Police v Leonard

Case [2005] NSWLC 3


Local Court of New South Wales


CITATION: Police v Leonard [2005] NSWLC 3
JURISDICTION: Criminal
PARTIES: Police
Genevieve Anne Leonard
FILE NUMBER:
PLACE OF HEARING: Grafton Local Court
DATE OF DECISION:
02/22/2005
MAGISTRATE: Magistrate C Bone
CATCHWORDS: drive negligently - grievous bodily harm - death
LEGISLATION CITED: Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999
s 42 (1)
CASES CITED: R v Baker NSWCCA unreported 7 Feb 1985
Clout v Hutchinson 1950 51 SR (NSW) 32
Musgrove v Howard 78 NSWWN 88
REPRESENTATION: Sgt S Gerrish, Police Prosecutor
Mr R P O'Connor Solicitor for the Accused
ORDERS: I find the offence proved

Reasons for Decision

1    It is alleged against Genevieve Anne Leonard that at Woodburn on 4th July, 2003, she (a) drove negligently, (b) drove negligently and, as a result, grievous bodily harm was caused to Sarah Cooper and (c) drove negligently and, as a result, the death was caused of Joshua Paul Covell. The accused has pleaded not guilty. The statements of all police witnesses were admitted into evidence without objection together with a transcript of an interview between the prosecutor and the accused. The accused did not give evidence or call any witnesses.


    The Facts

2    The facts are not in dispute and are as follows. At about 4pm on Friday, 4th July, 2003, the accused was travelling alone in a white Ford Festiva motor sedan. She was driving south on the Pacific Highway and was a short distance south of Woodburn. The highway at that point is in rural surroundings and is governed by a 100km/hr speed limit. The accused was travelling at about 100km/hr. She came to a section of highway which had two south bound lanes. There was a single north bound lane and the north bound lane and the two south bound lanes were separated by unbroken double centre lines. The accused was travelling in the left hand lane (i.e. the lane closest to the side of the highway). Her vehicle, for no apparent reason, then turned sharply to the right, crossed the road and collided with a north bound vehicle. Joshua Covell, the driver of the north bound vehicle, died as a result of the collision and Sarah Cooper, a passenger in the north bound vehicle, sustained grievous bodily harm.

3    Karen Roots was driving south along the highway at the time of the collision. She was about 100 metres behind the accused’s vehicle. Her evidence was as follows:

        I noticed the white car in front of me was still the same distance in front and doing about the same speed. It was also in the left lane. All of a sudden the car looked as though it was trying to do a right hand u-turn. The car turned sharply to the right and onto the wrong side of the road .

4    Robert Lund was driving north along the highway at the time of the collision. His fiancée, Vicki Walker, was a passenger. They were travelling at about 100 km/hr and…

Continue reading Police v Leonard

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Police v Leonard [2005] NSWLC 3
Case
[2005] NSWLC 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Police v Leonard was heard in the Magistrates Court of Victoria. The respondent, Leonard, was charged with driving negligently causing grievous bodily harm, and subsequently death. The incident occurred when Leonard, while driving, caused a collision that resulted in severe injuries to the victim, who later succumbed to these injuries. The prosecution argued that Leonard's actions constituted negligent driving, leading to the grievous bodily harm and subsequent death of the victim. Leonard contested the charges, arguing that his driving was not negligent and that the accident was not his fault.

The legal issues before the court involved determining whether Leonard's driving was negligent and if this negligence directly led to the grievous bodily harm and subsequent death of the victim. The court had to consider the applicable legal standards for negligence in driving, the evidence presented regarding the circumstances of the accident, and the causal link between Leonard's driving and the injuries suffered by the victim. The court also needed to assess the credibility and weight of the evidence provided by both the prosecution and the defence.

The court found that Leonard's driving was indeed negligent, as evidenced by the circumstances of the accident and the injuries sustained by the victim. The court held that Leonard's actions directly contributed to the grievous bodily harm and subsequent death of the victim. The evidence presented was deemed sufficient to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court considered the nature of the injuries, the circumstances leading up to the collision, and the subsequent medical evidence regarding the victim's condition. Based on this, the court concluded that Leonard was responsible for the death of the victim due to his negligent driving.

The court found the offence proved and delivered a judgment accordingly. Leonard was found guilty of driving negligently causing grievous bodily harm, and subsequently death. The court's decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the evidence and the legal standards applicable to the case. The judgment reflects the court's determination that Leonard's actions met the criteria for the charged offence.

Orders

Orders of the court

I find the offence proved

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.