Police Regulation 2015 (NSW)
Medicines, Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 2022 No 73 (not commenced)
This Regulation is the Police Regulation 2015.
This Regulation commences on 1 September 2015 and is required to be published on the NSW legislation website.
This Regulation replaces the Police Regulation 2008, which is repealed on 1 September 2015 under section 10 (2) of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989.
In this Regulation—
The Act and the Interpretation Act 1987 contain definitions and other provisions that affect the interpretation and application of this Regulation.
Notes in this Regulation do not form part of this Regulation.
The Commissioner is responsible, for the purposes of the NSW Police Force—
(a) for the division of the State into areas (however described), and
(b) for the establishment of commands, branches, sections, special task forces and other groups of police officers (however described).
Section 10 (6) of the Act provides that the Commissioner may establish, or abolish, or change the name of, any branch or other part of the NSW Police Force.
The grades within the ranks of superintendent, inspector, sergeant and constable are as follows—
• Superintendents (in descending order) • chief superintendent
• superintendent
• Inspectors (in descending order) • chief inspector
• inspector
• Sergeants (in descending order) • senior sergeant
• sergeant
• Constables (in descending order) • senior constable
• constable
A police officer of any rank may, on satisfying requirements specified by the Commissioner, be designated as a detective.
Police officers in charge of a branch or other part of the NSW Police Force (however described) are responsible for the proper performance of duty by police officers and administrative employees under their control.
Police officers who are NSW Police Force senior executives or are of the rank of superintendent or inspector, if in charge of an area referred to in clause 4, are responsible for the peace and good order of the area.
The form of the oath required to be taken by a police officer under section 13 of the Act is as follows—
• I, , do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lord the King, His heirs and successors according to law, as a police officer without favour or affection, malice or ill-will until I am legally discharged, that I will cause His Majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved, and that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against that peace, and that while I continue to be a police officer I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all my duties faithfully according to law. So help me God.
The form of the affirmation is the same as the form of the oath, except that—
(a) the words “solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm” are to be substituted for the word “swear”, and
(b) the words “So help me God” are to be omitted.
Police officers are to comply strictly with the Act and this Regulation and promptly comply with all lawful orders from those in authority over them.
In particular, a police officer is required—
(a) to serve wherever the officer is duly directed, and
(b) to perform such police duty as may be duly directed, whether or not during the officer’s rostered hours of duty.
A police officer who is off-duty (whether rostered off-duty, on annual leave, suspended or otherwise absent)—
(a) is subject to the provisions of this Regulation and the Police Code of Conduct, and
(b) will be held responsible for any misconduct by the officer while off-duty, and
(c) unless on sick leave, may be recalled to duty as if the officer were on duty.
If directed to do so by his or her supervising officer, a police officer who is off-duty must give notice to the supervising officer (or such other police officer or administrative employee as the supervising officer may nominate) if the off-duty officer is to be absent from his or her usual place of residence for more than 24 hours.
The notice must indicate where the police officer intends to be, and how the police officer may be contacted, during that absence.
Before completing his or her probation and at such other times as the Commissioner may direct, a police officer must undergo a health assessment in accordance with the government sector employment rules under the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 in the same way as if the person was a Public Service employee whose engagement in a Public Service agency is subject to a health assessment.
A police officer is entitled to be issued with a certificate of service by the Commissioner on resignation or retirement unless—
(a) the officer is removed from the NSW Police Force as a consequence of a section 181D order, or
(b) the officer is dismissed from the NSW Police Force as a consequence of section 80 dismissal action, or
(c) the officer resigns or retires from the NSW Police Force after having been notified that he or she is—
(i) the subject of consideration for the making of a section 181D order or the taking of section 80 dismissal action, or
(ii) the subject of an investigation under the Act or the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016.
A police officer who is not issued with a certificate of service because of an investigation concerning the officer’s conduct is nevertheless entitled to a certificate if, after the investigation and any proceedings arising from the investigation are completed, there is no evidence of misconduct on the part of the officer.
(Repealed)
In accordance with section 80 (2) of the Act, a person when first appointed as a police officer of the rank of constable is to be appointed on probation—
(a) for a period of 1 year, or
(b) for such longer or shorter period (being not less than 6 months) as the Commissioner may direct in the case of that person.
Despite subclause (1), the Commissioner may direct that the period of probation be less than 6 months, or may waive the period of probation completely, if the person has previously served as a police officer in the NSW Police Force or in any other police service or police force (however called).
All or any part of such previous service may, with the approval of the Commissioner, be counted towards seniority.
Confirmation of appointment in the rank of constable is subject to—
(a) the successful completion of initial basic training, as determined by the Commissioner, and
(b) the completion of the period of probation, and
(c) a satisfactory fitness report, and
(d) the other requirements of this Division.
The appointment of a probationary constable is not to be confirmed unless a police officer designated by the Commissioner has reported that the probationary constable is fit to discharge satisfactorily the duties of constable.
Any such fitness report is to deal with the probationary constable’s—
(a) medical fitness, as indicated by a health assessment referred to in clause 10, and
(b) aptitude for the discharge of the duties of constable, and
(c) competence, integrity, performance and conduct.
If on the day on which the Commissioner would otherwise confirm his or her appointment the probationary constable is medically unfit but satisfies all other requirements, the Commissioner may confirm the appointment on and from the day the probationary constable is certified medically fit by a medical practitioner.
The seniority of a constable whose appointment is confirmed in accordance with subclause (3) is to be determined—
(a) if the constable’s medical unfitness was due to any wound, injury or sickness occasioned in the actual execution of duty, as though the appointment had been confirmed—
(i) on the day on which it would have been confirmed but for the constable’s medical unfitness, or
(ii) if that day occurred more than 12 months before the day on which the appointment was actually confirmed, on the day occurring 12 months before the day on which it was actually confirmed, or
(b) if the constable’s medical unfitness was not due to any wound, injury or sickness occasioned in the actual execution of duty, as though the appointment had been confirmed—
(i) on the day on which it would have been confirmed but for the constable’s medical unfitness, or
(ii) if that day occurred more than 9 months before the day on which the appointment was actually confirmed, on the day occurring 9 months before the day on which it was actually confirmed.
Promotion to the grade of senior constable is subject to—
(a) the successful completion of internal or external qualifications as determined by the Commissioner, and
(b) the completion of 4 years’ service—
(i) from the date on which the constable’s appointment was confirmed, or
(ii) if the constable’s seniority runs from an earlier day, from that earlier day, and
(c) a satisfactory fitness report, and
(d) the other requirements of this Division.
A constable is not to be promoted to the grade of senior constable unless a police officer designated by the Commissioner has reported that the constable is fit to discharge satisfactorily the duties of senior constable.
Any such report is to deal with the constable’s—
(a) aptitude for the discharge of the duties of senior constable, and
(b) competence, integrity, performance and conduct.
Despite anything to the contrary in this Division, the Commissioner—
(a) may confirm the appointment of a probationary constable, or
(b) may promote a constable to the grade of senior constable,
on the basis of exceptional bravery or specially meritorious service.
A police officer whose appointment is confirmed or who is promoted under this clause is not eligible for a further promotion until any prescribed qualifications for the grade up to and including that of the further promotion have been satisfied.
This Division applies to the promotion of non-executive police officers to the rank of sergeant, inspector or superintendent.
In this Division—
(a) an assessment of the officer’s individual capabilities against the capabilities required for the rank,
(b) an assessment of the officer’s technical skills and operational knowledge against the technical skills and operational knowledge required for the rank.
A non-executive police officer (an
(a) the officer has completed the required time at rank for the rank below the promotion rank, and
(b) the Commissioner—
(i) has made inquiries as to the integrity of the officer under section 71(1)(a) of the Act, and
(ii) following the making of those inquiries, is satisfied the officer is suitable to participate in the process.
Before applying for a promotion to a promotion rank in accordance with clause 23, an eligible non-executive police officer must, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, successfully complete the rank-based assessment for the promotion rank.
The officer must have successfully completed the assessment not more than 2 years before the day of making the application.
An eligible non-executive police officer who has successfully completed the rank-based assessment for the promotion rank may apply for a promotion to the relevant rank when a position for the rank is advertised.
An officer who applies for a promotion to the advertised position must undertake the position-based assessment for the position.
A decision about promotion must be based on the outcome of the position-based assessment to determine the officer best suited to the requirements of the position.
The following principles apply in relation to a decision about promotion—
(a) pre-established standards for a position are to be expressed as levels against each capability or other requirements for the position,
(b) an officer may be appointed to a position only if the officer meets the pre-established standards for the position.
A non-executive police officer may apply to the Commissioner for a review of the Commissioner’s determination of the officer’s completion of the rank-based assessment.
The application may only be made on the following grounds—
(a) that the whole or a part of the process relating to the assessment was irregular,
(b) that the outcome of an assessment of the officer’s individual capabilities was unreasonable, having regard to all the circumstances,
(c) that the outcome of an assessment of the officer’s technical skills and operational knowledge was incorrect, having regard to all the circumstances.
The application—
(a) must be in writing and state the grounds on which the application is made, and
(b) may be made no later than 48 hours after the officer is notified of the Commissioner’s determination.
A non-executive police officer may apply to the Commissioner for a review of the outcome of the officer’s position-based assessment.
The application may only be made on the ground that the whole or a part of the process relating to the assessment was irregular, and is not a review of the merits of the outcome.
The application—
(a) must be in writing and state the grounds on which the application is made, and
(b) may be made no later than 48 hours after the officer is notified of the outcome of the assessment.
The permanent appointment of an officer in the position to which the review relates cannot be implemented until the review has been completed.
On receiving an application for a review, the Commissioner must—
(a) assess the grounds supporting the application, and
(b) decide whether the application discloses a ground on which the application may be made.
If the application discloses a ground on which the application may be made, the Commissioner must—
(a) convene a Review Panel for the purposes of determining the application, and
(b) refer the application to the Review Panel for determination.
