Plaintiff M166 v MIMA & Anor
[2007] HCATrans 113
•20 March 2007
[2007] HCATrans 113
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Melbourne No M166 of 2006
B e t w e e n -
PLAINTIFF M166 OF 2006
Plaintiff
and
THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Defendant
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Defendant
Application for order to show cause
HAYNE J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT MELBOURNE ON TUESDAY, 20 MARCH 2007, AT 9.30 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
MR W.S. MOSLEY: If your Honour pleases, I appear for the first respondent. (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
HIS HONOUR: Yes, Mr Mosley.
MR MOSELY: I do not believe there is going to be an appearance.
HIS HONOUR: Yes. Perhaps we should have the applicant called.
MR MOSELY: I should say this, your Honour, that I was just told in the lift coming up here that there is an affidavit of service that we rely upon of one Cindy Michelle Brown attesting to service of the summons and affidavit in support which should be on your Honour’s file.
HIS HONOUR: That is the affidavit of 15 March 2007?
MR MOSELY: Yes, it is, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, I have that.
MR MOSELY: But coming up in the lift with my instructor I was just handed this. It was marked “return to sender” which is presumably the letter which was sent to the applicant, but that it is his address, I believe, for service as given in his application. I should just check that, 5 Mitchell Street, Blackburn North, which is where the letter was sent to and where the deponent of the affidavit attests to it being sent.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
MR MOSELY: Does your Honour wish me to give you a chronology of matters? He did not attend at the directions hearing before Registrar Connard which led to the application in the Federal Magistrates Court on 6 December being dismissed.
HIS HONOUR: What do you say I should do with the application today?
MR MOSELY: We would seek that your Honour dismisses the matter for want of prosecution.
HIS HONOUR: Yes. Do you seek anything other than that?
MR MOSELY: Just an order for costs, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution. The plaintiff will pay the first defendant’s costs.
Is there any other order that you seek?
MR MOSELY: No, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, very well.
AT 9.36 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0