Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
-
Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd
[1989] FCA 54
Citation 1
…Relying on the decision of Pincus J in Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd & Anor (1988) ATPR 40-853, counsel for the respondent submitted that paras 19-28 inclusive of the statement of claim should be struck out because, on their face, they pleaded a cause of action which had accrued more than 3 years before the commencement of the proceedings.…
-
Hawkins v Clayton
[1988] HCA 15
Citation 2
…h leads me to think that I should vary the orders made by me in Darwin is that there are dicta in the decision of the High Court in Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 62 ALJR 240 which might afford the basis for an argument that the decision of Pincus J has no application to a case such as the present. It is part of the applic…
-
Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd
[1985] FCA 278
Citation 3
…dor Park Shopping Centre This practice was referred to by Pincus J himself in an earlier decision in the Keen Mar litigation - see Keen Pty Ltd & Ors (1985) 61 ALR 504 at 507. This decision was not referred to in argument in Darwin. In the present case, the matter has not yet proceeded to trial. The general rule oug…
-
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW)
[1964] HCA 69
Citation 4
…the Trade Practices - Act would be summarily terminated. As is pointed out in General Steel Industries Inc. v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) & Ors. (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 128 et seq., the jurisdiction to summarily terminate an action is to be sparingly employed and is not to be used except where the claim is so obvi…
Legislation Cited
0
- No legislation cited in this judgment.