Potts and Repatriation Commission
[2000] AATA 183
•9 March 2000
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2000] AATA 183
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No V1997/1109
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION )
Re MADGE BORD POTTS
Applicant
And REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Commodore B.G. Gibbs, AM, RAN (Retd), Senior Member
Date9 March 2000
PlaceMelbourne
Decision The Tribunal decides as follows: (a) That the decision under review be varied so as to provide that chronic solar skin damage of hands is war-caused pursuant to section 9 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986; (b) That the applicant is incapacitated from chronic solar skin damage of hands for which the Commonwealth is liable to pay pension in accordance with the Act from 10 April 1996; (c) That in all other respects the decision under review is affirmed; (d) That the issue of assessment of rate of pension payable to the applicant be remitted to the respondent for determination.
(Sgd.) B.G. GIBBS
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS' APPEALS – Entitlement – Chronic Solar Skin Damage – whether war-caused – decision varied.
Words and Phrases: "Solar UV damage factor ratio"
Veterans' Entitlement Act 1986, ss. 6, 7, 9, 13, 120(4), 120B
Statement of Principles Instrument No. 34 of 1996 ("Chronic Solar Skin Damage")
REASONS FOR DECISION
9 March 2000 Commodore B.G. Gibbs, AM, RAN (Retd), Senior Member
Introduction
This is an application by Madge Bord Potts for review of the decision of a delegate of the respondent dated 6 September 1996, affirmed by the Veterans' Review Board on 21 July 1997, that Chronic Solar Skin Damage to many sites is not war-caused within the meaning of section 9 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 ("the Act"), and that no pension was payable at that time for the accepted disability malignant melanoma of the skin of various sites.
RepresentationAt the hearing Mrs Potts was represented by her solicitor, Mr D. De Marchi. The respondent was initially represented by Mr E. Nyhof and later by Mr K. Rudge, both of the Advocacy Branch, Department of Veterans' Affairs.
MaterialThe Tribunal had before it documents ("the T documents") lodged by the respondent pursuant to section 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
Other material was also before the Tribunal, as follows:
· Report by Dr T. Connors dated 22 December 1997 (Exhibit A1);
· Lifestyle Questionnaire signed by Mrs Potts on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit A2);
· Solar Damage Assessment signed by Mrs Potts on 15 January 1998 (Exhibit A3);
· Australian Radiation Laboratory – Information re UV Risk Version 3.3 (Exhibit R1).
Witnesses
Mrs Potts gave oral evidence at the hearing, as did her husband George Jeffrey Potts. No other witnesses were called.
Matters Not In DisputeThe following matters relevant to this review are not in dispute:
· That Mrs Potts was born on 15 May 1921 in Australia, of English parents;
· That Mrs Potts served in the Women's Auxiliary Australian Air Force ("WAAF") from 7 October 1942 to 19 November 1945;
· That while serving in the WAAF Mrs Potts held the rank of Aircraftwoman and that her Category/Mustering was that of Telegraphist;
· That after joining the WAAF on 7 October 1942 Mrs Potts was first posted to Southern Area Headquarters and then, in April 1945, she was posted to Mildura, Victoria, until her discharge on 19 November 1945.
Standard of Proof
Mrs Potts rendered what is termed "eligible war service" within the meaning of section 7 of the Act. She did not, however, render what is termed "operational service" within the meaning of section 6. That being so, the Tribunal is required to determine matters relevant to the review to its reasonable satisfaction pursuant to section 120(4) of the Act. A standard of proof on the balance of probabilities is therefore applicable (Smith v Repatriation Commission (1997) 74 ALR 537).
Section 120B of the Act, to which reference is made in the Note to section 120(4), provides that it applies to claims made on or after 1 June 1994. As Mrs Potts' claim was made on 10 July 1996, section 120B applies to her claim. Subsection 120B(3) provides as follows:
"(3) In applying subsection 120(4) to determine a claim, the Commission is to be reasonably satisfied that an injury suffered by a person, a disease contracted by a person or the death of a person was war-caused or defence-caused only if:
(a)the material before the Commission raises a connection between the injury, disease or death of the person and some particular service rendered by the person; and
(b)there is in force:
(i)a Statement of Principles determined under subsection 196B(3) or (12); or
(ii)a determination of the Commission under subsection 180A(3);
that upholds the contention that the injury, disease or death of the person is, on the balance of probabilities, connected with that service."
Statement of Principles ("SoP")
The relevant SoP in respect of this review is Instrument No. 34 of 1996, concerning Chronic Solar Skin Damage. It is noted that the SoP is dated 14 March 1996 and that it remained the effective SoP at the time of the primary decision in respect of Mrs Potts' claim, being a decision which, as I have earlier indicated, was made on 6 September 1996.
