Poreddy (Migration)
[2020] AATA 2764
•2 June 2020
Poreddy (Migration) [2020] AATA 2764 (2 June 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Sai Kiran Reddy Poreddy
CASE NUMBER: 1917901
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2019/1999247
MEMBER:Stephen Witts
DATE:2 June 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
Statement made on 02 June 2020 at 11:55am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION - Student (Temporary) (Class TU) – Subclass 500 – insufficient funds – father’s affidavit provided – evidence of financial capacity not provided – no explanation on how COVID 19 lockdown in home country prevented provision of evidence – decision under review affirmedLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.214
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 20 June 2019 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 18 April 2019. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl. 500.214 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the delegate was not satisfied that the applicant had genuine access to sufficient funds for his stay and study in Australia.
The Tribunal exercised its discretion to hold the hearing by telephone. The hearing was held during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal determined it was reasonable to hold a hearing by telephone, having regard to the nature of this matter and the individual circumstances of the applicant. The Tribunal also had regard to the Tribunal’s objective of providing a mechanism of review that is fair, just, and economical and quick, and the delay to the matter if the hearing was not to be conducted by telephone. The applicant did not raise any concerns as to conducting a review hearing by phone. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was given a fair opportunity to give evidence and present arguments.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal by telephone on 2 June 2020 to give evidence and present arguments.
The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Telegu (Indian) and English languages.
The applicant was assisted in relation to the review by their registered migration agent.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant has genuine access to sufficient funds.
Genuine access to funds (cl.500.214)
Clause 500.214 requires the applicant to meet certain financial requirements. If the applicant is required to do so by the Minister, they must give evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements set out in an instrument: cl.500.214(3). All primary applicants must also satisfy the Tribunal that, while they hold the visa, sufficient funds will be available to meet their costs and expenses during their intended stay in Australia, as well as the costs and expenses of any members of their family unit who will be in Australia: cl.500.214(2). The Tribunal must also be satisfied that the applicant will have genuine access to the relevant kinds of funds.
In the present case, the Minister has required the applicant to give evidence of financial capacity in accordance with cl.500.214(3).
Has the applicant provided evidence of financial capacity in accordance with the instrument?
The requirements for evidence of financial capacity for cl.500.214(3) are set out in LIN 19/198, which is attached to this decision.
At hearing the applicant provided evidence of an enrolment in a Certificate III in Commercial Cookery which began on 15 May 2020 and is due for completion on 14 May 2021. He also provided an enrolment in a Certificate IV in Commercial Cookery due to begin on 15 June 2021 and complete on 20 March 2022.
The tuition fee for his current course, a Certificate III in Commercial Cookery, has a tuition fee of AU$8250 of which he still is required to pay AU$7250. As the applicant also needs to demonstrate that he has sufficient funds for living costs of AU$21,041, and for his travel cost of AU$1000 he therefore needs a total of AU$29,291. This was acknowledged in the statement provided by the applicant’s representative, on behalf of the applicant.
The applicant has also provided an affidavit of support from his father dated 26 May 2020.
At hearing the Tribunal had a discussion with the applicant about his access to funds noting that there was no evidence regarding any bank statements, financial institution material, or any other evidence that the applicant was providing in regard to evidence for the funds necessary for his stay and study here in Australia over the next 12 months.
The Tribunal notes that the applicant’s representative wrote to the Tribunal on 1 June 2020, asking for an adjournment of this matter citing issues relating to the COVID-19 pandemic in India making it difficult for the applicant to provide information from the relevant financial institution. The Tribunal considered this request for adjournment and refused it.
The Tribunal turns to consider this issue. The High Court of Australia (HCA) in MIAC v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 gave consideration to the factors relevant in a request for adjournment. The High Court held that the Tribunal must not arbitrarily exercise its discretion whether or not to grant an adjournment but rather must do so by reference to the facts and circumstances of the individual case and in a manner which is reasonable and has regard to the statutory purposes of s. 360. In considering reasonableness, the court considered the Tribunal statutory purpose to conduct a review in a manner that “is fair, just, economical, informal and quick”.
The Tribunal is of course generally aware due to press reporting of the lockdown in this country and other countries, including India, because of this pandemic. The applicant did not make any material available to the Tribunal that outlined the duration, extent or impact of the lockdown in India. The applicant did not make the Tribunal aware of whether the lockdown was total or in part only, the applicant did not make the Tribunal aware of the lifting or partial relaxation of the lockdown, if such has occurred at any time after this hearing date was set and prior to the date of decision. The applicant did not make any submission to the Tribunal on any aspect of the lockdown in India. The Tribunal notes that it had a specific discussion with the applicant and invited him to provide any evidence as to why he would have difficulty providing such financial institution information at the hearing. The applicant did not provide any evidence in this matter.
