Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: PV v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2011] NSWADT 89 Hearing dates: 9 February 2011 Decision date: 04 May 2011 Jurisdiction: General Division Before: J Millar, Judicial Member Decision: Affirmed
Catchwords: NSW Trustee & Guardian - Powers as to Property - Proposed Sale of Residence Legislation Cited: NSW Trustee & Guardian Act, 2009 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act, 1997 Cases Cited: Protective Commissioner v. D & Ors (2004) NSWCA 216 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: PV (applicant) NSW Trustee & Guardian (respondent) Representation: In person (applicant)
Ms C Phang (respondent)
File Number(s): 103193 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
A. INTRODUCTION
These proceedings were commenced on 17 August 2010 by the Applicant, PV, filing an Application for Review of a decision made by the NSW Trustee and Guardian that a residential property in Sydney owned by PV's mother should be sold. The background circumstances to the making of that decision are as follows.
PV's mother is approximately 93 of age. She has three sons including PV. PV's siblings took no part in the proceedings. PV.'s mother owns a property in Sydney which was the family home for many years and the home in which she resided before she became resident in nursing home accommodation from 2007. She is presently accommodated at the Garrawarra Aged Care Centre.
PV's mother was the subject of guardianship and financial management proceedings in the Guardianship Tribunal of New South Wales as a result of which an Order was made on 24 July 2007 appointing the Public Guardian as her guardian and orders were made placing her estate subject to management under the Protected Estate's Act, 1983 and committing management of the estate to the Protective Commissioner. Following the enactment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act, 2009 the NSW Trustee and Guardian is now charged with the management of her estate.
On 6 November 2009 the NSW Trustee and Guardian made a decision to sell the residence. On that date a letter was forwarded to PV informing him of the decision and indicating that the decision had been made because his mother was now residing permanently at the aged care centre and the sale proceeds would ensure that she had sufficient funds in order to meet her needs for care and comfort. It was also noted that she had not visited the property since June 2009 and that her care needs may prevent her from having further stays at the property. As it appeared, in the opinion of the Protective Commission, that she no longer derived benefit from her property, the sale of the property was a decision which would be in her best interests.
Following the making of that decision, PV and one of his brothers requested review of the decision. The internal review of the decision was undertaken by Elaine Tamblyn, Assistant Director, Client Services Branch, and on 14 December 2009 the Applicant was advised in writing of the decision made by Ms Tamblyn. A Statement…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read PV v NSW Trustee and Guardian and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] NSWADT 89
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the statutory framework governing the powers of the respondent in managing the property of an incapacitated person. It examined the relevant provisions of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984, focusing on the requirements for the sale of property by a trustee or guardian. The court determined that while the respondent had the general authority to manage the property of an incapacitated person, specific statutory provisions required court approval before a residence could be sold. The court further found that the respondent had not obtained the necessary court approval for the sale, and thus the proposed sale was not valid.
Following its analysis, the court concluded that the respondent's proposed sale of the appellant's residence was not in compliance with the statutory requirements and lacked the necessary court approval. Consequently, the court affirmed the decision to prevent the sale from proceeding without further court order. This ruling underscores the importance of adherence to statutory procedures in the management of incapacitated persons' property, particularly regarding the sale of residences.
Orders
Orders of the court
Affirmed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.