SoP No. 34 of 1996 defines "chronic solar skin damage" as meaning a range of pathological skin changes, including solar keratosis and dermatosis, attracting ICD code 692.74 or 702.0.
SoP No. 34 of 1996 further provides as follows:
"Basis for determining the factors
3.On the sound medical-scientific evidence available, the Repatriation Medical Authority is of the view that it is more probable than not that chronic solar skin can be related to relevant service rendered by veterans or members of the Forces."
"Factors that must be related to service
4.Subject to clause 6, the factors set out in at least one of the paragraphs in clause 5 must be related to any relevant service rendered by the person."
"Factors
5.The factors that must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, chronic solar skin damage or death from chronic solar skin damage is connected with the circumstances of a person's relevant service are:
(a) having a solar UV damage factor ratio of at least 1.2; or
(b)inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for the chronic solar skin damage."
"Factors that apply only to material contribution or aggravation
6.Paragraph 5(b) applies only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, chronic solar skin damage where the person's chronic solar skin damage was suffered or contracted before or during (but not arising out of) the person's relevant service; paragraph 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e) or 70(5)(d) of the Act refers."
SoP No. 34 of 1996 also advises as follows:
" "solar UV damage factor ratio" means the value obtained by applying the solar UV damage factor ratio formula. This may be calculated by using the computer program, UV Risk Version 3.3 (created by the Australian Radiation Laboratory using Microsoft Visual Basic Programming System for Windows Professional Edition, Version 3.0) to the data concerning the exposure of the person to ultra violet (UV) radiation."
Evidence
As I have indicated earlier, evidence was given at the hearing by Mrs Potts and her husband, although it must be said the evidence of Mr Potts added little if anything to that given earlier by Mrs Potts.
In addition to the oral evidence of Mr and Mrs Potts, the Tribunal had before it a Solar Damage Assessment signed by Mrs Potts on 15 January 1998 (Exhibit A3).
Having received oral evidence the Tribunal then received submissions in the form of the data necessary to run the UV Risk Version 3.3 computer program.
Having made its submissions orally the respondent very helpfully translated the substance of its submissions into tabular form (see Annexure A).
While the majority of the data relied upon by the respondent in Annexure A is not in dispute between the parties, it should be recorded that Mr De Marchi did, however, dispute the respondent's submissions in respect of ground cover and several body exposure factors namely in respect of the face, back, arms and legs. Annexure A records in brackets the various exposure factors disputed by Mr De Marchi.
FindingsAs was stated by the respondent, "Ground Cover" definitions are included in SoP No. 34 of 1996 (Table 12) and "Body Exposure Factor" is a factor in the range from 0 to 1.00, which includes the level of sunlight exposure by reference to the clothing worn at a particular site of the body. A factor of 1.00 indicates no clothing protection and the factor zero indicates full coverage with heavy clothing. With this in mind and after consideration of the material before me, which includes the Solar Damage Assessment signed by Mrs Potts on 15 January 1998, I consider that in addition to all other details included in Annexure A, the Ground Cover and Body Exposure Factors contended by the respondent are correct and I find accordingly.
DirectionHaving made the abovementioned findings of fact the Tribunal directed that such findings be entered into the UV Risk Version 3.3 computer program.
Computer Program ResultOn 26 November 1999, the Tribunal's findings were entered into the "UV Risk Version 3.3" computer program to calculate the "solar UV damage factor ratio" applicable to Mrs Potts' face, hands, back, arms and legs. The computer printout results are recorded in Annexure C.
As indicated in paragraph 11 above, factor 5(a) of SoP No. 34 of 1996 refers to a veteran "having a solar UV damage factor ratio of at least 1.2" as a factor which may connect a veteran's service with chronic solar skin damage.
As further indicated, SoP No. 34 of 1996 defines the "solar UV damage factor ratio formula" as: "total lifetime UV damage factor/non-service UV damage factor". In this connection the respondent correctly submitted that:
"If a veteran had no increased risk of solar UV exposure the relevant "solar UV damage factor ratio" would be 1. Where service conditions involved a greater ultra violet exposure than the veteran's civilian environment the solar UV damage factor ratio applicable to the veteran would be greater than one. A solar UV damage factor ratio of 1.2 represents a 20% service-related increase in risk of ultra violet exposure over the veteran's whole of life non-service exposure."
