| [2018] FWCA 2083 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Programmed Industrial Maintenance
(AG2017/5323)
PROGRAMMED INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE KWINANA NICKEL REFINERY SERVICES AGREEMENT 2017-2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 11 APRIL 2018 |
Application for approval of the Programmed Industrial Maintenance Kwinana Nickel Refinery Services Agreement 2017-2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Programmed Industrial Maintenance Kwinana Nickel Refinery Services Agreement 2017-2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Programmed Industrial Maintenance. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 11 April 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 18 April 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 April 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427963 PR601922>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Programmed Industrial Maintenance [2018] FWCA 2083
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2083
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement did not include provisions for the payment of penalty rates for public holidays, which was a term of the relevant award. The Commission also found that the agreement did not adequately address the issue of redundancy payments, which was a matter of significant concern to the union and its members. The Commission considered that the proposed agreement was not in the best interests of the employees and was not fair and reasonable. The Commission rejected the application for approval of the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission rejected the application for approval of the proposed agreement. The Commission found that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act and was not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also found that the agreement was not fair and reasonable, and did not adequately address the issues of public holiday penalty rates and redundancy payments. The Commission's decision was based on its consideration of the relevant factors set out in the Act, and its assessment of the proposed agreement in the context of the dispute between the parties. The Commission's decision was final and binding on both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.