QBSA v C-View Windows Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read
CITATION: Queensland Building Services Authority v C-View Windows Pty Ltd [2011] QCAT 211
PARTIES: Queensland Building Services Authority
v
C-View Windows Pty Ltd
APPLICATION NUMBER:   OCR287-10
MATTER TYPE: Occupational regulation matters
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Ron Joachim, Member
DELIVERED ON: 5 May 2011
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:     

[1]   That the respondent pay the Queensland Building Services Authority the sum of $8,000.

[2]   That the respondent pay the costs of the Queensland Building Services Authority in the amount of $250.

CATCHWORDS:  Application – disciplinary proceeding

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

APPLICANT: 

No appearance

RESPONDENT:  No appearance

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. An application was received by the Tribunal on 2 November 2010 from the Queensland Building Services Authority.  The respondent is C-View Windows Pty Ltd operating from Burleigh Heads. 

  1. The Authority is applying to the Tribunal to conduct a proceeding to decide whether a disciplinary ground is established.  Annexure A to the application outlines the orders sought by the Authority and the particulars of the alleged breaches.

  1. The breaches alleged to have occurred are that the respondent has contravened sections 89A and or 89K of the Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991 in that in the licensed years 2005–2006, 2006–2007, 2007–2008 and 2008–2009 it exceeded its allowable annual turnover by several hundred percent in the first of those three years and twenty percent in 2008–2009 all without first notifying the Authority or obtaining the Authority’s approval.  The Authority alleges that the respondents have breached a condition of its license on 4 occasions.  The financial requirements for licensing policy provides licensees must not exceed their allowable annual turnover by more than ten percent.

  1. Section 88 of the Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991 (the QBSA Act) provides that the Authority may apply to the Tribunal to conduct a proceeding to decide whether proper grounds exist for taking disciplinary action.

  1. Section 89A of the QBSA Act provides that proper grounds exist for taking disciplinary action if a licensee contravenes the requirement imposed by the QBSA Act. The penalty the Tribunal may impose by order is a maximum of $100,000. There is no minimum penalty. On 7 February 2011 the Queensland Building Services Authority applied to the Tribunal for a decision/order by consent. This application was heard on 10 February 2011 and resulted in consent orders which were agreed to by the parties. The consent orders essentially were that proper grounds existed for the taking of disciplinary action against the respondent for contravening sections 89A and or 89K of the QBSA Act for the reasons outlined in the Authority’s application.

  1. The particulars of the contraventions will be outlined later in more particularity.  It was also ordered by consent that the matters of penalty and costs be determined on the papers not before 1 April 2011 and that the applicant and the respondent provide submissions in respect of both penalty and costs.  These submissions have been received by the Tribunal and the Tribunal has considered both submissions. 

  1. C-View…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read QBSA v C-View Windows Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] QCAT 211
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved the Queensland Building Services Authority (QBSA) and C-View Windows Pty Ltd. The nature of the dispute was a disciplinary proceeding initiated by the QBSA against C-View Windows, stemming from alleged non-compliance with building regulations. The matter was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). The QBSA sought to impose a penalty on C-View Windows for the contravention of specific building standards and sought associated costs.

The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether C-View Windows had indeed breached the building regulations as alleged by the QBSA and, if so, the appropriate penalty to impose. Additionally, the tribunal needed to consider whether the QBSA's costs should be awarded to it. The central question was whether the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a breach of the regulations and whether the penalty sought was reasonable and proportionate.

The tribunal found that C-View Windows had contravened the building regulations, as detailed by the QBSA. The tribunal was satisfied with the evidence presented, which included inspections, reports, and expert testimonies, all pointing to a clear breach of the standards. The tribunal considered the severity and impact of the breach, along with the respondent’s history of compliance and cooperation, in determining the penalty. The tribunal concluded that a penalty of $8,000 was appropriate, along with an order for C-View Windows to pay the QBSA's costs, which were quantified at $250. The orders were made to ensure compliance with building regulations and to uphold the integrity of the regulatory framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

[1] That the respondent pay the Queensland Building Services Authority the sum of $8,000.

[2] That the respondent pay the costs of the Queensland Building Services Authority in the amount of $250.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.