Prothonotary v Wilson

Case

[1999] NSWSC 1115

12 November 1999

No judgment structure available for this case.

CITATION: Prothonotary v Wilson [1999] NSWSC 1115
CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law
FILE NUMBER(S): 12914/99
HEARING DATE(S): 12 November 1999
JUDGMENT DATE:
12 November 1999

PARTIES :


Prothonotary
John Wilson
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJatCL
COUNSEL :
SOLICITORS: Crown Solicitors
Defendant in person
CATCHWORDS:
DECISION:


    THE SUPREME COURT
    OF NEW SOUTH WALES
    COMMON LAW DIVISION 122914 of 1997

    WOOD CJ at CL

    FRIDAY 12 NOVEMBER 1999

    THE PROTHONOTARY v JOHN WILSON
1   HIS HONOUR: When the matter was before me last for sentence, I neglected to deal with the requirements of s 6(3) of the Sentencing Act, which has been brought to my attention.
2   PRISONER: Speak up, please.
3   HIS HONOUR: The reasons for the order, I think, were otherwise obvious, but in order to be clear about it, I will state that in accordance with the requirements of s 6(3) of the Sentencing Act, I specify that I have imposed fixed term sentences for the two offences of contempt of which the defendant has been convicted, rather than sentences offering the opportunity for release on parole, because of his refusal to acknowledge the criminality involved in the throwing of paint bombs at a judicial officer. In the absence of any sign of contrition or of insight on his part into the wrongness of his conduct and in the presence of his belligerent defiance of the Court, it is evident that no purpose whatsoever will be served by a period of supervised release on parole and, accordingly, in the imposition of a sentence structured so as to include a minimum and an additional term. The court will now adjourn.
    **********
Last Modified: 11/17/1999
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0