SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
QCoal P/L & Anor v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L & Anor [2009] QCA 390
PARTIES:
QCOAL PTY LTD ABN 99 010 911 234
(first plaintiff/first appellant)
QCOAL SONOMA PTY LTD ABN 72 117 116 784
(second plaintiff/second appellant)
v
CLIFFS AUSTRALIA COAL PTY LTD
ACN 123 583 326
(first defendant/first respondent)
CLIFFS AUSTRALIA WASHPLANT OPERATIONS PTY LTD ACN 123 748 032
(second defendant/second respondent)FILE NO/S:
Appeal No 6807 of 2009
SC No 9591 of 2007DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
General Civil Appeal – Further Order
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
Judgment delivered 20 November 2009
Further order delivered 15 December 2009DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
Heard on the papers
JUDGES:
Holmes and Fraser JJA and White J
Judgment of the Court
ORDER:
The appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis
CATCHWORDS:
PROCEDURE – COSTS – RECOVERY OF COSTS – where unsuccessful party does not challenge application of the rule that costs follow the event
QCoal P/L & Anor v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L & Anor [2009] QCA 358, cited
COUNSEL:
W Sofronoff QC SG, with J Chapple, for the appellants
G J Gibson QC, with G D Beacham, for the respondents
SOLICITORS:
Russell and Company for the appellants
Mallesons Stephen Jaques for the respondents
THE COURT: On 20 November 2009 the Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal.[1] The parties have since made written submissions about costs pursuant to the leave granted for that purpose which the appellants had sought. The appellants did not challenge the respondents’ contention that costs should follow the event and be assessed on the standard basis.
The Court orders the appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis.
- AGLC
- QCoal P/L v Cliffs Australia Coal P/L [2009] QCA 390
- Case
- [2009] QCA 390
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the principle that where an unsuccessful party does not challenge the application of the rule that costs follow the event, they are generally bound by that principle. The court noted that the rule is well-established and serves to ensure that the successful party is compensated for the costs incurred in pursuing the litigation. The court found that the appellants had not contested this principle and thus were liable for the costs of the appeal.
Consequently, the court ruled that the appellants were to bear the respondents' costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis. This decision underscores the importance of the principle that costs follow the event and the consequences for parties who do not challenge this principle in their litigation.
Orders
Orders of the court
The appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of and incidental to the appeal on the standard basis
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.