the specified date until the end of the agreement period. The decision provided clarity on the requirements for the approval of enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act, reinforcing the importance of genuine negotiation and the need for a fair and reasonable balance of interests.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.