DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Pidgeon v Saverin [2003] QDC 457
PARTIES:
ELAINE FAY PIDGEON
Applicant
v
RODNEY JOHN SAVERN
RespondentFILE NO:
BD 3397/03
DIVISION:
Civil Jurisdiction
PROCEEDING:
Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
23 December 2003
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
18 December 2003
JUDGE:
Hoath DCJ
ORDER:
[1] I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $7,500 by way of criminal compensation for injury received as a result of the offence of stalking of which the respondent was convicted on 5 June 2002 and sentenced on 7 November 2002.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL COMPENSATION
COUNSEL:
SOLICITORS:
Howden Saggers Lawyers for the Applicant
This is an application by Elaine Fay Pidgeon for criminal compensation pursuant to s 24 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 for injury suffered as a result of the offence of stalking committed upon her by the respondent between 13 February and 12 August 2001.
The applicant is presently 43 years of age. She first met the respondent in 1994. At the time the respondent was friend of her then de factor husband. The respondent became a friend of the applicant and her children and lived in the applicant’s home on two separate occasions in 1995 and 1997. There was no romantic association between the applicant and the respondent.
The offence of stalking commenced on 14 February 2001 when the respondent sent the applicant a bunch of flowers and a St Valentine Day’s card. The St Valentine Day’s card was offensive and the applicant told the respondent that she had no interest in him and no longer wanted his friendship.
The respondent claimed that what had occurred was a joke and tried to resume the friendship. He repeatedly telephoned the applicant, left messages for her, wrote letters to her and parked his car outside and drove his car past her residence. That conduct continued despite the applicant continually informing the respondent that she had no interest in him until 11 August 2001 when the applicant moved her place of residence.
On the day the applicant was moving there was concern that the respondent would attempt to follow the removalist’s vehicle to see where she was moving to. There was an incident that day involving the applicant’s son and the respondent following which the respondent was charged with dangerous driving and the offence of stalking which is the subject of the present application.
On 7 November 2002 the respondent was sentenced to one month’s imprisonment wholly suspended following his conviction on the count of stalking. At the same time an order was made restraining any contact by the respondent with the applicant. Since 11 August 2001 there has been no contact between the applicant and the respondent.
On 10 June 2003 the applicant was seen by Mr Jeffery Grantham, a clinical and forensic psychologist for the purpose of preparing a report for this application. After setting out in some detail the applicant’s personal background, the circumstances of the stalking and the consequences of the…
Continue reading Pidgeon v Saverin
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Pidgeon v Saverin [2003] QDC 457
- Case
- [2003] QDC 457
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining the appropriate level of compensation based on the injuries and the impact they had on the applicant's life. This required a careful assessment of the evidence presented regarding the physical and psychological harm suffered by the applicant. The court also had to consider statutory provisions and relevant case law to ensure the compensation was fair and just.
After considering the evidence and applicable law, the court concluded that the applicant was entitled to compensation of $7,500 for the injuries received. The court found that this amount appropriately reflected the harm suffered and was in line with established legal principles and precedents. The decision was based on a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the stalking on the applicant’s well-being and the statutory framework for criminal compensation.
The court ordered the respondent to pay the applicant the sum of $7,500 by way of criminal compensation for the injury received as a result of the stalking offence. This order was made to provide the applicant with appropriate redress for the harm suffered.
Orders
Orders of the court
[1] I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $7,500 by way of criminal compensation for injury received as a result of the offence of stalking of which the respondent was convicted on 5 June 2002 and sentenced on 7 November 2002.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.