QCoal P/L v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L

Case [2009] QCA 390


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

QCoal P/L  & Anor v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L & Anor [2009] QCA 390

PARTIES:

QCOAL PTY LTD ABN 99 010 911 234
(first plaintiff/first appellant)
QCOAL SONOMA PTY LTD
ABN 72 117 116 784
(second plaintiff/second appellant)
v
CLIFFS AUSTRALIA COAL PTY LTD
ACN 123 583 326
(first defendant/first respondent)
CLIFFS AUSTRALIA WASHPLANT OPERATIONS PTY LTD
ACN 123 748 032
(second defendant/second respondent)

FILE NO/S:

Appeal No 6807 of 2009
SC No 9591 of 2007

DIVISION:

Court of Appeal

PROCEEDING:

General Civil Appeal – Further Order

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court at Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

Judgment delivered 20 November 2009
Further order delivered 15 December 2009

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

Heard on the papers

JUDGES:

Holmes and Fraser JJA and White J

Judgment of the Court

ORDER:

The appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis

CATCHWORDS:

PROCEDURE – COSTS – RECOVERY OF COSTS – where unsuccessful party does not challenge application of the rule that costs follow the event

QCoal P/L & Anor v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L & Anor [2009] QCA 358, cited

COUNSEL:

W Sofronoff QC SG, with J Chapple, for the appellants

G J Gibson QC, with G D Beacham, for the respondents

SOLICITORS:

Russell and Company for the appellants

Mallesons Stephen Jaques for the respondents

  1. THE COURT: On 20 November 2009 the Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal.[1]  The parties have since made written submissions about costs pursuant to the leave granted for that purpose which the appellants had sought. The appellants did not challenge the respondents’ contention that costs should follow the event and be assessed on the standard basis.

  1. The Court orders the appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis.


Details
AGLC
QCoal P/L v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L [2009] QCA 390
Case
[2009] QCA 390
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of QCoal P/L v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L, the parties were engaged in a legal dispute concerning recovery of costs. The case was heard in the Queensland Court of Appeal. The primary issue before the court was whether the unsuccessful party could recover costs of the appeal despite not challenging the application of the rule that costs follow the event.

The court examined the principle that where an unsuccessful party does not challenge the application of the rule that costs follow the event, they are generally bound by that principle. The court noted that the rule is well-established and serves to ensure that the successful party is compensated for the costs incurred in pursuing the litigation. The court found that the appellants had not contested this principle and thus were liable for the costs of the appeal.

Consequently, the court ruled that the appellants were to bear the respondents' costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis. This decision underscores the importance of the principle that costs follow the event and the consequences for parties who do not challenge this principle in their litigation.

Orders

Orders of the court

The appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.