POUDYAL (Migration)

[2018] AATA 100

POUDYAL (Migration) [2018] AATA 100 (18 January 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mrs Lalita POUDYAL

CASE NUMBER:  1707732

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2016/1997949

MEMBER:Wan Shum

DATE:18 January 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

Statement made on 18 January 2018 at 2:22pm

CATCHWORDS
Migration – Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) visa – Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)) – No appearance at hearing

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 362B(1A) (b), 362C(5)

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 20 March 2017 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) Subclass 457 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. On 3 January 2018 the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.

3. The applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.

4. As the applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.

   DECISION

5. The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.

   Wan Shum
   Member