| [2018] FWCA 4211 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd T/A Qualia Wines
(AG2018/2913)
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE QUALIA WINE SERVICES PTY LTD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 2018
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | SYDNEY, 17 JULY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd Maintenance Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd Maintenance Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd T/A Qualia Wines. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 July 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 November 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE429219 PR609065>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd T/A Qualia Wines [2018] FWCA 4211
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4211
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court involved whether the Maintenance Agreement 2018 was fair and equitable to all parties, particularly the creditors, and whether it provided for a proper and effective restructuring of the company. The court had to assess whether the agreement was in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders, and whether it complied with statutory requirements. Furthermore, the court considered whether the procedures followed in reaching the agreement were appropriate and whether the agreement was transparent and adequately disclosed to all relevant parties.
Upon reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court found that the Maintenance Agreement 2018 was fair and equitable to all stakeholders. The court was satisfied that the agreement provided for an effective restructuring of the company and that it was in the best interests of all parties involved. The court also found that the procedures followed in reaching the agreement were appropriate and that the agreement was transparent and adequately disclosed to all relevant parties. Based on these findings, the court approved the Maintenance Agreement 2018. The court's decision was made in the interest of ensuring the continued operation of the company in a manner that would benefit all stakeholders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.