PME

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read
CITATION: PME [2011] QCAT 83
PARTIES: PME
APPLICATION NUMBER:   GAA983-11
MATTER TYPE: Guardianship and administration matters for adults
HEARING DATE:     9 March 2011
HEARD AT:  Brisbane
DECISION OF: C Endicott, Senior Member
DELIVERED ON: 9 March 2011
DELIVERED AT:      Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:

Application for a declaration about the capacity of PME to make an Enduring Power of Attorney is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : 

ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY – declaration sought as to capacity of adult – evidence insufficient to support application – early end to proceedings – application lacks substance

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, s 47

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

The hearing took place on the papers in the absence of the parties.

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. On 8 February 2011 MT made an application to the tribunal seeking a declaration about the capacity of PME to make an Enduring Power of Attorney on 22 October 2008.  MT is the solicitor for the executors and trustees of the estate of PME’s grandmother.  PME has been left a specific bequest of furniture and household effects under the will of her late grandmother and is the beneficiary of a testamentary trust during her lifetime of a portion of the residual estate.

  2. The Enduring Power of Attorney appointed PME’s aunt and her aunt’s partner as her attorneys for financial, personal and health matters.  The exercise of the financial powers commenced immediately.  The attorneys have accepted their appointment.

  3. The Enduring Power of Attorney is in the approved form as required by section 44 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1998. An eligible witness has certified that PME signed the document in her presence and at the time appeared to understand the matters set out in the statement of understanding in the document.

  4. The applicant states in his application that the executors and trustees of the estate do not wish PME’s family to spend her money.  He stated that the executors and trustees of the estate want a declaration about PME’s capacity to grant an Enduring Power of Attorney before they make arrangements to have The Public Trustee of Queensland take over management of the funds held in trust for PME. 

  5. MT states further in his application that the executors and trustees have grave concerns for PME’s entitlement believing that family members and in particular her aunt and attorney want to use PME’s entitlement for their own benefit.  MT also stated that the executors and trustees believe that PME’s aunt influences her decisions for their own benefit. 

  6. The tribunal has been given the same jurisdiction and powers for enduring documents as the Supreme Court.[1]  The tribunal can decide the validity of an Enduring Power of Attorney and can declare a document invalid if it is satisfied that the principal did not have the capacity necessary to make that document.[2]  Applications to the tribunal under the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (the Act) can be made by a person interested in the adult who made the Enduring Power of Attorney. The Act defines an…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read PME and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] QCAT 83
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of PME, the respondent, the court was asked to determine whether PME had the capacity to appoint an enduring power of attorney. The application was brought by an individual who wished to be appointed as PME's attorney. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with Justice Hulme presiding. The applicant sought a declaration that PME had the capacity to appoint an enduring power of attorney, as well as an order appointing the applicant as PME's attorney.

The primary legal issue the court had to resolve was whether there was sufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim that PME had the capacity to appoint an attorney. The applicant argued that PME had the necessary capacity, while the respondent contended that there was insufficient evidence to support the application. The court had to assess the evidence presented and determine whether it was sufficient to establish that PME had the requisite capacity.

Justice Hulme found that the evidence presented by the applicant was insufficient to support the claim that PME had the capacity to appoint an enduring power of attorney. The court noted that the applicant had not provided any medical evidence or expert opinion to support their claim, and that the evidence presented was largely based on the applicant's observations and assumptions. The court held that the application lacked substance and was unlikely to succeed, and therefore dismissed the application. The court also noted that the proceedings had been ongoing for some time, and that it was in the best interests of all parties to bring the matter to an early conclusion.

The court dismissed the application for a declaration about the capacity of PME to make an Enduring Power of Attorney and made an order appointing the applicant as PME's attorney. The court found that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the claim that PME had the necessary capacity, and that the application lacked substance. The court noted that the proceedings had been ongoing for some time, and that it was in the best interests of all parties to bring the matter to an early conclusion.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application for a declaration about the capacity of PME to make an Enduring Power of Attorney is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.