| [2015] FWCA 6813 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/5600)
QUALIA WINE SERVICES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2015
Wine industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 2 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 9 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 December 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415991 PR572536>
- AGLC
- Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6813
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6813
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely a bargain between the parties, whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it met the criteria for a low-paid industry award. The Commission had to examine if the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties, and if it adhered to the statutory obligations, including the "better off overall test." Additionally, the Commission needed to consider if the agreement was consistent with the principles of the National Employment Standards and the applicable award.
In its decision, the Commission held that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, as it reflected a bargain between the employer and the union. The Commission found that the proposed changes were reasonable and met the better off overall test. It also determined that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements and did not disadvantage employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement was consistent with the principles of the National Employment Standards and the relevant award. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the agreement, finding it met the necessary criteria for endorsement.
The Commission's final order was that the Qualia Wine Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015 be approved as a registered agreement. This approval would allow the changes proposed in the agreement to be implemented, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the approved agreement. The decision confirmed the agreement's validity and provided a framework for the new employment terms to be applied in the workplace.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.