Poulos v Hacide P/L

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

POULOS

v

HACIDE P/L & ANOR

[2020] HCASL 204
S108/2020

  1. An extension of time of nearly thirty years is required for this application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to proceed. The proposed grounds of appeal have no prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
14 October 2020
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Poulos v Hacide P/L and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] HCASL 204
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Poulos v Hacide P/L, the applicant sought an extension of time to lodge an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The applicant was requesting an extension of nearly thirty years to proceed with the appeal, and the legal issues before the court involved the assessment of the merits of the proposed grounds of appeal, the likelihood of success, and the potential futility of granting the extension. The court had to consider whether the proposed grounds of appeal had any prospects of success and whether granting the extension of time would be futile. The High Court found that the proposed grounds of appeal had no prospects of success and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. As a result, the application was dismissed, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision highlights the importance of timely and diligent legal proceedings and the need for applicants to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success in their proposed grounds of appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.