Pond and Thurga and Ors (No 2)
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 1241
•2 December 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pond and Thurga and Ors (No 2) [2009] FamCA 1241
[2009] FamCA 1241
2 December 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties involved were Pond and Thurga, with Thurga being the second respondent. The dispute concerned an application filed by the second respondent. The decision was made by Justice Rose.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the application filed by the second respondent.
Justice Rose dismissed the application. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text.
The court ordered that the Application in a Case filed on behalf of the second respondent be dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the application filed by the second respondent.
Justice Rose dismissed the application. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text.
The court ordered that the Application in a Case filed on behalf of the second respondent be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock [2010] SASCFC 59
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWCA 274