FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| PULLMAN & PULLMAN | [2017] FamCA 1057 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child lives – Interim – Where previous consent orders in place for child to live with mother and spend alternate weekend time with father – Where child has remained in father’s care since November 2017 – Where father seeks suspension of consent orders – Where father seeks sole parental responsibility and for child to live with him and spend only supervised time with mother – Where mother seeks a return of the child and for a continuation of previous consent orders – Where mother advised court she intended to move to Sydney – Where mother did not seek an interim relocation order with child – Where mother’s imminent move to Sydney renders her orders sought impossible – Where mother opposed any supervised time with child – Where child’s mental health at risk if she was to return to the mother – Where it is in the best interests for the child to live with father – Where father to have sole parental responsibility in the interim – Where child to have communication with mother – Appointment of an Independent Children’s Lawyer – Family report and psychiatric assessment to be prepared. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 61DA, 65DAA, 65DAC |
| Banks & Banks [2015] FamCAFC 36 Mauldera & Orbel (2014) FLC 93-602 Wacando v The Commonwealth (1981) 148 CLR 1 S v Australian Crime Commission (2005) 144 FCR 431 Goode & Goode (2006) FLC 93-286 Salah & Salah [2016] FamCAFC 100 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Pullman |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Pullman |
| FILE NUMBER: | CSC | 391 | of | 2012 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 15 December 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Cairns |
| PLACE HEARD: | Cairns |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Tree J |
| HEARING DATE: | 5 December 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITORS FOR THE APPLICANT: | Millyard Family Lawyers |
| THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
Orders
Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6(b), 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Orders of 28 August 2013 be stayed.
That B born … 2004 (“the child”), live with the father and he have sole parental responsibility for her.
That the mother be permitted to communicate with the child each Sunday and Wednesday by Skype or telephone between 6:00pm and 6:30pm, with the father being permitted to supervise such calls, and terminate a call if he believes that it has become inappropriate.
The mother be prohibited from removing the child from the father’s care or any school, counsellor or other organisation attend by the child from time to time.
That the child continue attending “C Group” for as long as is recommended by that organisation.
That the father arrange for the child to attend upon a child psychiatrist for the purpose of assessing her mental health and receiving such treatment as is recommended by that psychiatrist.
That the father advise the mother and keep the mother advised of the child’s treating health professionals.
That the mother be restrained from contacting the staff of “C Group,” D School or any other counsellor treating…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Pullman and Pullman and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 1057
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were: (1) with whom the child should live and who should have sole parental responsibility; (2) the nature and extent of the mother's communication with the child; (3) whether the mother should be prohibited from removing the child from the father's care or from attending certain institutions; (4) the child's ongoing participation in therapeutic services and the father's responsibility for arranging psychiatric assessments; and (5) the extent to which the mother should be restrained from contacting the child's service providers. The court also considered the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer and the preparation of various reports.
Tree J made orders that the child live with the father and that he have sole parental responsibility. The mother was permitted limited supervised communication with the child via Skype or telephone. Crucially, the mother was prohibited from removing the child from the father's care or from any educational or therapeutic institutions the child attended. The father was directed to ensure the child continued attending "C Group," arranged for a psychiatric assessment of the child, and kept the mother informed of the child's treating professionals. The mother was restrained from contacting the child's service providers. The court also ordered the appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer to facilitate the preparation of a Family Report and psychiatric assessments of both parents. The remaining applications for interim orders were dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6(b), 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Orders of 28 August 2013 be stayed.
2.
That B born … 2004 (“the child”), live with the father and he have sole parental responsibility for her.
3.
That the mother be permitted to communicate with the child each Sunday and Wednesday by Skype or telephone between 6:00pm and 6:30pm, with the father being permitted to supervise such calls, and terminate a call if he believes that it has become inappropriate.
4.
The mother be prohibited from removing the child from the father’s care or any school, counsellor or other organisation attend by the child from time to time.
5.
That the child continue attending “C Group” for as long as is recommended by that organisation.
6.
That the father arrange for the child to attend upon a child psychiatrist for the purpose of assessing her mental health and receiving such treatment as is recommended by that psychiatrist.
7.
That the father advise the mother and keep the mother advised of the child’s treating health professionals.
8.
That the mother be restrained from contacting the staff of “C Group,” D School or any other counsellor treating the child from time to time.
9.
That an Independent Children's Lawyer be appointed and Legal Aid Queensland be requested to arrange such representation.
10.
That the Independent Children's Lawyer organise for the preparation of a Family Report by a psychologist and each of the parties are directed to comply with all reasonable requests of the Independent Children's Lawyer to attend and participate on the dates and times as requested in order for the preparation of the Family Report to occur.
11.
That the Independent Children's Lawyer organise for a psychiatric assessment of the parent parties and for the preparation of a report in this regard and each of the parties are directed to comply with all reasonable requests of the Independent Children's Lawyer to attend and participate on the dates and times as requested in order for the preparation of the psychiatric assessment report.
12.
That otherwise the parties’ applications for interim orders be dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.