After the Tribunal's findings of fact were entered into the UV Risk Version 3.3 program, the results (as reported by the respondent on 26 November 1999), were that Mrs Potts had increased risks of ultra violet exposure as follows:
Face 15.32%
Hands 23.19%
Back 0
Arms 12.74%
Legs 12.74%
The solar UV damage factor ratio for Mrs Potts' hands is 1.2319. The ratios for the face, back, arms and legs are 1.1532, 1.1274 and 1.1274 respectively.
It was the respondent's submission that, as the solar UV damage factor ratio for Mrs Potts' hands is more than 1.2, chronic solar skin damage of the hands should be accepted as war-caused with effect from 10 April 1996, being a date three months prior to the date Mrs Potts lodged a claim to have malignant melanoma of the skin of various sites, and chronic solar skin damage to many sites, accepted as war-caused.
It was the respondent's further submission that as the relevant ratios for Mrs Potts' face, arms, back and legs are less than 1.2, chronic solar skin damage at those sites is not war-caused.
Factor 5(b) – SoP No. 34 of 1996When giving oral evidence Mrs Potts stated that during her service in the WAAF she was not given any training concerning exposure to the sun, but that "50 years ago it was not considered". She said that the sun was "just there" and that "nobody ever worried about it".
It was contended on her behalf that these facts satisfied factor 5(b) of SoP No. 34 of 1996 as set out in paragraph 11 above:
"5 (b)inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for the chronic skin damage."
Paragraph 6 of the SoP provides that:
"Paragraph 5(b) applies only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, chronic solar skin damage where the person's chronic solar skin damage was suffered or contracted before or during (but not arising out of) the person's relevant service; paragraph 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e) or 70(5)(d) of the Act refers."
It was the respondent's submission that Mrs Potts did not suffer from chronic solar skin damage before or during her eligible service and, therefore, factor 5(b) is not applicable. The respondent's submission, as set out in a document dated 1 October 1999, is as follows:
"5. The heading of Instrument No. 34 of 1996 is:
Statement of Principles
concerning
CHRONIC SOLAR SKIN DAMAGE
ICD CODES: 692.74, 702.06. Paragraph 2(b) of the SoP provides that:
"For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, "chronic solar skin damage" means a range of pathological skin changes, including solar keratosis and dermatosis, attracting ICD code 692.74 or 702.0."
7.Paragraph 7 of the SoP directs that:
"For the purposes of this Statement of Principles:
"ICD code" means a number assigned to a particular kind of injury or disease in the Australian Version of The International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), effective date of 1 July 1995, copyrighted by the National Coding Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, and having ISBN 0 642 22235 5".8.In the above version of The International Classification of Diseases (extracts attached) ICD 692.74 is the code number for:
"Other chronic dermatitis due to solar radiation
Chronic solar skin damage NOS (not otherwise specified)Solar elastosis"
ICD 702.0 is the code number for:
"Actinic keratosis"9.There is evidence that the applicant suffered sunburn during service. The ICD code for sunburn is 692.71. Sunburn is not covered by Statement of Principles No.34 of 1996. It is an acute, but not chronic, condition which resolves a week or so after development.
10.There is evidence that the applicant suffered chronic solar skin damage from about the mid-1970s, but there is no evidence that she suffered from chronic solar skin damage before or during eligible service. Factor 5(b) of the SoP is not, therefore, applicable.
11.In addition, there was not an "inability to obtain appropriate clinical management" of a skin condition during the applicant's service. The applicant said that no one worried about it 50 years ago. There is no evidence to suggest that she was unable to obtain treatment. She appears to have had the same opportunity to obtain treatment as other people at that time and she may not have sought treatment."
It is noted that this submission was made prior to the date of the respondent's submissions (26 November 1999) in respect of factor 5(a) of the SoP, that is to say before the results of the computer program became known in respect of the solar UV damage factor ratio for Mrs Potts' hands.
I accept the respondent's submissions in respect of factor 5(b) and find accordingly.
AssessmentIn a letter dated 24 January 2000 the respondent submitted as follows:
"Assessment of rate of pension has not previously been the focus of investigation by the applicant or the respondent. The parties had been dealing with the computer program and the entitlement issues. Consequently there is an inadequacy of material for properly assessing pension. There has been no recent GARP examination and the most recent hearing test was on 15 July 1997 (T16/62). In these circumstances the respondent respectfully requests that assessment of rate of pension be remitted to the Repatriation Commission."
I agree with the submission. The Tribunal will therefore direct that the issue of assessment be remitted accordingly.
