| [2014] FWCA 7529 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Prosegur Australia Pty Limited
(AG2014/8745)
PROSEGUR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD COFFS HARBOUR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2016
Security services | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 29 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd Coffs Harbour Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd Coffs Harbour Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Prosegur Australia Pty Limited (the Applicant).
[2] On reviewing the application the Commission sought further clarification about various matters, including the intent of the proposed Dispute Resolution clause. A copy of this correspondence was also provided to an employee bargaining representative for the proposed Agreement.
[3] The Applicant subsequently provided undertakings in regard to each of these matters.
[4] I am satisfied that the proposed undertakings do not cause financial detriment to any employee to be covered by the proposed Agreement, or result in substantial changes to it. The undertakings are accordingly accepted and will now be taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy is attached to this decision.
[5] I am also satisfied that each of the various requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and s.190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410801 PR556953>
- AGLC
- Prosegur Australia Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 7529
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7529
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement had been made fairly and in accordance with the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act. This involved examining whether the agreement had been negotiated in good faith, whether there was adequate employee representation, and whether the process through which the agreement was made was fair. Additionally, the court considered whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for coverage, including the percentage of employees who had voted in favour of the agreement.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that there was adequate employee representation during the negotiation process. The court was satisfied that the process through which the agreement was made was fair and that it complied with the procedural fairness requirements. The Commission also noted that the agreement met the statutory thresholds for coverage, having been approved by the requisite percentage of employees who voted in favour. Consequently, the court approved the Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd Coffs Harbour Enterprise Agreement 2014 - 2016, certifying it as meeting all the requirements under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.