[2013] FWCA 10077 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10433)
PRECISION PAINTING GROUP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 20 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 December 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406044 PR546158>
- AGLC
- Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 10077
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 10077
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In examining these issues, the Fair Work Commission looked at various aspects of the agreement, including the bargaining process, the content of the agreement, and the fairness of the terms. The court considered evidence from both the employer and the employees' representatives regarding the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement. The Commission also took into account the principles of good faith bargaining and the objectives of the Fair Work Act, which are to promote high levels of employment and to encourage cooperative and productive workplace relations.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and was fairly negotiated. The court found that the agreement met the criteria for being a simple, fair and efficient workplace agreement. Furthermore, the Commission determined that none of the terms in the agreement were unfair, unreasonable or inequitable. Based on these findings, the court approved the Precision Painting Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 to 2016 as a registered agreement. The decision provides clarity for both the employer and the employees regarding their rights and obligations under the agreement, and ensures that the agreement is legally enforceable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.