PULLER & TRAPP

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

PULLER & TRAPP [2011] FamCA 931
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Child’s name change – Child’s views
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Chapman & Palmer, In the Marriage of (1978) FLC 90-510
Beach & Stemmler, In the Marriage of (1979) FLC 90-692
Flanagan v Handcock (2002) FLC 93-102
APPLICANT: Mr Puller
RESPONDENT: Ms Trapp
FILE NUMBER: SYC 624 of 2009
DATE DELIVERED: 4 November 2011
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Collier J
HEARING DATE: 4 November 2011

Orders

(1)That the child, B born … 1999, continue to use and be known by the surname Trapp.

(2)That the parties pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer as follows:

i.as to two thirds an amount of $742 by the father; and

ii.as to one third an amount of $372 by the mother

(3)That the father pay the sum of $742 within three (3) months of this date to Legal Aid NSW in respect of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter.

(4)That the mother pay the sum of $372 within twelve (12) months of this date to Legal Aid NSW in respect of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter.

(5)That all applications and cross applications in respect of parenting issues shall be and are hereby dismissed.

(6)That all issues be removed from the Active Pending Cases List.

(7)That all material produced on subpoena be returned not before fifty-six (56) days from the date of these Orders. 

(8)That the mother serve upon the father, care of each of his mother and sister, a copy of these orders by placing them in a sealed envelope with an accompanying letter, to each of his mother and sister, requesting them to make the envelope available to him.  Service of those documents may be proved by affidavit.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Puller & Trapp is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: SYC 624 of 2009

Mr Puller

Applicant

And

Ms Trapp

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

1.On 28 July this year I made a number of orders concerning the subject child B.  On that occasion, the mother and the Independent Children's Lawyer were present in Court.  The father, Mr Puller, attended by telephone, only after the Court made contact with him.

2.On that day, the father indicated that he did not wish to take any further part in the child’s life, save with one reservation to which I will come shortly.  Accordingly, on that day, I discharged all existing orders in respect of the said child.  I then ordered that she live with her mother, that the mother have sole parental responsibility and that the father spend time with the child in accordance with her wishes.

3.I accept that since the making of those Orders, there has been no contact or communication between the mother and father, and, as…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read PULLER & TRAPP and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] FamCA 931
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of *Puller & Trapp* concerned a dispute between a mother and father regarding the surname of their child, B. The matter came before Collier J.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the child should continue to use and be known by the surname Trapp, which was the surname of the mother. The court was also required to determine the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer and to make orders regarding the dismissal of parenting applications.

Collier J ordered that the child, B, continue to use and be known by the surname Trapp. The court further ordered that the father pay two-thirds of the Independent Children’s Lawyer's costs, amounting to $742, within three months, and the mother pay one-third, amounting to $372, within twelve months. All applications and cross-applications concerning parenting issues were dismissed, and all material produced on subpoena was to be returned after fifty-six days. The court also made specific directions for the mother to serve the orders on the father via his mother and sister.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) That the child, B born … 1999, continue to use and be known by the surname Trapp.

(2) That the parties pay the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer as follows:

i. as to two thirds an amount of $742 by the father; and

ii. as to one third an amount of $372 by the mother

(3) That the father pay the sum of $742 within three (3) months of this date to Legal Aid NSW in respect of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter.

(4) That the mother pay the sum of $372 within twelve (12) months of this date to Legal Aid NSW in respect of the costs of the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this matter.

(5) That all applications and cross applications in respect of parenting issues shall be and are hereby dismissed.

(6) That all issues be removed from the Active Pending Cases List.

(7) That all material produced on subpoena be returned not before fifty-six (56) days from the date of these Orders.

(8) That the mother serve upon the father, care of each of his mother and sister, a copy of these orders by placing them in a sealed envelope with an accompanying letter, to each of his mother and sister, requesting them to make the envelope available to him. Service of those documents may be proved by affidavit.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.