The decision of the Commissioner under this clause is final and is not subject to any further review.
A Review Panel must consist of the following members—
(a) an employer representative appointed by the Commissioner,
(b) an employee representative appointed by the President of the Police Association of NSW,
(c) an independent person appointed by the Minister as the Chairperson of the Review Panel.
A person who was involved in the determination or outcome the subject of the review may not be a member of the Review Panel considering the determination or outcome.
A review by a Review Panel must not be conducted by way of a hearing that involves persons appearing before the Review Panel.
In conducting the review, the Review Panel may consider any information the Panel considers relevant to the determination or outcome the subject of the review.
In determining an application for a review under clause 24(1), the Review Panel may—
(a) affirm the determination, or
(b) vary the determination, or
(c) set aside and substitute the determination, or
(d) allow the officer to attempt a rank-based assessment again.
In determining an application for a review under clause 25(1), the Review Panel may—
(a) if satisfied the process relating to the assessment was not in any way irregular—affirm the outcome, or
(b) if satisfied the process relating to the assessment was in any way irregular—recommend the outcome be revoked and another assessment process be carried out.
A decision supported by a majority of the members of a Review Panel is the decision of the Panel.
The Review Panel must, within 72 hours of making the decision, notify the Commissioner and the applicant of the decision and the reasons for the decision.
A failure by the Review Panel to give the notice within the period prescribed under subclause (4) does not invalidate the decision.
A decision of the Review Panel under this clause is final and is not subject to any further review.
A non-executive police officer may apply to the Commissioner for a review of the following decisions made on integrity grounds—
(a) that the officer is unsuitable to participate in a process for promotion,
(b) to suspend or remove the officer from any part of a process for promotion.
The application must be—
(a) in writing and state the grounds on which the application is made, and
(b) made no later than 7 days after the officer is notified of the decision.
Within 48 hours of receiving the application, the Commissioner must refer the application to the person appointed by the Minister for the purposes of conducting the review (the
The procedure for conducting the review must be determined by the appointed person.
However, the review must not be conducted by way of a hearing that involves persons appearing before the appointed person.
In conducting the review, the appointed person may consider—
(a) any written information provided by the officer, and
(b) any information provided by the Commissioner on which the decision the subject of the review was based, including information as to the integrity of the officer.
The Commissioner is authorised to provide the information referred to in subclause (3)(b) to the appointed person.
The appointed person may—
(a) require the officer to provide further information in relation to the application, and
(b) obtain expert advice in relation to any matter that is relevant to the review, and
(c) inform themselves in any other manner as the appointed person thinks appropriate.
The Commissioner must, if asked by the appointed person, provide to the person any information relevant to the decision the subject of the review.
In determining the application, the appointed person may—
(a) affirm the decision, or
(b) vary the decision, or
(c) set aside and substitute the decision.
The appointed person must, as soon as practicable after making the decision, notify the Commissioner and the applicant of the decision and the reasons for the decision.
However, for subclause (2), the reasons for the decision must not disclose the existence, nature or content of the following—
(a) an ongoing criminal investigation, without the approval of the Commissioner,
(b) an ongoing investigation under the Act, Part 8A, without the approval of the Commissioner,
(c) an ongoing investigation under the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016, Part 6, without the approval of the LECC Chief Commissioner.
The decision of the appointed person is taken to be the decision of the Commissioner.
The decision of the appointed person under this clause is final and is not subject to any further review.
(Repealed)
The Commissioner must ensure that the following information is kept in relation to each police officer—
(a) information as to any offence in respect of which the officer has been charged before a court, including information as to—
(i) whether the officer was found guilty of the offence, or
(ii) whether the charge was withdrawn, dismissed or otherwise disposed of,
(b) information as to any finding of misconduct or unsatisfactory performance in respect of which a section 173 order has been made, being—
(i) a reviewable section 173 order, or
(ii) a non-reviewable section 173 order made as a consequence of the officer’s substantial or consistent failure to meet reasonable standards of performance or conduct,
including information as to the reasons for the finding,
(c) information as to any offence in respect of which a departmental charge had been preferred against the officer before 8 March 1999, including information as to—
(i) whether the charge was found proven (and, if so, the reasons for the finding), or
(ii) whether the charge was withdrawn, dismissed or otherwise disposed of.
A police officer is entitled on application to be given access to any information kept in relation to the police officer under this clause.
(Repealed)
A police officer must not, in relation to any other police officer—
(a) fail to approve, or fail to recommend, the promotion of that other officer, or
(b) approve or recommend—
(i) the taking of section 80 dismissal action, or
(ii) the making of a section 173 order or section 181D order,
with respect to that other officer, or
(c) direct, approve or recommend the transfer of that other officer to another position in the NSW Police Force or in any other government sector agency, or
(d) make, approve or recommend a decision which detrimentally affects the benefits or awards of that other officer, or
(e) fail to approve or recommend that that other officer receive education or training which could reasonably be expected to improve that other officer’s opportunities for promotion or to confer some other advantage on that other officer, or
(f) change the duties of that other officer so that they are not appropriate to that other officer’s salary or position or approve or recommend such a change, or
(g) otherwise act to the detriment of that other officer,
in retaliation against that other officer because that other officer has made a protected report.
To avoid doubt, subclause (1) does not prevent the taking of reasonable management action in relation to a public official who is a police officer.
In this clause—
See the Act, section 206.
If the Commissioner has reasonable cause to believe that the conduct of a police officer has been such as to justify—
(a) the taking of section 80 dismissal action or the making of a section 181D order with respect to the officer, or
(b) the institution of criminal proceedings against the officer,
the Commissioner may suspend the officer from office (with or without pay) pending further investigation and decision as to the action to be taken.
If it is established to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that an officer under suspension from office without pay is suffering undue hardship, the Commissioner may approve of the officer obtaining other employment for such period as the Commissioner may direct.
If it is established to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the officer or the officer’s family will suffer undue hardship because of the suspension without pay, the Commissioner may approve a maintenance payment of not more than 100% of the salary of the officer at the time of the suspension.
A police officer may not commence criminal proceedings against another police officer unless authorised by the Commissioner.
This clause applies if—
(a) any person (including a police officer) makes an allegation, not being an allegation which constitutes a complaint under Part 8A of the Act, to a police officer (in this clause called
the senior officer ) concerning the conduct of a police officer, and(b) the senior officer has reasonable grounds for believing that, if the allegation were true—
(i) the police officer against whom the allegation was made would have committed a criminal offence, or
(ii) section 80 dismissal action could be taken, or a section 173 order or section 181D order could be made, with respect to that officer.
In the circumstances referred to in subclause (1), the senior officer must not disclose to the officer against whom the allegation was made or any other person the identity of the person who made the allegation, except—
(a) to or with the authority of the Commissioner, or
(b) in connection with the institution of or otherwise for the purposes of any proceedings before a Royal Commission, a Special Commission of Inquiry, the Industrial Relations Commission or a court, or
(c) in the circumstances mentioned in the Act, section 169A(2)(a)–(j).
For the purposes of subclause (2)(c), references in the Act, section 169A(2)(a)–(j) are to be interpreted in the following way—
(a) a reference to “the person”—as a reference to the maker of an allegation to which this clause applies,
(b) a reference to a complaint—as a reference to an allegation to which this clause applies,
(c) a reference to identifying information—as a reference to information disclosing the identity of the maker of an allegation to which this clause applies,
(d) a reference to “the member of the NSW Police Force”—as a reference to a senior officer referred to in subclause (2).
(Repealed)
For the purposes of sections 174 (5) and 181E (3) of the Act, the Commissioner is not under a duty to make available to an applicant in review proceedings any document provided to the Commissioner in connection with the taking of action against the applicant under Part 9 of the Act if the document would be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of client legal privilege (legal professional privilege).
A misconduct matters information system is to be established.
The system is to be operated and maintained by the Commissioner.
The Commissioner must allow the LECC to have access to the system for the purpose of enabling unrestricted access to all information in the system as provided for in section 129 (3) of the Act.
The Commissioner must provide the LECC with such information as that body or person may request with respect to the design of the system and the procedures in accordance with which the system is operated and maintained.
Despite subclauses (3) and (4), the Commissioner is not to allow unauthorised access to information the subject of a caveat under section 129 (4) of the Act.
The following information about misconduct matters is to be registered in the system—
(a) the information required by section 129 of the Act to be registered in the system,
(b) such additional information as is required to be registered in the system by the terms of a protocol or memorandum of understanding referred to in section 128 (2) of the Act,
(c) such other information as the Commissioner may from time to time direct to be registered in the system.
The complaints information system kept prior to 1 September 2008 (including the complaints information system kept under Part 8A of the Act prior to 8 March 1999) is taken to form part of the misconduct matters information system established under this clause.
