[2014] FWCA 1804
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 24 March 2014.
The name of the Agreement has been corrected.
Laura Fitzpatrick
Associate to Senior Deputy President Richards
Dated 25 March 2014
[2014] FWCA 1804 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Probuild Civil Pty Ltd
(AG2014/502)
PROBUILD CIVIL PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT, 2014-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 MARCH 2014 |
Application for approval of the Probuild Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement, 2014-2018.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 6 March 2014 by Probuild Civil Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Probuild Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement, 2014-2018(“the Agreement”).
[2] On 20 March 2014, the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The consultation clause in the Agreement does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement and is attached to the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407304 PR548722>
- AGLC
- Probuild Civil Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1804
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1804
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement provided for a direct and meaningful consultation process as mandated by section 172 of the Fair Work Act, and whether the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees as required by the Act. Specifically, the court had to determine if the consultation process outlined in the agreement was sufficient to ensure meaningful participation of employees and if the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account various factors including the nature of the business, the bargaining power of the parties, and the impact on employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Probuild Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement, 2014-2018, did provide for a direct and meaningful consultation process. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for the formation of a joint consultative committee and outlined procedures for communication and negotiation between the employer and employees. Furthermore, the Commission considered the terms of the agreement to be fair and reasonable, noting that they provided adequate protections for employees and balanced the interests of both parties. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.
In approving the Probuild Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement, 2014-2018, the Fair Work Commission ordered that the agreement be registered with the Commission, thereby making it a legally binding enterprise agreement between Probuild Civil Pty Ltd and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.