Prothonotary of the Supreme Court NSW v Carr

[2004] NSWCA 2

CITATION:	Prothonotary of the Supreme Court NSW v Carr [2004] NSWCA 2
HEARING DATE(S):	18/12/03
JUDGMENT DATE:	18 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF:	Meagher JA at 1; Tobias JA at 1; McColl JA at 1
DECISION:	Declarations 1, 2 and 3 made as sought; order 4 made as sought and no order as to costs.
PARTIES :	Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Peter David Carr
FILE NUMBER(S):	CA 40753/03
COUNSEL:	A: D Dickinson & R Collins R: In Person
SOLICITORS:	A: I V Knight Crown Solicitor R: N/A

CA 40753 of 2003

MEAGHER JA
TOBIAS JA
McCOLL JA

Thursday 18 December 2003

PROTHONOTARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES v PETER DAVID CARR

Judgment

1 MEAGHER JA: This is an application by the Acting Prothonotary of the Supreme Court for certain orders against the opponent, Mr Peter David Carr, a person who is at the moment but not for very long, a solicitor of this Court.

2 He has been convicted on various charges, such as defrauding a company while being a director and of fraudulently misappropriating moneys for his own use. He has pleaded guilty for those charges and been convicted of them and served whatever sentences had to be served. His name still remains on the roll of solicitors where it obviously does not belong. These proceedings are brought in order to tidy up that state of affairs.

3 The Court will make declarations 1, 2 and 3 as sought, order 4 as sought and there will be no order as to costs.

******

Last Modified: 02/06/2004