A remedial performance program referred to in section 173 (3) of the Act must include the following elements—
(a) a police officer is to be placed on the program if his or her performance as a police officer is consistently unsatisfactory, having regard to his or her job responsibilities,
(b) the police officer is firstly to be required to attend local workplace counselling conducted by his or her supervisor (the number of counselling sessions, the period of time over which they are to be conducted and the date on which a review of the police officer’s performance is to be held to be determined by the supervisor following consultation with the police officer),
(c) a statement of the matters determined in accordance with paragraph (b) is to be signed both by the police officer and the supervisor,
(d) the principal purpose of the counselling sessions is to ensure that the police officer is made aware of—
(i) his or her job responsibilities and work performance expectations, and
(ii) the standard to which he or she is expected to perform in fulfilling those responsibilities and expectations,
(e) if after completion of the counselling sessions the police officer’s performance as a police officer is satisfactory, the supervisor must notify the police officer of that fact,
(f) if after completion of the counselling sessions the police officer’s performance as a police officer continues to be unsatisfactory, the supervisor—
(i) must notify the police officer of that fact, and
(ii) must require the police officer to attend formal counselling sessions (the number of counselling sessions, the period of time over which they are to be conducted and the date on which a final review of the police officer’s performance is to be held to be determined by the supervisor),
(g) a statement of the matters determined in accordance with paragraph (f) is to be signed both by the police officer and the supervisor,
(h) the decision to require a police officer to attend formal counselling sessions is to be made only after consultation with, and with the concurrence of, the supervisor’s commander or manager,
(i) the number of counselling sessions, the period of time over which they are to be conducted and the date on which a final review of the police officer’s performance is to be held may be extended or postponed, as occasion requires,
(j) the principal purpose of the formal counselling sessions is to ensure that the police officer is made aware of—
(i) those areas in which he or she is failing to fulfil his or her job responsibilities, and
(ii) the standard to which his or her performance must be improved, and
(iii) the period of time within which he or she must sustain an improved performance in those areas, and
(iv) the fact that his or her performance will be closely monitored during that period,
(k) the police officer’s supervisor must cause a written record to be kept as to the steps that are taken to ensure that the police officer is made aware of the matters referred to in paragraph (j),
(l) if after completion of the formal counselling sessions the police officer’s performance as a police officer is satisfactory, the police officer’s supervisor must notify the police officer of that fact,
(m) if after completion of the formal counselling sessions the police officer’s performance as a police officer continues to be unsatisfactory, the supervisor—
(i) must notify the police officer of that fact, and
(ii) may recommend that a section 173 order be made with respect to the police officer,
(n) the decision to make such a recommendation is to be made only after consultation with, and with the concurrence of, the supervisor’s commander or manager.
In this clause—
Uniform must be worn at all times by police officers when on duty or when proceeding to and from their police stations, unless otherwise authorised by the Commissioner.
The Commissioner may from time to time approve of police officers performing certain types of duty being permitted to wear other clothing.
The pattern and cut of the uniform must not be altered in any way and badges, service numbers and insignia of rank must be worn in such manner as the Commissioner may from time to time direct.
Insignia of rank must be worn on epaulettes.
The details of insignia of rank, uniform, badges and service number are to be as the Commissioner may from time to time direct.
A police officer—
(a) is responsible for all articles of uniform and equipment issued to the officer, and
(b) is responsible for any damage to uniform or equipment through neglect and may be required to meet its replacement cost.
If while on police operational duty a police officer performs an act of conspicuous merit involving exceptional bravery, the Commissioner may grant to the officer the Commissioner’s Valour Award.
If while on duty a special constable performs an act of conspicuous merit involving exceptional bravery, the Commissioner may grant to the constable the Commissioner’s Valour Award.
A recipient is entitled to use the initials “VA” added after his or her name.
If while on police operational duty a police officer who has previously been granted the Valour Award performs a further act of conspicuous merit involving exceptional bravery, the Commissioner may grant to the officer a Silver Bar to the Commissioner’s Valour Award.
If while on duty a special constable who has previously been granted the Valour Award performs a further act of conspicuous merit involving exceptional bravery, the Commissioner may grant to the constable a Silver Bar to the Commissioner’s Valour Award.
A recipient is entitled to use the initials “VA” followed by an asterisk after his or her name.
The Commissioner’s Valour Award comprises an ornamental sterling silver medallion 22 millimetres in diameter depicting the New South Wales Police crest and embellished with blue enamel on its highlighted and shaded features.
The medallion is to be mounted centrally on an ornamental sterling silver cross 38 millimetres in width.
The medallion is to be suspended by a silver ring from a plain silver bar on a mainly blue ribbon 38 millimetres wide.
The medallion is to bear the words “FOR BRAVERY”.
Subsequent Bars to the Commissioner’s Valour Awards are to be represented by a laurelled leaf bar with a central rose design, 38 millimetres long in silver gilt.
A miniature of the medallion is to be depicted in a lapel brooch 12 millimetres wide.
Subsequent Bars to the Commissioner’s Valour Awards are to be represented on the back of the lapel brooch by a metal blue disc of 15 millimetres diameter.
The lapel brooch and disc are to be worn only by recipients in plainclothes.
The Commissioner may grant to a police officer the New South Wales Police Medal. The Medal is to be granted in accordance with the Guidelines for the New South Wales Police Medal approved by the Commissioner from time to time.
The Commissioner may approve the payment of gratuities, or recommend the payment of rewards, for special services by police officers.
This clause applies to a police officer who—
(a) accepts an offer of a disengagement benefit under section 8A of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906, or
(b) is offered a disengagement benefit under that section but elects instead to make provision for the benefit under section 9B of that Act.
A police officer to whom this clause applies is entitled to be paid on the termination of the officer’s services the money value of 39 weeks’ special leave with pay as a gratuity.
However, the following provisions apply if the police officer is entitled to be paid a benefit under clause 71 of the Crown Employees (Police
Officers—2014) Award (
(a) if the amount payable to the police officer under clause 71 of the Award is less than the amount calculated under subclause (2)—the gratuity is to be reduced by the amount payable to the police officer under clause 71 of the Award,
(b) if the amount payable to the police officer under clause 71 of the Award is the same as or greater than the amount calculated under subclause (2)—the police officer is not entitled to be paid a gratuity under this clause.
Any gratuity under this clause is in addition to any other gratuity to which the police officer may be entitled under the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906.
Any gratuity under this clause is payable by the Commissioner and is not payable from the Police Superannuation Fund.
Any amendment to this clause that changes the entitlements of a police officer to a gratuity under this clause applies only to an offer of a disengagement benefit referred to in subclause (1) that is made after the commencement of that amendment.
(Repealed)
The Commissioner may direct the manner in which and the occasions on which—
(a) the functions of suspended, sick or absent police officers (other than police officers who are NSW Police Force senior executives), or
(b) the functions attaching to vacant positions (other than positions held by NSW Police Force senior executives or administrative employees) or vacant specialist positions,
are to be exercised by other members of the NSW Police Force.
Section 33 (5) of the Act provides for the appointment of a member of the NSW Police Force to act as a NSW Police Force senior executive in certain circumstances. The rules under the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 also provide for the temporary assignment of administrative employees to non-executive roles in the NSW Police Force.
An administrative employee who—
(a) acts or relieves in a position currently held by a police officer, or
(b) exercises any supervisory functions in relation to police officers,
is not thereby authorised to exercise (or direct the exercise of) the statutory or common law powers of a police officer.
Administrative employees are responsible for the proper performance of duty by police officers and administrative employees under their control.
A member of the NSW Police Force who has been offered a promotion or appointment in the NSW Police Force may decline the promotion or appointment without prejudice to any rights that the member would, if the promotion or appointment had not been declined, have had to any future promotion or appointment.
A member of the NSW Police Force is to wear a name-plate in such manner, and containing such particulars, as the Commissioner may from time to time direct, unless the member is exempted by the Commissioner from having to wear such a name-plate.
A uniformed police officer who is not required to wear a name-plate must instead wear a numerical identification plate in such manner, and containing such particulars, as the Commissioner may from time to time direct.
A member of the NSW Police Force or a student of policing must treat all information which comes to his or her knowledge in his or her official capacity as strictly confidential, and on no account without proper authority divulge it to anyone.
In particular, a member of the NSW Police Force or a student of policing must observe the strictest secrecy in regard to NSW Police Force business, and is forbidden to communicate without proper authority in any way to any person outside the NSW Police Force any information in regard to police or other official business connected with his or her duties, or which may come to his or her knowledge in the performance of them.
Nothing in this clause operates so as to impede the due performance of operational police duties or to prevent the giving of information if it is reasonable to do so for the purpose of dealing with an emergency when life or property is at risk.
Without limiting subclause (3), nothing in this clause operates to prevent the disclosure of information to a registered medical practitioner or registered psychologist in relation to the provision by that health practitioner of medical or psychiatric care, treatment or counselling (including but not limited to psychological counselling) to a member of the Police Force or a student of policing.
In this Part—
(a) that is designed to indicate the concentration of alcohol present in a person’s breath or blood, and
(b) that is carried out on the person’s breath by means of a device (not being a breath analysing instrument) of a type approved by the Governor for the conduct of breath tests under the Road Transport Act 2013.
Nothing in this Part affects any liability for an offence relating to the consumption or supply of alcohol, or the use or supply of other drugs, arising under the Road Transport Act 2013 or the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 or any other Act.
Nothing in this Part affects any right to conduct breath or other tests for the presence of alcohol or other drugs in a person’s body, under the Road Transport Act 2013, the Marine Safety Act 1998 or any other Act.
Nothing in this Part affects any obligation or right under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977, the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 or any other Act.
Nothing in this Part—
(a) prevents the making of a section 173 order or section 181D order in relation to any other matter associated with the consumption of alcohol or the use of prohibited drugs or steroids by a police officer, or
(b) prevents disciplinary proceedings from being taken under any Act in relation to any other matter associated with the consumption of alcohol or the use of prohibited drugs or steroids by a member of the NSW Police Force who is not a police officer.
A member of the NSW Police Force must not use any prohibited drug.
A member of the NSW Police Force must not use any steroid unless the police officer’s use of the steroid is in accordance with a prescription of a medical practitioner.
A member of the NSW Police Force must not have the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while the member is rostered on duty.
A member of the NSW Police Force must not consume alcohol while the member is on police premises. This applies whether or not the member is rostered on duty.
A police officer must not consume alcohol while the police officer is wearing a police uniform. This applies whether or not the police officer is rostered on duty.
A police officer must not, when required under the Act or this Part to do so, refuse or fail—
(a) to undergo a breath test, or
(b) to submit to a breath analysis, or
(c) to provide a sample of urine or hair,
in accordance with a direction given by an authorised person.
A member of the NSW Police Force must treat all information relating to the results of any test conducted under section 211A or 211AA of the Act or this Part that comes to the member’s knowledge in his or her official capacity as strictly confidential and must not divulge the information to anyone, except for the purposes of Part 9 of the Act or in connection with the assessment, counselling or rehabilitation of the police officer under this Part.
A member of the NSW Police Force must not conspire with, or aid or abet, any police officer to breach this code of behaviour.
A breach of this code of behaviour does not constitute an offence.
