Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 3577


[2014] FWCA 3577

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd
(AG2014/1045)

BEAUARABA LIVING - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Aged care industry

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 28 MAY 2014

Application for approval of the Beauaraba Living - Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] On 6 May 2014 the Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Beauaraba Living - Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.

[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[4] The Australian Workers’ Union and the Queensland Nurses’ Union of Employees being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 4 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code {?}, AE408389  PR551155>

Details
AGLC
Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd [2014] FWCA 3577
Case
[2014] FWCA 3577
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd was the subject of an application for approval of the Beauaraba Living - Enterprise Agreement 2014. The parties involved in the dispute were the Pittsworth and District Hospital Friendly Society Ltd and the Queensland Nurses and Midwives' Union. The primary issue before the court was whether the terms of the proposed agreement met the necessary standards for approval under the applicable industrial relations laws. The court had to examine the fairness and compliance of the agreement with relevant industrial instruments and statutory requirements.

The legal issues addressed by the court included whether the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment in a fair and reasonable manner, and whether it complied with the necessary provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court also had to consider if the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it provided adequate protections for employees. Furthermore, the court needed to ensure that the agreement met the standards for approval as set out in the relevant legislation.

In reaching its decision, the court considered the submissions from both parties, the content of the proposed agreement, and relevant precedents. The court found that the agreement met the necessary standards for approval as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, was made in good faith, and complied with the relevant industrial instruments and statutory requirements. The court was satisfied that the agreement was fair and appropriate in all respects and thus approved the application for the agreement.

As a result of the court's decision, the Beauaraba Living - Enterprise Agreement 2014 was approved and is now in effect. The agreement provides for the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by it, and the parties are bound by its terms. The decision of the court is final and binding on the parties involved in the dispute.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.