| [2018] FWCA 4664 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Plascorp Pty Ltd
(AG2018/2748)
PLASCORP PTY LTD & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 9 AUGUST 2018 |
Application for approval of the Plascorp Pty Ltd & National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Plascorp Pty Ltd & National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Plascorp Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 August 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE429477 PR609791>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Plascorp Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 4664
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4664
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement had been made in good faith, whether it contained the minimum terms and conditions as prescribed by the Act, and whether it included appropriate dispute resolution procedures. The National Union of Workers argued that certain provisions of the agreement were not made in good faith and did not provide the required minimum terms. Conversely, Plascorp Pty Ltd contended that the agreement was fair and met all statutory requirements.
The Commission, after thorough examination, found that the agreement had indeed been made in good faith and included all the mandated minimum terms and conditions. The Commission also determined that the dispute resolution procedures were adequate. Therefore, the application for approval was successful. The agreement was approved under the Fair Work Act, and the terms became legally binding on both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.