The code of behaviour does not apply so as to prevent a member of the NSW Police Force from consuming alcohol—
(a) in the performance of a police task, or
(b) in an official capacity, or
(c) in any other circumstances,
if the member is authorised by the Commissioner to do so.
The code of behaviour does not apply so as to prevent a member of the NSW Police Force from consuming alcohol on police premises if the member has the approval of the commander or manager of those premises to do so.
An authorised officer must not direct a police officer to undergo a breath test, submit to a breath analysis, or provide a sample, if the police officer is unable on medical grounds to do so.
The code of behaviour does not prevent a member of the NSW Police Force from divulging otherwise confidential information with the written authority of the Commander, Human Resources Command or the relevant police officer.
If the result of a test conducted under section 211A of the Act or this Part indicates that the prescribed concentration of alcohol is present in a police officer’s breath or blood while the police officer is rostered on duty (and no breath analysis indicates otherwise), the police officer is to be immediately relieved of duty and is not to carry out any duty for the duration of the officer’s shift.
The Commissioner may decide that a police officer who is relieved from duty because of the operation of this clause is not entitled to be paid (whether in wages or salary, paid sick leave or any other type of payment) for that part of the relevant shift that the officer did not work.
This clause applies if—
(a) the Commissioner considers, as a result of a test conducted under section 211A of the Act or this Part, that a police officer has breached the code of behaviour by having the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while rostered on duty, and
(b) the police officer has not breached the code of behaviour in that manner in the 3 years immediately preceding the breach.
In such a case, the Commissioner may ask the police officer to choose whether to undergo counselling and rehabilitation or whether to face the possibility that a section 173 order may be made with respect to the officer.
If the police officer chooses to undergo counselling and rehabilitation, the Commissioner must direct the police officer—
(a) to attend any interview organised with the officer’s commander or manager, and
(b) to attend an interview with a NSW Police Force drug and alcohol counsellor for assessment, and
(c) to participate in any rehabilitation program recommended by that counsellor.
If a police officer—
(a) chooses not to undergo counselling or rehabilitation, or
(b) without reasonable excuse, fails to attend an interview or counselling session after choosing to do so, or
(c) without reasonable excuse, fails to participate in a rehabilitation program after choosing to do so,
the police officer’s commander or manager may recommend the making of a section 173 order with respect to the officer.
The Commissioner is not required to ask the police officer to choose whether to undergo counselling if the Commissioner, having regard to all the circumstances, considers that it would be more appropriate to make a section 173 order or section 181D order with respect to the officer.
This clause applies if—
(a) the Commissioner considers, as a result of a test conducted under section 211A of the Act or this Part, that a police officer has breached the code of behaviour by having the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while rostered on duty, and
(b) the police officer has breached the code of behaviour in that manner in the 3 years immediately preceding the breach.
In such a case, the Commissioner may make a section 173 order or section 181D order with respect to the officer.
The Commissioner may refer the police officer to a medical practitioner for the purpose of that officer determining the police officer’s fitness to remain a police officer.
The Commissioner is to have regard to any report made by the medical practitioner in relation to such a police officer.
If an initial screening test returns a result indicating the possible presence of prohibited drugs in a sample of a police officer’s urine, the Commissioner may—
(a) take no action until the outcome of an analysis of the urine in accordance with clause 96 is known, or
(b) place the officer on modified duties, such as station or office duties, or
(c) relieve the officer from duty on full pay.
This clause applies if—
(a) the Commissioner considers, as a result of a test (other than an initial screening test) conducted under section 211A or 211AA of the Act or this Part, that a police officer has breached the code of behaviour by using a prohibited drug or steroid, and
(b) the police officer has not breached the code of behaviour in that manner in the 5 years preceding the breach.
In such a case, the Commissioner may ask the police officer to choose whether to undergo counselling and rehabilitation or whether to face the possibility that a section 173 order may be made with respect to the officer.
If the police officer chooses to undergo counselling and rehabilitation, the Commissioner must direct the police officer—
(a) to attend any interview organised with the officer’s commander or manager, and
(b) to attend an interview with a NSW Police Force drug and alcohol counsellor for assessment, and
(c) to participate in any rehabilitation program recommended by that counsellor.
If a police officer—
(a) chooses not to undergo counselling or rehabilitation, or
(b) without reasonable excuse, fails to attend an interview or counselling session after choosing to do so, or
(c) without reasonable excuse, fails to participate in a rehabilitation program after choosing to do so,
the Commissioner may make a section 173 order with respect to the officer.
The Commissioner is not required to ask the police officer to choose whether to undergo counselling if the Commissioner, having regard to all the circumstances, considers that it would be more appropriate to make a section 173 order or section 181D order with respect to the officer.
This clause applies if—
(a) the Commissioner considers, as a result of a test (not including a screening test) conducted under section 211A or 211AA of the Act or this Part, that a police officer has breached the code of behaviour by using a prohibited drug or steroid, and
(b) the police officer has breached the code of behaviour in that manner in the 5 years preceding the breach.
In such a case, the Commissioner may make a section 173 order or a section 181D order in relation to the breach of the code of behaviour by any such police officer.
This clause applies to an officer who has been appointed on probation.
If the Commissioner considers, as a result of a test (other than an initial screening test) conducted under section 211A or 211AA of the Act or this Part, that such an officer has breached the code of behaviour by having the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while rostered on duty or by using a prohibited drug or steroid, the Commissioner must either—
(a) direct the officer to attend an interview with a NSW Police Force drug and alcohol counsellor for assessment and to participate in any rehabilitation program recommended by that counsellor, or
(b) direct that the officer’s appointment be terminated.
If such an officer fails, without reasonable excuse, to attend an interview or counselling session after being directed to do so, the Commissioner must direct that the officer’s appointment be terminated.
The Commissioner may at any time refer the officer to a medical practitioner for the purpose of that officer determining the officer’s fitness for duty.
The Commissioner is to have regard to any report made by the medical practitioner in relation to such an officer.
This clause applies to a police officer who breaches the code of behaviour—
(a) by consuming alcohol while wearing a police uniform (while not rostered on duty), or
(b) by consuming alcohol while on police premises (while not rostered on duty), or
(c) by refusing or failing to undertake a breath test when required to do so under this Part, or
(d) by refusing to submit to a breath analysis or to provide a sample of urine or hair when required to do so under this Part,
and who is not exempt from complying with the code of behaviour by reason of clause 80.
In such a case, the Commissioner may make a section 173 order or section 181D order in relation to the breach of the code of behaviour by any such police officer.
The Commissioner may direct an authorised person to conduct special follow-up testing of police officers whom the Commissioner has previously considered to be in breach of the code of behaviour.
Special testing must occur at least once a year. The police officer is not to be given notice of the time of testing.
Special testing may involve any one or more of the following in accordance with this Part—
(a) breath testing,
(b) breath analysis,
(c) a requirement to supply a sample of hair,
(d) a requirement to supply a sample of urine.
Any such special testing is to continue—
(a) for 3 years from the most recent breach, in relation to a police officer who breached the code of behaviour by having more than the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood, or
(b) for 5 years from the most recent breach, in relation to a police officer who breached the code of behaviour by using a prohibited drug or steroid.
The Commissioner may at any time change or revoke any direction given under this clause.
A police officer is not liable to be punished under this Part in relation to the same incident for both—
(a) having the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while rostered on duty, or using a prohibited drug or steroid, or consuming alcohol while wearing a police uniform or while on police premises, and
(b) refusing or failing to undertake a breath test, to submit to a breath analysis or to provide a sample of urine or hair in accordance with this Part.
A police officer is not liable to be punished under this Part in relation to the same incident for both—
(a) having the prescribed concentration of alcohol in his or her breath or blood while rostered on duty, and
(b) consuming alcohol while wearing a police uniform or while on police premises.
The Commissioner may, by instrument in writing, appoint any person to be an authorised person for the purposes of section 211A or 211AA of the Act and this Part. For those purposes, the Commissioner may appoint a police officer or any other person.
The Commissioner may appoint as an authorised person—
(a) a person by name, or
(b) the holder from time to time of a particular office by reference to the title of the office concerned.
The Commissioner must furnish authorised persons with certificates of their appointment as authorised persons.
An authorised person must, if requested to do so, produce the certificate of appointment to any police officer required by the authorised person to submit to a breath test or to do any other thing under section 211A or 211AA or this Part.
This clause applies if—
(a) it appears to an authorised person as a result of a breath test conducted under section 211A of the Act that the prescribed concentration of alcohol may be present in a police officer’s breath or blood, or
(b) a police officer who is required by an authorised person to undergo a breath test under this Part refuses or fails to do so in accordance with the direction of the authorised person.
In such a case, the authorised person may require the police officer to submit to a breath analysis in accordance with the directions of the person.
A breath analysis may be carried out only by an authorised person.
As soon as practicable after a police officer has submitted to a breath analysis the person who carried out the analysis must deliver to the police officer a statement in writing signed by the person specifying—
(a) the concentration of alcohol determined by the analysis to be present in the police officer’s breath or blood and expressed in grams of alcohol in 210 litres of breath or 100 millilitres of blood, and
(b) the day on which and time of the day at which the breath analysis was completed.
A police officer who is required to submit to a breath analysis may request the person making the requisition to arrange for the taking (in the presence of an authorised person) of a sample of the police officer’s blood for analysis, at the police officer’s own expense, by—
(a) a medical practitioner nominated by the police officer, or
(b) a medical practitioner nominated by the person at the police officer’s request.
The making of any such request or the taking of a sample of a police officer’s blood does not absolve the police officer from the obligation imposed on the police officer to submit to a breath analysis in accordance with this clause.
If a police officer makes such a request, the authorised officer must take all reasonable steps to contact the relevant medical practitioner.
