Price v Arktos Pty Ltd
[2004] FCAFC 120
•10 MAY 2004
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Price v Arktos Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 120DAVID IAN PRICE v ARKTOS PTY LTD and LINDA DAVIES
W135 of 2003
CARR, TAMBERLIN & RD NICHOLSON JJ
10 MAY 2004
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
W135 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
DAVID IAN PRICE
APPELLANTAND:
ARKTOS PTY LTD (ACN 093 410 247)
FIRST RESPONDENTLINDA DAVIES
SECOND RESPONDENTJUDGES:
CARR, TAMBERLIN & RD NICHOLSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
10 MAY 2004
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
W135 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
DAVID IAN PRICE
APPELLANTAND:
ARKTOS PTY LTD (ACN 093 410 247)
FIRST RESPONDENTLINDA DAVIES
SECOND RESPONDENTJUDGES:
CARR, TAMBERLIN & RD NICHOLSON JJ
DATE:
10 MAY 2004
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
The appellant appeals against certain costs orders which were made by the primary judge at first instance in the same proceedings described in appeal W89 of 2003 in which judgment was delivered today.
The circumstances are described in our reasons for that judgment.
It was common ground that if we allowed the appeal in appeal No W89 of 2003, then this appeal should be dismissed.
We have allowed the appeal in W89 of 2003 and for that reason we dismiss this appeal.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Court . Associate:
Dated: 10 May 2004
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr D M Stone Solicitors for the Appellants: Messrs Williams & Hughes Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr J C Curthoys Solicitors for the Respondent: Messrs Karp Steedman Ross-Adjie Date of Hearing: 25 November 2003 Date of Judgment: 10 May 2004
0
0
0