Plaintiff S111/2017 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Case [2017] HCATrans 98


[2017] HCATrans 098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S111 of 2017

B e t w e e n -

PLAINTIFF S111/2017

Plaintiff

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION

Defendant

EDELMAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

FROM CANBERRA BY VIDEO LINK TO SYDNEY

ON TUESDAY, 9 MAY 2017, AT 9.30 AM

(Continued from 8/5/17)

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

HIS HONOUR:   This matter was heard by me yesterday in Canberra.  In this matter, I make the following orders:

1.Dismiss the summons for interlocutory orders.

2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the summons.

3.The matter be remitted to the Federal Court of Australia.

I publish my reasons. 

MR KLINE:   If your Honour pleases.

HIS HONOUR:   Adjourn the Court, please.

AT 9.31 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Details
AGLC
Plaintiff S111/2017 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCATrans 98
Case
[2017] HCATrans 98
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of Australia, in the matter of *Plaintiff S111/2017 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection*, heard proceedings concerning interlocutory orders sought by the applicant against the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection.

The court was required to determine whether to grant the interlocutory orders sought by the applicant, and to make consequential orders regarding costs and the future conduct of the matter.

His Honour dismissed the summons for interlocutory orders, ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the summons, and remitted the matter to the Federal Court of Australia. The reasons for these orders were published by the court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.