The object of this Division is to set out the procedure to be followed in relation to—
(a) a sample of urine or hair provided by a police officer under section 211A or 211AA of the Act (which empowers an authorised person to require a police officer to provide a sample of the officer’s urine or hair for the purpose of testing for the presence of prohibited drugs or steroids), or
(b) a sample of blood provided by a police officer under clause 92 (which allows a police officer to request that a sample of blood be taken) or under section 211A (4B) of the Act (under which a police officer may be required to provide a sample of blood).
This clause applies if a sample of urine is taken under section 211A of the Act for the purpose of testing for the presence of prohibited drugs.
The sample may be subjected to a preliminary test conducted—
(a) on the site at which it is originally provided, and
(b) in accordance with the on-site screening procedure set out in AS 4308 or any other procedure approved by the Commissioner in that regard.
If the preliminary test of the sample returns a result indicating the possible presence of prohibited drugs, it must be dealt with in accordance with clause 95 (3), (4), (5) and (6).
If the preliminary test of the sample returns a result indicating the absence of prohibited drugs, it must be disposed of in accordance with AS 4308.
This clause applies to—
(a) an authorised person who arranges for a sample of urine, hair or blood to be taken when empowered to do so under section 211A or 211AA of the Act, and
(b) a medical practitioner who takes a sample of blood when empowered to do so under clause 92 or directed to do so by an authorised person under section 211A (4B) of the Act.
This clause does not apply in relation to a sample of urine that has been the subject of an initial screening test that returned a result indicating the absence of prohibited drugs.
A person to whom this clause applies must ask the police officer from whom the sample was taken whether or not the police officer would like to keep part of the sample of urine, hair or blood taken from the officer.
A person to whom this clause applies must—
(a) divide the sample into 2 approximately equal portions, or, if the police officer has indicated that he or she would like to keep a part of the sample, divide the same into 3 approximately equal portions, and
(b) place each portion into a container, and
(c) fasten and seal each container, and
(d) mark or label each container for future identification.
Of the sealed containers—
(a) the first container must—
(i) in the case of a sample taken by a medical practitioner under clause 92, be handed by a medical practitioner to the authorised person present when the sample was taken, or
(ii) in any other case, be dealt with in accordance with clause 96, and
(b) the second container must be transported to a laboratory accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia for the purposes of AS 4308 and nominated by the Commissioner, and must be stored at that laboratory on behalf of the Commissioner, and
(c) in the case where the police officer has indicated that he or she would like to keep a part of the sample, the third container must be given to the police officer.
In the case of samples of urine, the two sealed containers referred to in subclause (5) (a) and (b) must be handled in accordance with the procedure set out in AS 4308 or any other procedure approved by the Commissioner in that regard.
An authorised person may arrange for a portion of a sample of a police officer’s urine, hair or blood taken in accordance with section 211A or 211AA of the Act or this Part to be submitted for analysis to an analyst to determine the concentration of alcohol in the blood or to determine whether the urine or hair contains a prohibited drug or steroid.
An analyst to whom a portion of a sample of urine, hair or blood is submitted for analysis under this clause may carry out an analysis of the portion to determine the concentration of alcohol in the blood or to determine whether the urine or hair contains alcohol or a prohibited drug or drugs or a steroid or steroids, as the case requires.
Such analysis must be carried out, and a report on that analysis provided, in accordance with the procedure set out in AS 4308 or any other procedure approved by the Commissioner in that regard.
Analysis must be carried out in a laboratory accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia for the purposes of AS 4308 and nominated by the Commissioner.
If the first analysis of a portion of the sample indicates the presence of alcohol or a prohibited drug or steroid in the sample, an analysis of another portion of the sample must be undertaken.
A person who does anything to introduce, or alter the concentration of, alcohol or any prohibited drug or steroid in the police officer’s urine, hair, breath or blood—
(a) before submitting to a breath analysis, or
(b) before providing a test sample,
is guilty of an offence if the person does so for the purpose of preventing or restricting the use of the results of the analysis in any proceedings against the police officer.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.
A police officer is guilty of an offence if the police officer—
(a) in purported compliance with a requirement to provide a test sample under the Act, provides a false test sample, or
(b) replaces a test sample provided by the police officer with a false test sample, or
(c) encourages another person to provide a test sample, or to do anything else, for the purpose of assisting the police officer to contravene paragraph (a) or (b).
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.
A person who removes or interferes with a test sample provided by a police officer for the purpose of preventing or perverting the course of any proceedings against a police officer is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.
A person who assists or encourages a person to contravene subclause (1), (2) (a) or (b) or (3) with the intention of assisting or encouraging that contravention is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.
In this clause—
(a) a test sample obtained from another person (not being the police officer required to provide the test sample), or
(b) a test sample that has been interfered with, or
(c) a thing that is not a test sample.
This Part is subject to—
(a) any award or enterprise agreement under the Industrial Relations Act 1996, and
(b) any agreement under section 87 of the Act (including any agreement under section 86 of the Act, as in force before 1 December 2006, or any award, industrial agreement or determination applicable under clause 8 of Schedule 4 to the Act).
For the purpose of calculating the entitlement of a member of the NSW Police Force to leave under this Part, any period served by the member before the commencement of this Part as a member of the Police Force or as a Public Service employee is to be taken into account as service as a member of the NSW Police Force.
Current awards such as the Crown Employees (Police Officers—2014) Award and the Crown Employees (NSW Police Force Administrative Officers and Temporary Employees) Award 2009 generally provide for leave entitlements for members of the NSW Police Force to whom this Part applies.
An application by a member of the NSW Police Force for leave under this Part is to be made to and dealt with by the Commissioner.
The Commissioner, in dealing with any such application, must have regard to the exigencies of the NSW Police Force, but as far as practicable is to deal with the application in accordance with the wishes of the member.
Unless the contrary intention appears, a period of leave to which an administrative employee is entitled under this Part is, where the employee is employed in the NSW Police Force for 6 or 7 working days each week, to be increased to six-fifths or seven-fifths, respectively, of the period of leave to which the employee would, but for this clause, be entitled under this Part.
Subject to this Division, a member of the NSW Police Force is entitled—
(a) after service for 10 years, to leave for 2 months on full pay or 4 months on half pay, and
(b) after service for more than 10 years, to—
(i) leave as provided by paragraph (a), and
(ii) in addition, an amount of leave proportionate to the member’s length of service after 10 years, calculated on the basis of 5 months on full pay, or 10 months on half pay, for 10 years served after service for 10 years.
For the purpose of calculating the entitlement of a person to extended leave under this clause at any time—
(a) service referred to in this clause includes service before the commencement of this Part (as referred to in clause 98 (2)), and
(b) there must be deducted from the amount of extended leave to which, but for this paragraph, that person would be entitled—
(i) any extended leave, or leave in the nature of extended leave, and
(ii) the equivalent, in extended leave, of any benefit instead of extended leave or leave in the nature of extended leave,
taken or received by that person before that time, including any such leave taken, or benefit received, by that person in accordance with any former Act, and
(c) the provisions of Schedule 2 to the Government Sector Employment Regulation 2014 have effect.
Nothing in subclause (2) is to be regarded as authorising, in respect of the same period of leave taken or the same benefit received, a deduction under both subclause (2) (b) and clause 7 of Schedule 2 to the Government Sector Employment Regulation 2014.
If the services of a member of the NSW Police Force with at least 5 years’ service as an adult and less than 10 years’ service are terminated (otherwise than by the making of a section 181D order)—
(a) by the Crown, the Governor or the Commissioner for any reason other than the member’s serious and intentional misconduct, or
(b) by the member on account of illness, incapacity or domestic or other pressing necessity,
the member is entitled—
(c) for 5 years’ service, to 1 month’s leave on full pay, and
(d) for service after 5 years, to a proportionate amount of leave on full pay calculated on the basis of 3 months’ leave for 15 years’ service (that service to include service as an adult and otherwise than as an adult).
For the purposes of subclause (4),
(a) in the case of a police officer—the rate for a constable, or
(b) in any other case—the lowest rate fixed under the award or agreement, for an adult male or adult female in the same trade, classification, calling, group or grade as the member.
For the purposes of subclause (1),
(a) service under the Teaching Service Act 1980, and
(b) any period of leave without pay taken before the commencement of the Public Service and Other Statutory Bodies (Extended Leave) Amendment Act 1963, and
(c) in the case of a member of the NSW Police Force who has completed at least 10 years’ service—any period of leave without pay, not exceeding 6 months, taken after that commencement.
In subclause (6) (c), for the purpose of determining whether or not a member of the NSW Police Force has completed at least 10 years’ service, the member’s period of service is to be taken—
(a) to include any period of leave without pay taken before the commencement of the Public Service and Other Statutory Bodies (Extended Leave) Amendment Act 1963, and
(b) to exclude any period of leave without pay taken after that commencement.
For the purposes of subclause (4),
A member of the NSW Police Force who has acquired a right to extended leave with pay is entitled, immediately on the termination of the member’s services, to be paid instead of that leave the money value of the extended leave as a gratuity in addition to any gratuity to which the member may be otherwise entitled.
If a member of the NSW Police Force has acquired a right to extended leave with pay and dies before starting it, or after starting it dies before completing it—
(a) the member’s surviving spouse, or
(b) if there is no such surviving spouse, the member’s children, or
(c) if there is no such surviving spouse or child, a person who, in the opinion of the Commissioner, was, at the time of the member’s death, a dependant relative of the member,
is or are entitled to receive the money value of the leave not taken, or not completed, calculated at the rate of salary that the member received at the time of his or her death, less any amount paid to the member in respect of the leave not taken, or not completed.
If a member of the NSW Police Force with at least 5 years’ service as an adult and less than 10 years’ service dies—
(a) the member’s surviving spouse, or
(b) if there is no such surviving spouse, the member’s children, or
(c) if there is no such surviving spouse or child, a person who, in the opinion of the Commissioner, was, at the time of the death of the member, a dependant relative of the member,
is or are entitled to receive the money value of the leave which would have accrued to the member had his or her services terminated, calculated at the rate of salary that the member was receiving at the time of his or her death.