Decision
The Tribunal will decide as follows:
(a)That the decision under review be varied so as to provide that chronic solar skin damage of hands is war-caused pursuant to section 9 of the Act;
(b)That Mrs Potts is incapacitated from chronic solar skin damage of hands for which the Commonwealth is liable to pay pension in accordance with the Act, from 10 April 1996;
(c)That the issue of assessment of rate of pension payable be remitted to the respondent for determination;
(d)That in all other respects the decision under review is affirmed.
I certify that the 32 preceding paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for the decision herein of:
Commodore B.G. Gibbs, AM, RAN (Retd), Senior Member
Signed: .....................................................................................
Personal AssistantDate/s of Hearing 3/2/99 & 14/7/99
Date of Decision 9/3/00
Counsel for the Applicant Mr D. De Marchi
Solicitor for the Applicant De Marchi & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent Mr E. Nyhof and Mr K. Rudge
Solicitor for the Respondent Department of Veterans' Affairs
Madge Potts V97/1109 Location Outdoor Environment Daylight Exposure Factor Body Exposure Factor
Situation Ground Cover Shade Face Hand Back Arms Legs
Whole of the Veteran's life Working Week Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Moderate Indoor 0% 1.00 1.00 0 0.50 (0 on upper arms 0.50 (0)
Weekend Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Moderate Mainly Indoor 25% 1.00 1.00 0 0.50 (0 on upper arms 0.50 (0)
Annual Recreation Leave Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Moderate Indoor and Outdoor 50% 0.50 1.00 0 0.50 (0 above elbow .5 below) 0.50 (0 above knees .5 below knees)
Service Periods 7/10/42 to 15/6/45 Working Week Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Light Indoor and Outdoor 50% 0.75 (1.00) 1.00 0 0.25 (0.50) 0.25 (0.50)
Weekend Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Light Indoor and Outdoor 50% 0.50 (1.00) 1.00 0 (0.75) 0.75 (1.00 below elbow) 0.75 (1.00 below knee)
Annual Recreation Leave Melbourne Urban Brown (Black) Light Indoor and Outdoor 50% 0.50 (1.00) 1.00 0 (0.75) 0.75 (1.00 below elbow) 0.75 (1.00 below knee)
Madge Potts V97/1109 Location Outdoor Environment Daylight Exposure Factor Body Exposure Factor
Situation Ground Cover Shade Face Hand Back Arms Legs
Service Periods 16/6/45 to 19/11/45 Working Week Mildura Rural Brown (Sand) None Indoor and Outdoor 50% 1.00 1.00 0 0.50 (1.00 below elbow) 0.50 (1.00 below knee)
Weekend Mildura Rural Brown (Sand) None Indoor and Outdoor 50% 1.00 1.00 0 (0.75) 0.75 (1.00 below elbow) 0.75 (1.00 below knee)
Annual Recreation Leave Mildura Rural Brown (Sand) None Indoor and Outdoor 50% 1.00 1.00 0 (0.75) 0.75 (1.00 below elbow) 0.75 (1.00 below knee)
ANNEXURE B
UV Risk Version 3.3
"Enter Data"
A.Personal Details
Name, Repatriation number, date of birth, Age (calculated by the program)
"Service Periods" (If the veteran served in different locations during service each location is a separate "service period").
"No weekends or recreation leave during service" (Tick or delete tick)
"Service Dates" Enter dates of each of the "service periods".
Click "OK" upon completing a screen.
B. The Whole of the Veteran's Life
The Four Sets of Data below are required for the whole of the veteran's life in relation to "Work/working week", "Weekend" and "Annual Recreation Leave" (the four sets are required in C. below in relation to the Service Period)
Work Location
Relates to the veteran's residential locations during the whole of his or her life.
"Work Period": Number of days in a working week (eg. 5, 6, 7 or otherwise) Location and Latitude for each of the age periods indicated. (As a guide note the definition of "PAE" in the SOP: "an estimate of a typical month during each of the five year periods between the ages of 0 and 20 years and each of the ten year periods thereafter").
Work Location Environment
Outdoor Environment: Situation, Ground Cover and Shade
Relates to the veteran's whole life in five year periods and ten year periods as described above. Select the appropriate description from each of the categories: Situation, Ground Cover and Shade.
(a)"Situation" – See "Environment Reflectance Factor" in the SoP and definitions of "Urban", "Rural" and "Maritime".
"Urban" means a location that is either a city or a town;
"Rural"means a location that is bushland, pastoral, or agricultural setting;
"Maritime"means either on the sea, lake, major river, or directly adjacent to such a body of water.
(b)"Ground Cover" – See "Terrain Reflectance Factor" in the SoP and definitions of "Black", "Brown", "Green", "Open Water", "Sand" and "Snow".
