Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas

Case [2023] FWCA 950


[2023] FWCA 950

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas

(AG2023/674)

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS (QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 11

Scientific services

COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC

MELBOURNE, 30 MARCH 2023

Application for approval of the Professional Engineers (Qantas Airways Limited) Enterprise Agreement 11

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Professional Engineers (Qantas Airways Limited) Enterprise Agreement 11 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 30 March 2023 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 6 April 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE519620  PR760725>

Details
AGLC
Qantas Airways Limited T/A Qantas [2023] FWCA 950
Case
[2023] FWCA 950
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Qantas Airways Limited trading as Qantas, applied for approval of the Professional Engineers (Qantas Airways Limited) Enterprise Agreement 11. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission. The applicant sought approval of the agreement under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicants argued that the agreement was appropriate for the operation of the Better Off Overall Test.

The primary issue before the Commission was whether the agreement was in the interests of the employees covered by it, and whether it was better off overall than the applicable awards. This required the Commission to assess the agreement's provisions against the relevant criteria. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for employees, taking into account both the financial and non-financial benefits. The Commission had to consider the potential impact of the agreement on the employees' overall terms and conditions of employment, including wages, leave entitlements, and other benefits.

The Commission found that the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Better Off Overall Test. The agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for employees, taking into account both the financial and non-financial benefits. The Commission considered the potential impact of the agreement on the employees' overall terms and conditions of employment, including wages, leave entitlements, and other benefits. The agreement also provided for the establishment of a dispute resolution process, which the Commission considered to be an important aspect of the agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the interests of the employees covered by it, and that it was better off overall than the applicable awards.

The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The modifications related to the calculation of penalty rates and the definition of overtime. The Commission considered that these modifications were necessary to ensure that the agreement complied with the requirements of the Act, and did not affect the overall fairness and reasonableness of the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.