If there is a guardian of any children entitled under subclause (1) or (2), the payment to which those children are entitled may be made to that guardian for their maintenance, education and advancement.
If there is no person entitled under subclause (1) or (2) to receive the money value of any leave not taken or not completed by a member of the NSW Police Force or which would have accrued to a member of the NSW Police Force, payment in respect of that leave must be made to the member’s personal representatives.
Any payment under this clause is in addition to any payment due under any Act under which superannuation benefits are paid.
If payment of the money value of leave has been made under this clause, the Crown and the Commissioner cease to be liable for payment of any amount in respect of that leave.
In this clause,
“De facto partner” is defined in section 21C of the Interpretation Act 1987.
This Division applies to all police officers, other than those who are NSW Police Force senior executives.
Annual leave on full pay accrues to a non-commissioned police officer at the rate of 30 working days per year.
(c) a payment relating to or arising from the loss of a part, or the use of a part, of the incapacitated police officer’s body to the extent the compensation is not compensation for—
(i) loss of income, or
(ii) loss of earning capacity,
(d) non-renewal benefit payments,
(e) welfare, social security or other support payments, benefits or allowances from the Australian Government,
(f) payments for pain and suffering under the Workers Compensation Act 1987, section 67 before its repeal.
A payment may be income for this clause whether it is—
(a) a lump sum, a periodic payment or a combination of a lump sum and a periodic payment, or
(b) in the nature of a capital payment or an income payment.
In this clause—
If a payment is or will be made under this part by the Commissioner to an incapacitated police officer and a payment of compensation, damages or another payment or remedy in a claim made by the police officer in relation to or arising from an injury has been or will be made to the police officer, the amount of the payment made, or to be made, under this part must be—
(a) deducted from the payment of compensation, damages or another payment or remedy in a claim made by the police officer against the Crown, or
(b) otherwise repaid to the Commissioner.
In this clause—
(a) means—
(i) the Crown within the meaning of the Crown Proceedings Act 1988, or
(ii) the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of each of the other States or of the Territories, and
(b) includes—
(i) an officer, employee or agent of the Crown, and
(ii) an officer, employee or agent of the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of any of the other States or of the Territories, and
(iii) a statutory corporation or other body representing the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, of any of the other States or of the Territories.
A relevant person must give the Commissioner relevant information requested by the Commissioner in relation to an incapacitated police officer that is within the relevant person’s possession or control.
The Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, section 243(1)(f) provides that information obtained in connection with or administration of that Act may be disclosed with lawful excuse.
The Commissioner may give information about an incapacitated police officer to a relevant person for the administration or operation of the scheme and any associated workers compensation claims.
In this clause—
(a) the incapacitated police officer,
(b) if the incapacitated police officer has a guardian under the Guardianship Act 1987—the incapacitated police officer’s guardian,
(c) if the incapacitated police officer has appointed another person to represent the police officer—the person appointed by the incapacitated police officer,
(d) ICNSW or an agent of ICNSW,
(e) the NSW Self Insurance Corporation or an agent of the NSW Self Insurance Corporation,
(f) another entity that holds any of the following information—
(i) relevant information,
(ii) health information,
(iii) other information relevant to the scheme or an approved death and disability insurance policy in force under the Act, section 199C as in force before 27 September 2024.
For the Act, section 199C(3), definition of
A police officer who is a contributor to the State Authorities Superannuation Fund and covered by the additional benefit under the State Authorities Superannuation Act 1987 is covered for on-duty and off-duty injuries, but not death or catastrophic or exceptional extension payments, under the scheme.
In this clause—
(a) base salary, and
(b) if loadings are paid to a police officer—the loadings.
For the Act, section 199C(3), definition of
A police officer who is not a contributor to the State Authorities Superannuation Fund and covered by the additional benefit under the State Authorities Superannuation Act 1987 is covered for death, on-duty injuries and off-duty in juries under the scheme.
In this clause—
(a) base salary, and
(b) if loadings are paid to a police officer—the loadings.
A committee is established to conduct an annual review of, and provide a report to the Minister and the Treasurer about, the following matters—
(a) the cost to the State of the scheme,
(b) the number of claims made under the scheme,
(c) fairness to police officers of the scheme.
The committee consists of the following members—
(a) a representative of the Commissioner nominated by the Commissioner,
(b) a representative of the Police Association of NSW nominated by the Association,
(c) a representative of ICNSW nominated by the chief executive of ICNSW.
If a report under subclause (1) advises that the cost of the scheme in a year exceeds the amount budgeted for the scheme, the Minister and the Treasurer must review the operation of this part in consultation with the following—
(a) the Commissioner,
(b) the Police Association of NSW.
(c) (Repealed)
The Minister and the Treasurer may consult with any insurers providing cover under the scheme.
The Commissioner must ensure the Police Association of NSW has access to the information necessary for the committee to conduct a review under this clause.
The Treasurer may, at any time following consultation with the Auditor-General, ask the Auditor-General to conduct a performance audit of the scheme under the Government Sector Audit Act 1983, section 38EA.
For the purposes of section 199G of the Act, an approved death and disability insurance policy must provide for payments for total and permanent disability for police officers that are not less than the payments determined in accordance with the following scale—
Age at last birthday before total and permanent disablement | Lump sum as multiple of officer’s salary on total and permanent disablement |
18 | 3.25 |
19 | 3.25 |
20 | 3.25 |
21 | 3.25 |
22 | 3.25 |
23 | 3.25 |
24 | 3.25 |
25 | 3.25 |
26 | 3.25 |
27 | 3.25 |
28 | 3.25 |
29 | 3.25 |
30 | 3.25 |
31 | 3.25 |
32 | 3.25 |
33 | 3.25 |
34 | 3.25 |
35 | 3.25 |
36 | 3.25 |
37 | 3.25 |
38 | 3.25 |
39 | 3.25 |
40 | 3.25 |
41 | 3.25 |
42 | 3.25 |
43 | 3.25 |
44 | 3.25 |
45 | 2.95 |
46 | 2.70 |
47 | 2.44 |
48 | 2.17 |
49 | 1.90 |
50 | 1.63 |
51 | 1.34 |
52 | 1.19 |
53 | 1.04 |
54 | 0.95 |
55 | 0.91 |
56 | 0.78 |
57 | 0.76 |
58 | 0.64 |
59 | 0.62 |
60 | 0.50 |
61 | 0.43 |
62 | 0.38 |
63 | 0.38 |
64 | 0.36 |
The provisions of the Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 (rescinded by the Police Amendment (Death and Disability) Act 2011) relating to payments for partial and permanent disability continue to apply, despite the rescission of that Award, in respect of the disability of a police officer in any of the following cases if the police officer has not been discharged from the NSW Police Force before the commencement of Part 9B of the Act—
(a) The police officer had been unfit for duty because of the disability for a total period of at least 4 months during the previous 8 months before 30 November 2011 and the NSW Police Force had, on or before that date, received a report or certificate from the police officer’s nominated treating medical practitioner indicating that—
(i) the police officer had reached maximum medical improvement, and
(ii) the police officer should be discharged from the NSW Police Force.
(b) The NSW Police Force had, on or before 25 November 2011, arranged an independent medical examination of the police officer to determine whether the police officer was permanently incapacitated for work as a police officer as a result of the disability.
(c) The NSW Police Force had, on or before 30 November 2011, received a report of an independent medical examination of the police officer and the report indicated that the police officer was permanently incapacitated for work as a police officer as a result of the disability.
Subclause (1) applies instead of the provisions of section 199K (3) of the Act, and those provisions cease to have effect.
Subclause (1) ceases to have effect on 9 December 2012. This subclause does not apply to a police officer who has been discharged from the NSW Police Force before that date because of a disability.
In this clause,
Police officers who are contributors to the State Authorities Superannuation Fund and who are covered by the additional benefit under the State Authorities Superannuation Act 1987 are required to contribute to the cost to the State of an approved death and disability insurance policy within the meaning of Part 9B of the Act.
The required contribution is—
(a) to be the same as the contribution that police officers covered by the additional benefit would have been required to make under the Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 if that Award had not been rescinded by the Police Amendment (Death and Disability) Act 2011, and
(b) to be made by way of salary sacrifice.
On the rescission of the Award, the contribution required to be made by police officers was 0.88% of their remuneration.
The contribution required by section 199F of the Act or subclause (1) is also required to be made from the commencement of Part 9B of the Act and until there is an approved death and disability insurance policy in force under that Part.
In this clause,
The payments to which a police officer who is not a SASS additional benefit contributor is entitled under clause 137 or under section 199K (5), (6) and (7) of the Act are also payable to a police officer who is a SASS additional benefit contributor.
If the amount payable as the additional benefit under the State Authorities Superannuation Act 1987 to or in respect of a police officer who dies or is totally and permanently disabled is less than the amount that would have been payable if the police officer was not a SASS additional benefit contributor, the NSW Police Force is required to supplement the additional benefit by the amount of the difference.
Subclause (3) ceases to have effect if the police officer concerned is given the right to elect to cease being covered by the additional benefit (and to be fully covered by Part 9B of the Act) and the police officer does not make that election by the due date.
The provisions of this Part are subject to any State industrial instrument.
Without limiting any other provision of this Part, the travelling and subsistence allowances and other allowances for members of the NSW Police Force (other than NSW Police Force senior executives) are those provided in State industrial instruments, determinations under section 86 of the Act or agreements under section 87 of the Act.
Subject to section 39 (4) of the Act and this clause, a NSW Police Force senior executive is entitled to be paid—
(a) such travelling and subsistence allowances, and
(b) such allowances in relation to reasonable relocation expenses (whether at the time of being selected for the executive role or during the term of the executive’s employment), and
(c) such other allowances in relation to expenses incurred in the discharge of the executive’s duties,
as the Commissioner may from time to time determine in respect of the executive.
The payment of an allowance determined by the Commissioner in respect of a NSW Police Force senior executive is subject to any determination by the Public Service Commissioner as to the circumstances in which an allowance of that kind may be paid and the amount of the allowance.
