Prom Coast Centres for Children Inc.; Australian Education Union

Case [2017] FWCA 4463


[2017] FWCA 4463
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.217—Enterprise agreement

Prom Coast Centres for Children Inc.; Australian Education Union
(AG2017/3747)

PROM COAST CENTRES KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS AND EDUCATORS AGREEMENT 2016

Children’s services

COMMISSIONER WILSON

MELBOURNE, 29 AUGUST 2017

Application for variation of Clause 17.5 of the Prom Coast Centres Kindergarten Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016.

[1] This matter concerns an application made by the Australian Education Union (“AEU”) and Prom Coast Centres for Children Inc. (“Prom Coast”) under section 217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The application seeks for the Fair Work Commission to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty in the Prom Coast Centres Kindergarten Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016 1 (the Agreement).

[2] The Agreement was approved by Commissioner Lee on 23 September 2016 2 and was stated to operate from 30 September 2016, with a nominal expiry date of 31 July 20193. The Employer of the persons to be covered by the Agreement was stated as Prom Coast, and the AEU were indicated as bargaining representatives on behalf of employees4.

[3] The AEU and Prom Coast have applied for certain amendments to be made to the Agreement pursuant to section 217 of the Act. The amendments principally go to the issue of pay rates for casual Educators under the Agreement. It is said these changes are needed to correct uncertainty in casual Educators pay rates so that these employees receive rates of pay that are not less than they would receive under relevant award, the Children’s Services Award 2010 (“the Award”).

Legislation

[4] Section 217 of the Act reads as follows:

“217 Variation of an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty

(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty on application by any of the following:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

(2) If the FWC varies the enterprise agreement, the variation operates from the day

    specified in the decision to vary the agreement.”

Background

[5] At the time of the approval of the Agreement cl 17.5 did not specify the rate of pay for an employee other than a Teacher to which a 25% casual loading applied. After approval, the Unions were concerned that if the 25% loading were applied to the Teachers rate of pay at cl 17.5 of the Agreement then casual Educators would be paid less than under the Award.

[6] As a result of this concern the AEU initiated proceedings in the Fair Work Commission on 16 December 2016 under s.739 of the Act to address this concern. During the course of these proceedings two conferences were held before Deputy President Hamilton whereby the Employer and the Unions reached an understanding as to how to address this issue.

[7] The changes agreed to by both parties include the following:

  • Making payments to pay casual Educators at the rate of pay that would have been applied to them under the Award from the first full pay period on or after 29 June 2016 to the first full pay period that commenced on or before 30 June 2017. The payments will be in the form of back payments for the period; and


  • Variation to the Agreement to make clear that casual Educators are to be paid using the 52/52 rates of pay at Schedule 2 plus the 25% loading at clause 17.5(c). The obligation to pay the 52/52 rates plus the 25% loading would commence on the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2017. 5


[8] As a result of this agreement between the Employer and the AEU the AEU and Prom Coast have made an application to vary the Agreement as follows:

Insert new paragraph (d) at clause 17.5 in the following terms; for classifications where there are two different hourly rates of pay at Schedule 2, the additional loading of 25% is applied to the 52/52 hourly rate from the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2017.

  • Rename paragraphs from (d)-(e) to (e)-(f).


  • Variation to operate on and from 1 July 2017. 6


[9] I agree that in all the circumstances there is ambiguity or uncertainty the casual Educators rates of pay which will be removed by a variation to the Agreement.

[10] I am satisfied that it is desirable to remove this ambiguity or uncertainty. Accordingly I will exercise my discretion to vary the Agreement as requested by the AEU and Prom Coast.

[11]
This variation shall operate from 1 July 2017.

COMMISSIONER

 1   AE421270.

 2   [2016] FWCA 6826.

 3 Ibid [5].

 4 Ibid [4].

 5   Statutory Declaration of Martel Menz, Australian Education Union, 15 August 2017; Statutory Declaration Shane Lucas, Early Learning Association of Australian, 18 August 2017.

 6   Form F1 Application, 10 July 2017 Q2.1.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE421270  PR595653>

Details
AGLC
Prom Coast Centres for Children Inc.; Australian Education Union [2017] FWCA 4463
Case
[2017] FWCA 4463
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Prom Coast Centres for Children Inc. and the Australian Education Union were before the Fair Work Commission in an application for the variation of Clause 17.5 of the Prom Coast Centres Kindergarten Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016. The union argued that the clause, which pertains to the calculation of penalty rates, was inequitable and should be amended to reflect changes in the industrial landscape and to provide a more accurate reflection of the employees' work conditions.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Clause 17.5 of the Agreement was unjust and required amendment to achieve a fair and equitable outcome for the employees. The union contended that the clause did not accurately reflect the employees' workload and the time they spent on duty, leading to underpayment of penalty rates. The employer, on the other hand, maintained that the clause was fair and reflective of the employees' responsibilities and time spent on duty. The Commission needed to determine if the clause was indeed unfair and, if so, what the appropriate variation should be.

The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and analysed the current industrial conditions and the specific duties of the employees. It found that the clause did not accurately reflect the employees' workload and the time they spent on duty, leading to underpayment of penalty rates. The Commission varied the clause to ensure that the employees were fairly compensated for their work, taking into account the changes in the industrial landscape and the specific duties of the employees. The new clause was deemed to be fair and equitable, reflecting the employees' workload and time spent on duty.

The Commission ordered the variation of Clause 17.5 of the Prom Coast Centres Kindergarten Teachers and Educators Agreement 2016 to accurately reflect the employees' workload and time spent on duty. The new clause provided for a more equitable calculation of penalty rates, taking into account the changes in the industrial landscape and the specific duties of the employees. The variation was deemed to be fair and just, achieving a balanced outcome for both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.