Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2)
[2005] VSCA 298
Citation 1
…y for the proposition that the principles set out by the Court of Appeal in Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 concerning Calderbank offers, are equally applicable to the question of determining whether a party’s rejection of an offer of compromise is unreasonab…
-
Hambleton v State Trustees Ltd
[2016] VSC 215
Citation 2
(Para 22)
…rejection of an offer of compromise is unreasonable ( Smith v Jovanoska (No 2) [2013] VSC 714 at [11] to [13] and Hambleton v State Trustees Ltd [2016] VSC 215 at [22]).…
-
Smith v Jovanoska (No 2)
[2013] VSC 714
Citation 3
(Para 11)
…qually applicable to the question of determining whether a party’s rejection of an offer of compromise is unreasonable ( Smith v Jovanoska (No 2) [2013] VSC 714 at [11] to [13] and Hambleton v State Trustees Ltd [2016] VSC 215 at [22]).…
-
Marshall v Berndt (No 2) (Ruling as to Costs)
[2011] VCC 1421
Citation 4
(Para 39)
…wholly failed: i.e. the agency, the notice period and the contractual interest claim. As noted in Marshall [ v Berndt (No 2) (Ruling as to Costs) [2011] VCC 1421 at [39]-[41]], there is no need to make an arithmetical assessment.”…