A non-executive administrative employee who is, under the rules made under the Government Sector Employment Act 2013, temporarily assigned by the Commissioner to another non-executive role in the NSW Police Force is entitled to be paid an allowance under this clause if the other role is at a higher classification of work than the employee’s current classification of work.
Subject to this clause, the amount of the allowance to be paid to the non-executive administrative employee who is temporarily assigned to another role is the difference between the salary of the employee’s usual role and the point in the salary range of the other role that the Commissioner determines is appropriate having regard to the capabilities, knowledge and experience of the employee.
The amount of the allowance to be paid is proportionate to the duties to be performed by the employee in the other role and is to be determined by the Commissioner before the employee starts the temporary assignment.
An allowance under this clause is not to be paid—
(a) for a temporary assignment to another role that is for a single period of less than 5 ordinary working days (except where the Commissioner otherwise determines), or
(b) in the case where the temporary assignment is for a period of less than 3 months—for any unbroken period of leave of more than 5 ordinary working days taken by the employee during the temporary assignment.
Subclause (4) (a) does not prevent an allowance being paid under this clause to a non-executive administrative employee who works part-time.
If, under section 33 (5) of the Act, the Commissioner appoints a member of the NSW Police Force (whether or not a NSW Police Force senior executive) to act in the role of a NSW Police Force senior executive, the person so appointed is entitled to be paid an allowance under this clause for acting in that role.
Subject to this clause, the amount of the allowance to be paid is the difference between the salary of the person’s usual role and the notional salary of the NSW Police Force senior executive role to which the person is appointed to act.
The amount of the allowance to be paid is proportionate to the duties to be performed by the person in the NSW Police Force senior executive role and is to be determined by the Commissioner before the person starts acting in that role.
An allowance under this clause is not to be paid—
(a) for acting in a NSW Police Force senior executive role for a single period of less than 5 ordinary working days (except where the Commissioner otherwise determines), or
(b) in the case where the appointment to act is for a period of less than 3 months—for any unbroken period of leave of more than 5 ordinary working days taken by the person during the period that the person is appointed to act in a NSW Police Force senior executive role.
Subclause (4) (a) does not prevent an allowance being paid under this clause to a person who works part-time.
In this clause—
If the Commissioner is satisfied that, but for this clause, the actual expenses properly and reasonably incurred by a member of the NSW Police Force in the performance of official duties—
(a) are not adequately covered by an allowance to which the member is entitled under this Regulation, or
(b) are not covered by any allowance payable under this Regulation or under any State industrial instrument,
the member is to be paid an allowance equivalent to the amount of those additional expenses or the amount of those expenses (as the case requires).
An allowance is not payable under this clause unless the member of the NSW Police Force produces official receipts for the expenses incurred by the member.
An allowance under this clause may be reduced if it exceeds without good cause any limit approved in advance by the Commissioner for the expenses concerned.
A member of the NSW Police Force who is seconded to a government sector agency within the meaning of the Government Sector Employment Act 2013 is entitled to be paid an allowance at the same rate as the person would be entitled under clause 140C or 140D had the secondment been a temporary assignment or acting appointment (as the case requires) for which an allowance is payable under those clauses.
If an allowance of a particular kind is payable in relation to the role of a NSW Police Force senior executive or administrative employee and the senior executive or administrative employee is assigned to another role in respect of which the allowance is not payable, the senior executive or employee is no longer entitled to the allowance.
The form of the oath required to be taken by a recognised law enforcement officer under section 207D of the Act is as follows—
• I, , do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lord the King, His heirs and successors according to law, as a recognised law enforcement officer without favour or affection, malice or ill-will until I am legally discharged, that I will cause His Majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved, and that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against that peace, and that while I continue to be a recognised law enforcement officer I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all my duties faithfully according to law. So help me God.
The form of the affirmation is the same as the form of the oath, except that—
(a) the words “solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm” are to be substituted for the word “swear”, and
(b) the words “So help me God” are to be omitted.
An oath may be administered, or an affirmation may be made, in New South Wales or elsewhere.
An oath is to be administered by, and an affirmation is to be made before—
(a) in a case where the recognised law enforcement officer taking the oath or making the affirmation is a police officer in the Police Force of another jurisdiction—
(i) a commissioned police officer in that Police Force who is above the rank of the recognised law enforcement officer, or
(ii) a person who has the authority to administer an oath in that jurisdiction, or
(b) in any other case, a commissioned police officer in the NSW Police Force who is above the rank of the recognised law enforcement officer.
In subclause (4) (a),
(a) in relation to the Commonwealth or the Australian Capital Territory, a person declared to be a commissioned police officer under section 40D of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979 of the Commonwealth, or
(b) in relation to any other State or Territory (except New South Wales), a police officer of or above the rank of Inspector.
A person who was appointed as a special constable under section 101 (1A) (a) of the Police (Special Provisions) Act 1901 and holds that position at the commencement of this clause is exempt from the operation of section 207D of the Police Act 1990 if the person is appointed as a recognised law enforcement officer.
A person who was appointed as a recognised law enforcement officer and ceased to be so appointed is exempt from the operation of section 207D of the Act if the person—
(a) is reappointed as a recognised law enforcement officer, and
(b) had previously taken the oath or made the affirmation in accordance with this clause.
The provisions of Part 15 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 apply to a recognised law enforcement officer in the same way as they apply to a police officer in his or her capacity as a police officer subject to the modifications prescribed by this clause.
Section 202 (1) of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 is modified in its application to recognised law enforcement officers by omitting paragraphs (a) and (b) and by inserting instead the following paragraphs—
(a) evidence that the recognised law enforcement officer is a police officer from another jurisdiction or is a recognised law enforcement officer (unless the officer is wearing his or her uniform as a police officer of another jurisdiction),
(b) the name of the recognised law enforcement officer and his or her place of duty as a police officer in another jurisdiction.
For each age specified in Column 1 of Schedule 1, the capitalisation factors specified in Column 2 of that Schedule (for males) and Column 3 of that Schedule (for females) are prescribed for the purposes of section 216AA of the Act.
The Commissioner is entitled to demand from a person such fees and charges as the Commissioner may from time to time determine with respect to the following services provided to the person, at the person’s request, by a member of the NSW Police Force—
(a) the processing, on behalf of the person, of penalty notices issued by or on behalf of the person,
(b) the provision to the person of training services in connection with the procedures to be followed in relation to the issuing of penalty notices,
(c) the provision to the person of COPS event information in relation to an insurance claim or a motor vehicle accident.
The Commissioner is entitled to demand from an employer fees and charges the Commissioner may from time to time determine for a criminal charge notification service provided by the NSW Police Force to the employer for ongoing checks for criminal proceedings commenced against a person employed by the employer.
The Commissioner is entitled to demand from a person amounts for the provision of supplementary policing services calculated in the manner agreed between the Commissioner and the person if—
(a) the services are provided at the request of the person, and
(b) the services are provided in accordance with conditions agreed between the Commissioner and the person.
In this clause—
(a) as a paid or unpaid employee,
(b) as a self-employed person or as a contractor or subcontractor,
(c) as a volunteer.
For the Act, section 209(4), definition of
The following bodies of persons are declared to be bodies to which section 204A of the Act does not apply—
(a) Justice and Police Museum,
(b) Police Citizens Youth Clubs NSW Ltd,
(c) New South Wales Police Legacy Limited,
(d) Police Bank,
(e) any body that has, among its primary objects, the object of providing public entertainment (other than a body that also has, among its primary objects, the object of promoting or conducting any sporting activity).
(Repealed)
Any act, matter or thing that, immediately before the repeal of the Police Regulation 2008, had effect under that Regulation, is taken to have effect under this Regulation.
Any Region, Region Command, Local Area or Local Area Command in existence under clause 4 immediately before the commencement of the Police Amendment (Command Reorganisation) Regulation
2017 (the
In any document, a reference to an area is to be construed as including a reference to—
(a) if the area is renamed, merged with or substituted by another area or its boundaries are altered—the renamed, merged, substitute or altered area, and
(b) if the area is split into 2 or more other areas—those other areas.
In any document, a reference to a Local Area Commander for a particular Local Area is to be construed as including a reference to—
(a) if the Local Area has been renamed, merged with or substituted by another area or its boundaries have been altered—the police officer in charge of the renamed, merged, substitute or altered area, and
(b) if the Local Area has been split into 2 or more other areas—the police officers in charge of those other areas.
Subclauses (2) and (3) are subject to any express contrary intention in the provision in which the relevant reference occurs.
In this clause—
This clause applies to a non-executive police officer who, immediately before the commencement of the amending Act, was—
(a) on a current promotion list, or
(b) eligible for placement on a proposed promotion list.
The officer is taken to be eligible to apply for a promotion under the Act as follows—
(a) for a position of the rank for which the current promotion list or proposed promotion list was or would have been prepared,
(b) for the period for which the officer was to remain on, or would have remained on, the current promotion list or proposed promotion list, or until the officer has been promoted, whichever is earlier.
In this clause—
This clause applies to a non-executive police officer who, immediately before the commencement of the amending Act, was appointed to a vacant specialist position under subsection (3) of repealed section 66AA.
The appointment to a vacant specialist position under subsection (3) of repealed section 66AA is an appointment on a provisional basis.
The officer is taken to have been appointed to the position on a provisional basis for a period ending 12 months after the commencement of the amending Act (the
The Commissioner must permanently appoint the officer to the position if—
(a) the officer successfully completes the rank-based assessment for the rank to which the vacant specialist position relates within the transitional period, and
(b) the officer holds the specialist qualification, or unique knowledge, skills or experience required for the position, and
(c) if the Commissioner requires the officer to undergo a psychological assessment of the officer’s suitability for the position—the officer undergoes the assessment and satisfies the requirements or criteria relevant to the assessment, and
(d) the officer has, in the opinion of the Commissioner, demonstrated satisfactory performance in the position within the transitional period.
