Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
R v Jake Lewis Andrew [No. 1]
[2018] NSWDC 381
Citation 1
…in my view given the very different and much broader definition of ‘firearm’ in NSW.[15] . The NSW definition is as follows- [14] [2018] NSWDC 381 (24 September 2018) per Haesler SC DCJ [15]The NSW Firearms Act 46/ 1996 s.4 definitions…
-
Davies v The Queen
[2014] VSCA 284
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…ication of what it is designed or adapted to do which will determine whether the item is a firearm – See Davies v The Queen [2014] VSCA 284 . (There is no suggestion in this case that the items in question were designed or adapted to do anything other than discharge gel balls. ii He examined the Lehui brand weapon…
-
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority
[1998] HCA 53
Citation 3
…nterpretation of legislation Act (Vic) 127/1984. [20] Australian Boot Trade Employees’ Federation v Whybrow & Co (1910) 11 CLR 311 at 341. [21] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) CLR 355 [22] Miller v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 668 at 674, Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30 31.So to be in a position to resolve the issue for deter…
-
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority
[1998] HCA 28
Citation 4
…tralian Boot Trade Employees’ Federation v Whybrow & Co (1910) 11 CLR 311 at 341. [21] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) CLR 355 [22] Miller v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 668 at 674, Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30 31.So to be in a position to resolve the issue for determination…
-
Mills v Meeking
[1990] HCA 6
Citation 5
…21] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) CLR 355 [22] Miller v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 668 at 674, Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30 31.So to be in a position to resolve the issue for determination, I must assess the purpose or object of the Firearms Act and resolve any ambiguity b…
-
Miller v Commonwealth
[1904] HCA 34
Citation 6
…Whybrow & Co (1910) 11 CLR 311 at 341. [21] Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) CLR 355 [22] Miller v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 668 at 674, Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30 31.So to be in a position to resolve the issue for determination, I must assess the purpose or object of the…
-
R v Sayers
[2006] SADC 123
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…s a firearm under the Act and is the subject of a declaration to that effect by the Registrar published in the Gazette. [17] R v Sayers [2006] SADC 123 per Beazley J [18] Section 5 of that Act relevantly defined “firearm” as: “(a) a device designed to be carried by hand and to fire shots, bullets or other projecti…