PRESCOTT
v
FINLEY & ANOR
[2020] HCASL 77
S337/2019
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to file an application for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Family Court of Australia. An appeal to this Court would enjoy insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. Hence, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M Bell S.J Gageler 18 March 2020
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Prescott v Finley and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] HCASL 77
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court reasoned that the applicant's appeal to the High Court would enjoy insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. As a result, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that was sought. The court held that special leave should be refused, and that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant. The court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application, pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The final orders were that the application for special leave to appeal from the Family Court of Australia was dismissed, and the application for an extension of time within which to file the application was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.