Police Federation of Australia Australian Federal Police Association Branch v The Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police

Case [2024] FWC 1765


[2024] FWC 1765

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Police Federation of Australia - Australian Federal Police Association Branch
v

The Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police

(B2024/843)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 5 JULY 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police

  1. This is an application by the Police Federation of Australia - Australian Federal Police Association Branch (AFPA or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police (AFP or Employer).

  1. On 4 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application if amended to deal with certain considerations that arise from the nature of the parties and the employees concerned with this matter. The application has been amended by consent.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Alexander Caruana, President of the Australian Federal Police Association, setting out the steps taken by the AFPA in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by an eligible protected action ballot agent approved pursuant to s.468A of the Act, and named in the formal Order, and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. For reasons outlined below, the ballot agent has been identified as “BA” in the public version of the Order.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 19 July 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 5 working days applies to the items listed within Clause sixteen (16) of the Order made by the Commission. The default period of three working days will apply to the remaining forms of action arising from the ballot question.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR776723.

  1. Given the unique circumstances of this matter, a confidentiality term has been included in the Order. As a result, the Order has been published in a partially modified form with the full formal Order provided directly to the parties and the relevant ballot agent.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order, as agreed by the parties.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

< PR776724>

Details
AGLC
Police Federation of Australia Australian Federal Police Association Branch v The Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police [2024] FWC 1765
Case
[2024] FWC 1765
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Police Federation of Australia - Australian Federal Police Association Branch (AFPA or Applicant) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Federal Police (AFP or Employer). The application was amended by consent following the Employer's non-objection, provided that certain considerations arising from the nature of the parties and employees were addressed. The Deputy President, Hampton, decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the court included whether the application met the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act, including the notification time for the proposed agreement, and if the exceptional circumstances justified an extended period of written notice under section 443(5) of the Act. The court had to ensure that the ballot would be conducted by an eligible agent approved under section 468A of the Act and determine the closing date for voting.

The Deputy President, Hampton, concluded that the application met all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act, based on the material before the Commission, including the declaration of Alexander Caruana, President of the Australian Federal Police Association. The President's declaration outlined the steps taken by the AFPA in bargaining with the Employer and its genuine attempts to reach an agreement. The Commission was satisfied with the notification time and the steps taken to reach an agreement. The closing date for voting was set as 19 July 2024, and an extended notice period of 5 working days was determined for specific items listed in Clause sixteen of the Order. The default period of three working days applied to the remaining forms of action arising from the ballot question. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference.

The final orders included the approval of the ballot agent, the establishment of the closing date for voting, the determination of the notice periods, and the inclusion of confidentiality terms in the Order, which was partially modified for public release. The full formal Order was provided directly to the parties and the relevant ballot agent. Directions were issued to ensure the parties attended the conciliation conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.