[2015] FWCD 5703
DECISION
| Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 | |
| s.159—Alteration of other rules of organisation | |
| Police Federation of Australia | |
| (R2015/180) | |
| MR ENRIGHT | MELBOURNE, 19 AUGUST 2015 |
| Alteration of other rules of organisation. |
[1] On 11 August 2015 the Queensland Police Branch of the Police Federation of
Australia (the Branch) lodged with the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) a notice and
declaration setting out particulars of alterations to the rules of the organisation.
[2] The particulars set out alterations to rules 3, 28, 39, 40, 42, 72, 73 and insert a new
rule 101 into Part CF2 of the Queensland Police Branch Rules.
[3] The alterations clarify the fact that the Branch Assistant Secretary is not an officer
under the rules and clarify the operation of electoral provisions for various offices and
positions within the Branch.
[4] Following discussion between the branch and staff of the Commission, further
information was provided by the Branch on 18 August 2015.
[5] On the information contained in the notice, I am satisfied the alterations have been
made under the rules of the organisation.
[6] I note that the alterations have the effect of truncating current terms of office for the
Branch Vice President, Branch Treasurer and Branch Assistant Treasurer. I have previously
considered the authorities which deal with the truncation of offices. In my view, the following
principles emerge:
| | Provided it complies with the requirements of the Act, the regulations and its rules, an |
1
organisation has the right to mould its internal structures as it sees fit.
| | An elected office may be abolished during the term of an incumbent provided such |
2
abolition is effected in accordance with the rules and is bona fide.
| | Alterations that seek to abolish an office during its term or a branch must not have an |
| oppressive, unreasonable or unjust effect on members or applications for membership |
3
(in the plural).
[2015] FWCD 5703
4
| [7] | I also note the decision Health Services Union, | in which Delegate Nassios stated that |
it has been the practice of this office to seek from officers whose term of office are abolished
mid-term, declaration as to whether they understand the effect of the alterations and whether
they support the alterations. In particular, I refer to Delegate Nassios’ statement that
declarations play a key role in determining whether the truncation of a term is bona fide and
whether or not it may be oppressive, unreasonable or unjust under s.142(1)(c) of the Fair
Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
[8] In this instance, the proposed truncation of offices is due to the terms of offices falling
out of sync with other offices in the Branch. The intent of the alteration is to re-synchronise
the terms of office with others in the Branch. All affected officers are members of the body
that transacted the present alterations. In addition each of the affected office holders have
provided written consent to the truncation of their term of office. Further, in another matter,
5
the Branch argued unsuccessfully that the terms of office had in fact expired.
[9] In the circumstances, I am therefore satisfied that the truncation of the terms of the
office of Branch Vice President, Branch Treasurer and Branch Assistant Treasurer has been
effected in accordance with the rules of the organisation, is bona fide and does not have an
oppressive, unreasonable or unjust effect on members or applicants for membership within the
meaning of s.142(1)(c).
[10] In my opinion, the alterations comply with and are not contrary to the Fair Work
(Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards and enterprise
agreements, and are not otherwise contrary to law. I certify accordingly under subsection
159(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.
DELEGATE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR570956>
1
Imlach v Daley [1985] FCA 13; (1983) 7 FCR 457.
2
Majority in Saint v Australian Postal and Telecommunications Union and Others (1976) 30 FLR 393.
3
Roughan v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (1992) 36 FCR 536.
4
[2010] FWAD 3897
5
[2015] FWCD 3304
- AGLC
- Police Federation of Australia - Queensland Police Branch [2015] FWCD 5703
- Case
- [2015] FWCD 5703
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the alterations to the organisation's rules complied with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 and related regulations, and whether the truncation of the terms of office for certain positions was legitimate and did not adversely affect members or applicants for membership. The court had to consider whether the changes were bona fide, made in accordance with the organisation's rules, and whether they had an oppressive, unreasonable, or unjust effect on the members or applicants.
The court found that the alterations to the rules of the organisation were made in accordance with the organisation's own rules and were bona fide. The truncation of the terms of office for the Branch Vice President, Branch Treasurer, and Branch Assistant Treasurer was intended to re-synchronise the terms of office with others in the branch, and all affected officers had provided written consent to the changes. The court concluded that the alterations did not have an oppressive, unreasonable, or unjust effect on members or applicants for membership. As the alterations complied with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, the Fair Work Act 2009, modern awards, and enterprise agreements, the court certified the alterations as lawful.
The Fair Work Commission certified the alterations to the Queensland Police Branch Rules of the Police Federation of Australia, confirming that they complied with the relevant legislation and were not contrary to any law. This decision effectively approved the changes to the organisation's rules, including the truncation of certain terms of office, as bona fide and lawful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.