Progress East Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Progress East Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1029
Hearing dates: 4 December and 14 December 2018
Date of orders: 06 February 2019
Decision date: 06 February 2019
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Walsh C
Decision:

(1)   The appeal is upheld.
(2)   Consent is granted for the modifications sought in respect of development consent DA 266/2015/C for the alterations and additions to the existing residential flat building at 131 Mount Street, Coogee, subject to the schedule of modified conditions set out in Annexure “A” and the consolidated conditions as set out in Annexure “B”.
(3)   The exhibits, other than exhibits A, C, 2, 3 and 4, may be returned.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Modification of development consent; s 4.55(1A) of EPA Act; whether substantially the same development; whether minimal environmental impact; amenity; objections; consent orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Cases Cited: Agricultural Equity Investments Pty Ltd v Westlime Pty Limited (No 3) [2015] NSWLEC 75
Dravin Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 38
Texts Cited: Practice Note - Class 1 Development Appeals
Randwick Development Control Plan 2013
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Progress East Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
M Jaku, Jaku Legal (Applicant)
V McGrath, Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/174588
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

Introduction

  1. This judgment concerns a Class 1 appeal brought by Progress East Pty Ltd under s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act). The appeal is against Randwick City Council’s (Council) refusal of an application to modify a development consent. The application is referenced as DA 266/2015/C. DA 266/2015/C was lodged under s 4.55 (1A) of the EPA Act.

  2. The application seeks to modify an approved development being a part three and part four storey residential flat building comprising six residential units (3×1 bedroom and 3×2 bedroom) with basement parking and landscaping, at 131 Mount Street, Coogee, also described as Lots 1 to 6 in Strata Plan 96380 (site). The proposed modification involves alterations to the approved residential flat building to reconfigure certain bedrooms, bathrooms and storage areas.

  3. There is some background to the application. A residential flat building currently exists on the site. However, the as-built development included some elements which were inconsistent with the original consent. The effect of these inconsistencies was suggested to introduce the potential for additional sleeping rooms within the development. Council’s contentions (Exhibit B) originally maintained concerns that the proposal was not “substantially the same development” (a jurisdictional requirement of modification applications generally) as a consequence of the additional capacity for sleeping rooms.

  4. Changes to the original appeal plans (Exhibit C) were undertaken in response to this and other contentions raised by the Council. The amended plans, and dialogue in regard to conditions, had reached the point that the contentions has fallen away and agreed consent orders for this matter were prepared by the parties, and proposed to the Court, prior to the commencement…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Progress East Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] NSWLEC 1029
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Progress East Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council, the dispute arose from an application for modifications to a development consent for a residential flat building in Coogee. The applicant, Progress East Pty Ltd, sought changes to the approved development, which was originally granted by the respondent, Randwick City Council. The council initially denied the modifications, leading Progress East Pty Ltd to appeal the decision.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the modifications proposed by Progress East Pty Ltd were consistent with the original development consent and whether the modifications would cause undue harm or detriment to the neighbourhood or surrounding properties. The court also had to consider whether the modifications aligned with the planning policies and objectives of the local council.

The court, in its reasoning, found that the modifications proposed by Progress East Pty Ltd were in line with the original development consent and did not cause undue harm or detriment to the neighbourhood or surrounding properties. The court also determined that the modifications complied with the planning policies and objectives of the council. Consequently, the appeal was upheld, and consent was granted for the modifications sought. The exhibits, other than certain specified ones, were allowed to be returned.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Consent is granted for the modifications sought in respect of development consent DA 266/2015/C for the alterations and additions to the existing residential flat building at 131 Mount Street, Coogee, subject to the schedule of modified conditions set out in Annexure “A” and the consolidated conditions as set out in Annexure “B”.

(3) The exhibits, other than exhibits A, C, 2, 3 and 4, may be returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.