Procon Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd v Seeley

Case [2013] VCC 1922

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Rubana Holdings Pty Ltd v 3D Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1405
Citation 1

…n contract; ( See Falgat Pty Ltd v Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 49 and Rubana Holdings Pty Ltd v 3D Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1405). 13The present proceeding was commenced by originating motion, which the Rules generally require for a claim which is based on a claim made by statu…
Falgat Constructions Pty Ltd v Equity Australia Corp Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 49
Citation 2

…separate to an action which seeks to litigate other issues under a construction contract; ( See Falgat Pty Ltd v Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 49 and Rubana Holdings Pty Ltd v 3D Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1405). 13The present proceeding was commenced by originating motion, which…
Isis Projects v Clarence Street [2004] NSWSC 714
Citation 3

…in an article written by Mr Adrian Bellemore criticizing the decision of Einstein J in ISIS Projects Pty Ltd v Clarence Street Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 714. 9In that case, Einstein J considered whether arguments of an estoppel and defences under the Trade Practices Act were open to a defendant on a summary judgment cl…

AI Chat coming soon