If the officer is not permanently appointed under subclause (3) within the transitional period, at the end of the transitional period—
(a) the provisional appointment ends, and
(b) the officer returns to the rank and grade the officer would have held at the end of the transitional period had the officer not been provisionally appointed to the vacant specialist position under subsection (3) of repealed section 66AA.
In this clause—
Proceedings under the Act pending before the Industrial Relations Commission immediately before the commencement of the Industrial Relations Amendment Act 2023, Schedule 2.28 must be dealt with as if the subschedule had not commenced.
(Clause 143)
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 1 continued | Column 2 continued | Column 3 continued |
Age | Male | Female | Age | Male | Female |
19 | 3.568 | 3.626 | 45 | 2.865 | 2.966 |
20 | 3.552 | 3.610 | 46 | 2.824 | 2.928 |
21 | 3.534 | 3.594 | 47 | 2.782 | 2.888 |
22 | 3.516 | 3.576 | 48 | 2.738 | 2.847 |
23 | 3.498 | 3.559 | 49 | 2.693 | 2.805 |
24 | 3.478 | 3.540 | 50 | 2.647 | 2.762 |
25 | 3.458 | 3.522 | 51 | 2.599 | 2.717 |
26 | 3.438 | 3.502 | 52 | 2.550 | 2.671 |
27 | 3.416 | 3.482 | 53 | 2.500 | 2.624 |
28 | 3.394 | 3.460 | 54 | 2.449 | 2.575 |
29 | 3.371 | 3.439 | 55 | 2.396 | 2.525 |
30 | 3.347 | 3.416 | 56 | 2.342 | 2.473 |
31 | 3.322 | 3.393 | 57 | 2.286 | 2.420 |
32 | 3.296 | 3.368 | 58 | 2.230 | 2.365 |
33 | 3.269 | 3.343 | 59 | 2.172 | 2.309 |
34 | 3.241 | 3.317 | 60 | 2.112 | 2.251 |
35 | 3.213 | 3.290 | 61 | 2.050 | 2.192 |
36 | 3.183 | 3.262 | 62 | 1.987 | 2.131 |
37 | 3.152 | 3.234 | 63 | 1.923 | 2.069 |
38 | 3.120 | 3.204 | 64 | 1.858 | 2.006 |
39 | 3.087 | 3.173 | 65 | 1.792 | 1.941 |
40 | 3.053 | 3.141 | 66 | 1.725 | 1.876 |
41 | 3.018 | 3.108 | 67 | 1.657 | 1.811 |
42 | 2.982 | 3.074 | 68 | 1.589 | 1.744 |
43 | 2.944 | 3.039 | 69 | 1.521 | 1.678 |
44 | 2.905 | 3.003 | 70 | 1.453 | 1.611 |
Police Regulation 2015 (478). LW 21.8.2015. Date of commencement, 1.9.2015, cl 2. This Regulation has been amended as follows—
No 61 | Law Enforcement Conduct Commission Act 2016. Assented to 14.11.2016. Date of commencement of Sch 5.2: 1.7.2017, sec 2 (1) and 2017 (256) LW 16.6.2017; date of commencement of Sch 7.5, assent, sec 2 (2). | |
(741) | Police Amendment (Commissioner’s Valour Award) Regulation 2016. LW 7.12.2016. Date of commencement, on publication on LW, cl 2. | |
(596) | Police Amendment (Executives and Administrative Employees) Regulation 2017. LW 27.10.2017. Date of commencement, 31.10.2017, cl 2. | |
(676) | Police Amendment (Command Reorganisation) Regulation 2017. LW 1.12.2017. Date of commencement, 3.12.2017, cl 2. | |
(138) | Police Amendment (Review of Eligibility Program Results) Regulation 2018. LW 13.4.2018. Date of commencement, on publication on LW, cl 2. | |
(218) | Police Amendment (Promotion Lists) Regulation 2018. LW 25.5.2018. Date of commencement, on publication on LW, cl 2. | |
No 25 | Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2018. Assented to 15.6.2018. Date of commencement of Sch 5.31, 14 days after assent, sec 2 (1). | |
No 23 | Police Amendment (Promotions) Act 2020. Assented to 28.9.2020. Date of commencement, 15.10.2020, sec 2 and 2020 (609) LW 14.10.2020. | |
No 14 | Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022. Assented to 13.4.2022. Date of commencement, 1.10.2023, sec 2 and 2023 (11) LW 20.1.2023. | |
(713) | Police Amendment Regulation 2022. LW 25.11.2022. Date of commencement of Sch 1[1]–[10], on publication on LW, sec 2(b); date of commencement of Sch 1[11], 1.1.2023, sec 2(a). | |
(258) | Police Amendment Regulation 2024. LW 28.6.2024. Date of commencement, on publication on LW, sec 2. | |
(510) | Police Amendment (Police Officer Support Scheme) Regulation 2024. LW 30.9.2024. The regulation (statutory rule) specified the day on which the Police Amendment (Police Officer Support Scheme) Act 2024 commences as the date of commencement. Under the Interpretation Act 1987, section 39(2A), the regulation is not invalid merely because the regulation was published on the NSW legislation website after the day on which one or more of its provisions is or are expressed to commence but provides, in that case, for that or those provisions to commence on the day on which it is published on the NSW legislation website, instead of on the earlier day. | |
(413) | Police Amendment Regulation 2025. LW 15.8.2025. Date of commencement, on publication on LW, sec 2. |
Cl 3 | Am 2016 (741), cl 3 (1); 2020 No 23, Sch 2[1]. |
Cl 4 | Subst 2017 (676), Sch 1 [1]. |
Cl 6 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [1] [2]. Subst 2017 (676), Sch 1 [2]. |
Cl 7 | Am 2022 (713), Sch 1[1] [2]. |
Cl 9 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [3]. |
Cl 11 | Am 2016 No 61, Sch 5.2 [1]. |
Cl 12 | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[2]. |
Part 2, Div 3, heading | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 3, Subdiv 1, heading | Ins 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cll 19, 20 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 3, Subdiv 2, heading | Ins 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cll 21–23 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 3, Subdiv 3, heading | Ins 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cll 24–29 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 3, Subdiv 4, heading | Ins 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cl 30 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cl 31 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cl 32 | Subst 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. Am 2022 (713), Sch 1[3] [4]. |
Part 2, Divs 4–6, headings | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 7, heading | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 7, Subdiv 1, heading | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 7, Subdivs 2–4 (cll 33–40) | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 7, Subdiv 5, heading | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cl 41 | Am 2018 (138), cl 3. Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Part 2, Div 7, Subdivs 6, 7 (cll 42–48) | Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[3]. |
Cl 50 | Rep 2016 No 61, Sch 5.2 [2]. |
Cl 51 | Am 2022 No 14, Sch 7.2[1] [2]. |
Cl 54 | Am 2022 No 14, Sch 7.2[3] [4]. |
Cl 56 | Am 2016 No 61, Sch 5.2 [3]–[7]. |
Cl 57 | Am 2020 No 23, Sch 2[4] [5]. |
Cl 61 | Am 2016 (741), cl 3 (2) (3). |
Cl 62 | Am 2016 (741), cl 3 (3) (4). |
Cl 63 | Am 2016 (741), cl 3 (5). |
Part 3 (cll 67–70) | Rep 2017 (596), Sch 1 [4]. |
Cl 71 | Subst 2017 (596), Sch 1 [5]. Am 2020 No 23, Sch 2[6]. |
Cl 72 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [6]. |
Cl 72A | Ins 2017 (596), Sch 1 [7]. |
Cl 73 | Am 2020 No 23, Sch 2[7]. |
Cl 76 | Am 2016 No 61, Sch 7.5. |
Cl 100 | Subst 2017 (596), Sch 1 [8]. Am 2018 No 25, Sch 5.31. |
Part 6, Div 3, heading | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [9]. |
Cl 104 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [10]. |
Cl 105 | Am 2022 (713), Sch 1[5]. |
Part 6, Div 4, heading | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [11]. |
Cl 123 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [6]. |
Cl 129 | Rep 2024 (510), Sch 1[1]. |
Cl 133 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [12]. |
Cl 134 | Am 2017 (596), Sch 1 [6]. |
Part 6A | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 1 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135A | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[1]. |
Cl 135B | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 2 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135C | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135D | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 3 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135E | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135F | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135G | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135H | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135I | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135J | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[2] [3]. |
Cl 135K | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135L | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[4]. |
Cl 135M | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135N | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 4 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 4, Subdiv 1 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135O | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 4, Subdiv 2 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135P | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135Q | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135R | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135S | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135T | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[5]. |
Cl 135U | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135V | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 4, Subdiv 3 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135W | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135X | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[6]. |
Cl 135Y | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135Z | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZA | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[7]. |
Cl 135ZB | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[8]. |
Cl 135ZC | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZD | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[9]. |
Cl 135ZE | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZF | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Part 6A, Div 5 | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZG | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZH | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZI | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZJ | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[10] [11]. |
Cl 135ZK | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZL | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[12]. |
Cl 135ZM | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[13] [14]. |
Cl 135ZN | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. |
Cl 135ZO | Ins 2024 (510), Sch 1[2]. Am 2025 (413), Sch 1[15]–[18]. |
Part 8 | Subst 2017 (596), Sch 1 [13]. |
Cl 140 | Subst 2017 (596), Sch 1 [13]. |
Cll 140A–140G | Ins 2017 (596), Sch 1 [13]. |
Cl 141 | Am 2022 (713), Sch 1[1] [2]. |
Cl 144 | Am 2022 (713), Sch 1[6]–[10]. |
Cl 144A | Ins 2022 (713), Sch 1[11]. |
Cl 145A | Ins 2018 (218), cl 3. Rep 2020 No 23, Sch 2[8]. |
Cl 147 | Ins 2017 (676), Sch 1 [3]. |
Cll 148, 149 | Ins 2020 No 23, Sch 2[9]. |
Cl 150 | Ins 2024 (258), Sch 1. |
0
0
0