Pressure Tankers P/L v Collector of Customs

Case [1992] FCA 899


! ;

JUDGMENT No. . . ~ ~ ~ I I . I l .I?&C r
IN TIIE F E D E m COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) No. QG 1 3 9 of 1992
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY )
GENERAL DIVISION 1
On appeal from the General Administrative Division 0 -
of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted
by Senior Member D.W. Muller, . J.D. Horrigan i
(Member) and Captain E.T. Keane (Member) !
BETWEEN: PRESSURE TANKERS PTY. LTD.

Applicant

AND:  COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Respondent

MINUTES OF ORDERS

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:  Drummond J
DATE OF ORDER:  30 November,
WHERE MADE:  Brisbane
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 

1 ;

1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal i
given on 19 August, 1992 be set aside. 1
1 -
2 . The matter be remitted to the respondent for I
reconsideration.
!
NOTE:  Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in
Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) No. QG 139 of 1992
OUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY 1
GENERAL DIVISION )

On appeal from the General Administrative Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal constituted by Senior Member D.W. Muller, Mr. J.D. Horrigan (Member) and Captain E.T. Keane (Member)

BETWEEN: PRESSURE TANKERS PTY. LTD.

Applicant

AND:  COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Respondent

Corm:  Drummond J
Date:  30 November, 1992

W: ~risbane

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

This appeal raises the same question as that in Pozzolanic Enterprises Ptv. Ltd. v Collector of Customs, QG 138 of 1992. The appeal against the Tribunal's decision that "for the reasons given in Pozzolanic Enterprises Ptv. Ltd., Q91/463, the decision under review is affirmed" must be

matter has been allowed. allowed for the same reasons that the appeal in the Pozzolanic
I certify that this page is a true
copy of the reasons for judgment
herein of the Honourable Mr.
Justice Drummond.
Associate:
Date:  3; November, 1992
Details
AGLC
Pressure Tankers P/L v Collector of Customs [1992] FCA 899
Case
[1992] FCA 899
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pressure Tankers Pty. Ltd. (Applicant) appealed against a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) to the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute involved the applicant's challenge to a decision made by the Collector of Customs (Respondent). The AAT had upheld the Collector's decision, and the applicant sought review of that decision in the Federal Court.

The legal issue before the court was whether the AAT's decision was correct in affirming the Collector's decision. The applicant argued that the AAT had erred in its decision-making process and that the Collector's decision was not supported by the evidence. The court had to determine if the AAT had exercised its discretion properly and whether the decision was reasonable.

The court found that the AAT's decision was flawed for the same reasons as in the Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty. Ltd. v Collector of Customs case. The court determined that the AAT had not exercised its discretion properly and that the Collector's decision was not supported by the evidence. The court set aside the AAT's decision and remitted the matter back to the Collector for reconsideration.

The court's final order was to set aside the AAT's decision and to remit the matter back to the Collector for reconsideration. The court did not make any additional orders in this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.