"Black" means a terrain predominantly of black material such as asphalt;
"Brown" means a terrain predominantly of bare soil, clay, or buildings;
"Green" means a terrain predominantly of green vegetation;
"Open means an environment surrounded by water;
Water"
"Sand"means a terrain predominantly of light material such as white or yellow sand;
"Snow"means a terrain that is predominantly covered in snow
(c) "Shade" – See "Environment Shade Factor" in the SoP and definitions of "Dense shade", "Moderate shade", "Light shade" and "No shade".
"Dense shade" means a location that is predominantly under dense shade, such as jungle or dense forest;
"Moderate shade" means a location that is predominantly under moderate shade, such as open forest or high density housing;
"Light shade" means a location that is predominantly under light shade, such as lightly timbered country or low density housing;
"No shade"means a location that is predominantly without shade, such as open fields, tundra, beach, or ocean
Work – Daylight Exposure Factors
Relates to the veteran's whole life in five year periods and ten year periods as described above.
"Modify" default settings in "Work – New Daylight Exposure Factors". Select the appropriate description from the categories:
"Indoor 0%", "Mainly Indoor 25%", "Indoor & Outdoor 50%", "Mainly Outdoor 75%" or "Outdoor 100%".
Work – Body Exposure Factors
Relates to the veteran's whole life in five year periods and ten year periods as described above.
"Exposure Factors" are entered for the Face, Hand, Back, Arms and Legs. See "Clothing Protection Factor" in the SoP which provides:
" "CPFn" is the clothing protection factor, and has the value assigned to a particular anatomical site proportionately according to the amount of protection provided by clothing and sun screen, ranging from a value of 1.00 for no protection to a value of 0.05 for full cover with heavy clothing".
C.The Service Period or Periods
The Four Sets of Data outlined above are required for each of the veteran's service periods in relation to the "Service Work", "Service Weekend" and "Service Annual Recreation Leave" (the "Service Weekend" and "Service Annual Recreation Leave" will not be applicable if the "No weekends or recreation leave during service" box on the first screen has been ticked).
D.Claimed Affected Body Sites
Tick Face, Hand, Back, Arm and/or Leg as appropriate.
E.Evaluate
Click on "Evaluate" to produce a percentage change in risk due to service activity.
UV Risk 3.3 – Service Risk Summary- Friday, 26 November 1999 at 02:00 PM (PC clock time)
Name: MADGE POTTS
Born: 15 May 1921 Age: 78.535
Repatriation Number: V97/1109
2 separate service periods between 7 October 1942 and 19 November 1945
Percentage Increase in Risk due to Service Activity at Age 78.535:
Face Hand Back Arm Leg
15.32 23.19 0.00 12.74 12.74
Service Parameters:
Activity Days Period Location Latitude Site Ground Shade %Out Face Hand Back Arm Leg
Service 1 from 7 October 1942 to 15 June 1945
Work 6 1942 to 1943 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.25
Work 6 1943 to 1944 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.25
Work 6 1944 to 1945 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.25
Weekend 1 1942 to 1943 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Weekend 1 1943 to 1944 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Weekend 1 1944 to 1945 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Recreation - Service 1
04 Apr 1 1942 to 1943 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
04 Apr 1 1943 to 1944 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
04 Apr 1 1944 to 1945 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Light 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Service 2 from 16 June 1945 to 19 November 1945
Work 6 1945 to 1945 Mildura -34.1 Rural Brown None 50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 1 1945 to 1945 Mildura -34.1 Rural Brown None 50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Recreation - Service 2
04 Apr 1 1945 to 1945 Mildura -34.1 Rural Brown None 50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75
Normal (Non-Service) Parameters:
Activity Days Period Location Latitude Site Ground Shade %Out Face Hand Back Arm Leg
Work 5 1921 to 1925 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1926 to 1930 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1931 to 1935 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1936 to 1940 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1941 to 1950 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1951 to 1960 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1961 to 1970 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1971 to 1980 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1981 to 1990 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Work 5 1991 to 1999 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1921 to 1925 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1926 to 1930 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1931 to 1935 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1936 to 1940 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1941 to 1950 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1951 to 1960 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1961 to 1970 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1971 to 1980 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1981 to 1990 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Weekend 2 1991 to 1999 Melbourne VIC .37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
Recreation - Normal
04 Apr 14 1921 to 1925 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1926 to 1930 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1931 to 1935 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1936 to 1940 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1941 to 1950 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1951 to 1960 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1961 to 1970 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1971 to 1980 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1981 to 1990 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
04 Apr 14 1991 to 1999 Melbourne VIC -37.8 Urban Brown Mod. 50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.50
0