| [2021] FWCA 5654 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Prosek Security Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6800)
PROSEK SECURITY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Security services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI | MELBOURNE, 15 SEPTEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Prosek Security Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] Prosek Security Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Prosek Security Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
[2] Since the application was made, the Commission inquired about whether the pre approval requirements were met, whether the Agreement contains the mandatory terms and raised concerns about whether the Agreement passes the “better off overall” test. Further information was provided in relation to these matters.
[3] Regarding the pre approval steps, the relevant employees were notified of the time and place of the vote on the day that was 6 days (and not at least 7 clear days) prior to the commencement of the vote, contrary to the requirement at s.180(3). However all relevant employees cast a valid vote. In the circumstances and having regard to the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others 1, I am satisfied that:
(a) this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
(b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error.
[4] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.
[5] Noting clause 1.4.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] Written undertakings were given in accordance with s.190 of the Act and are attached at Annexure A (Undertakings). The employee bargaining representative supported the Undertakings. I am satisfied that the Undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the Undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
[7] On the basis of the material contained in the application, further information provided on request of the Commission and the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[8] The Agreement was approved on 15 September 2021 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 September 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 September 2023.
[9] For the purposes of publication, the signature page of the Agreement has been redacted in part, for confidentiality and as the enterprise agreement when made did not contain the redacted details. 2
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
<AE513053 PR733722>
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
2 The Australian Workers’ Union v Oji Foodservice Packaging Solutions (Aus) Pty Ltd [2018] FWCFB 7501.
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Prosek Security Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 5654
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 5654
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms, considering factors such as minimum rates of pay, penalty rates, and other employment conditions. Additionally, the court examined if the agreement complied with the requirements for employee representation and consultation.
The court found that the Prosek Security Enterprise Agreement 2021 provided for fair and reasonable terms that balanced the interests of both employers and employees. The agreement included provisions for minimum rates of pay, penalty rates, and other employment conditions that were deemed reasonable and consistent with industry standards. Furthermore, the agreement met the requirements for employee representation and consultation, ensuring that employees had an opportunity to participate in the negotiation process and have their voices heard. As a result, the court approved the agreement, finding it to be in the best interests of the employees and the employer.
The court's decision was communicated in a written judgement, and the Prosek Security Enterprise Agreement 2021 was approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission. The agreement now serves as a binding contract between Prosek Security and its employees, setting out the terms and conditions of employment for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.