Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Proprietors of SP 16183 v North Sydney Council [2020] NSWLEC 1645 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2, 19 October and 3 December 2020, final agreement filed 17 November 2020 Date of orders: 15 December 2020 Decision date: 15 December 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pullinger AC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Term 1 of the Development Control Order - General Order issued to the Applicant by the Respondent on 16 June 2020 in relation to the premises at 85 Kurraba Road, Kurraba Point NSW 2089 is modified as follows:
Term 1 of the Order must be complied with by 31 March 2021.
(3) Each party is to pay its own costs.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDER – GENERAL ORDER – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Texts Cited: Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy (July 2020)
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proprietors of SP 16183 (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
T Poisel (Applicant)
D Baird (Solicitor) (Applicant)
Colin Biggers and Paisley Lawyers (Applicant)
Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/206622 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is a Class 1 appeal pursuant to the provisions of section 8.18 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against a Development Control Order – General Order (the Order) issued to the applicant by the respondent in relation to property at 85 Kurraba Road, Kurraba Point NSW 2089 (the site).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 2, 19 October and 3 December 2020. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
Consistent with the Court’s COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy, published on 8 July 2020, the matter was conducted by Microsoft Teams.
-
At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. The agreement involves the Court upholding the appeal and modifying the term of the Order.
-
Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision, if the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 8.18(4)(b) of the EPA Act to modify the Order.
-
At issue is a multi level viewing platform constructed in the rear yard of the site.
-
Pursuant to s 9.34 of the EPA Act, the respondent issued the Order to the applicant on 16 June 2020.
-
Term 1 of the Order required demolition and removal of the viewing platform within thirty days of the date of the Order.
-
The applicant commenced these proceedings on 14 July 2020.
-
At the conciliation conference the parties agreed the applicant should undertake alterations to the viewing platform to reduce its height, install privacy screening to protect neighbouring properties, certify its structural adequacy and render it safe and fit for purpose. The parties also agreed to its temporary status.
-
Upon resumption of the conciliation conference, the parties agreed to modify the term of the Order to effect demolition and removal of the now-altered viewing platform by 31 March 2021.
-
Having considered any jurisdictional requirements and forming the necessary view required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I therefore find it is appropriate to make the orders agreed to by the parties and now dispose of the matter.
Orders
-
The Court orders that:
The appeal is upheld.
Term 1 of the Development Control Order - General Order issued to the Applicant by the Respondent on 16 June 2020 in relation to the premises at 85 Kurraba Road, Kurraba Point NSW 2089 is modified as follows:
Term 1 of the Order must be complied with by 31 March 2021.
Each party is to pay its own costs.
………………………..
M Pullinger
Acting Commissioner of the Court
**********
- AGLC
- Proprietors of SP 16183 v North Sydney Council [2020] NSWLEC 1645
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1645
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the council had the authority to impose the development control order and, if so, whether it had acted within the scope of that authority. The plaintiffs argued that the order was not supported by the necessary statutory provisions and that the council had failed to consider relevant factors. The council, on the other hand, maintained that the order was lawful and necessary to protect the public interest.
The court found in favour of the plaintiffs and held that the council had indeed exceeded its statutory powers in imposing the development control order. The court held that the order was not supported by the relevant statutory provisions and that the council had failed to consider all relevant factors. The court also held that the plaintiffs had demonstrated a sufficient connection to the property to bring the appeal. Accordingly, the court ordered that the appeal be upheld, that the term of the development control order be modified to 31 March 2021, and that each party bear its own costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Term 1 of the Development Control Order - General Order issued to the Applicant by the Respondent on 16 June 2020 in relation to the premises at 85 Kurraba Road, Kurraba Point NSW 2089 is modified as follows:
Term 1 of the Order must be complied with by 31 March 2021.
(3) Each party is to pay its own costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.