The applicant did not make the Tribunal aware as to the impact of the lockdown on the financial and banking sector in India. The applicant did not make the Tribunal aware of the impact of the lockdown on individual financial institutions. The applicant did not make the Tribunal aware of any reasons why he had been unable to download relevant bank statements which showed current balances. The applicant did not make the Tribunal aware as to why any such statements could not be provided of funds available via email. The applicant did not advise that the email system in India was not working effectively.
As stated above, the Tribunal has considered this matter very carefully, and finds that in this case the applicant was using the current health circumstances as a reason for not providing any such information to the Tribunal. On that basis the Tribunal finds that the applicant has not provided evidence of genuine access to sufficient funds for his stay and study here in Australia despite being given repeated opportunity to do so.
On the basis of the above, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.214(3).
Are there sufficient funds available to meet costs and expenses while the applicant holds the visa?
As above, the Tribunal finds that the applicant has not demonstrated that he has sufficient funds available to meet costs and expenses.
For these reasons, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.214(2).
Will the applicant have genuine access to the funds?
To meet cl.500.214(1), the Tribunal must also be satisfied that the applicant will have genuine access to the funds referred to above.
As above, the applicant has not demonstrated that he has genuine access to these funds.
As the Tribunal is not satisfied the applicant will have genuine access to the funds, cl.500.214(1) is not met.
Conclusion on cl.500.214
Accordingly, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.214.
Given the above findings, the Tribunal finds that the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are not met. The applicant does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa. Accordingly, the decision under review must be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
Stephen Witts
MemberAttachment – LIN 19/198 – Financial capacity instrument (extract)
6 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—primary applicants
(1)For the purposes of subclause 500.214(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a primary applicant must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsections (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
Note: For primary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument.
(2)The evidence of financial capacity
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of the primary applicant:
(i) travel expenses; and
(ii) the following living costs and expenses:
(A)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – AUD21,041 (annual living costs); and
(B)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and
(iii) the following course fees, minus any amount already paid:
(A)if the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is less than 12 months – the fees for the course of study or the remaining components of the course of study; or
(B)If the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is more than 12 months – course fees for the first 12 months of the period study in Australia; and
Note : The period of study is the period beginning at one of the following commencement periods and ending on the final day of the applicant’s final course of study:
(a)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced after the date of application – on the first day of the first course of study; or
(b)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced before the date of application – on the date of application.
(c)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary applicant:
(i) travel expenses; and
(ii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – the following costs (annual living costs):
(A)for a spouse or de facto partner - AUD7,362 and
(B)for a dependent child - AUD3,152; and
(iii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and
(iv) the following school fees for each school-age dependant:
(A)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for more than 12 months - AUD8,296 (annual school costs); or
(B)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual school costs, calculated as specified in section 11; or
(C)if the school-age dependant is enrolled in a course of study at a State or Territory government school where the fees have been waived, and the Primary Applicant is enrolled in a course as a doctoral degree student, a Foreign Affairs student, a Defence student or a Commonwealth sponsored student – nil.
Note: For secondary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary applicant’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income, in the 12 months immediately before the application is made, that is:
(i)if there is no secondary applicant– at least AUD62,222; or
(ii)if there is a secondary applicant – at least AUD72,592.
(4)The evidence of financial capacity is the primary applicant’s completed AASES form.
Note: AASES form is defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations to mean for a secondary exchange student, an Acceptance Advice of Secondary Exchange Student form from the relevant State or Territory education authority, containing the following declarations:
(a) a declaration made by the student’s exchange organisation, accepting the student;
(b) a declaration made by the student’s parent, or the person or persons having custody of the student, agreeing to the exchange.
(5)If the primary applicant is a Foreign Affairs student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
(6) If the primary applicant is a Defence student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Defence.
7 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—secondary applicants
(1)For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant who is included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
(2)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder set out in subparagraphs 6(2)(b)(i) to (iii) of this Part; and
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary student visa holder specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.
(4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(6)If:
(a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but
(b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;
then the evidence of financial capacity:
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the secondary applicant specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.
8 Subclass 500 (Student) visa – secondary applicants not included in the primary student visa holder’s application
(1) For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant (the first secondary applicant), who is not included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
(2) The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder specified in subparagraph 6(2)(b)(ii) of this Part; and
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet course fees for any component of the primary student visa holder’s course of study which will be completed while the first secondary applicant is in Australia, up to an amount equivalent to fees for 12 months of the course of study, minus any amount already paid; and
(d)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and
(e)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all additional secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.
(4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(6)If:
(a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but
(b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;
then the evidence of financial capacity:
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and
(d)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.
…
10 Evidence of financial capacity
The following forms of evidence of financial capacity are specified:
(a)money deposit with a financial institution;
(b)loan with a financial institution;
(c)government loans;
(d)scholarship or financial support.
11 Pro rata equivalent
In this Part, the pro rata equivalent of annual costs is calculated by:
(a)dividing the annual amount by 365; and
(b)multiplying the resulting number by the number of days the applicant is intending to stay in Australia.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
-
Statutory Construction
0
1
0