Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2011] AATA 385
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2009/2230
VETERAN'S APPEALS DIVISION ) Re IAN PICKERING Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Brigadier C. Emert (Retd), Member
Dr K. J. Breen, AM, MemberDate6 June 2011
PlaceMelbourne
Decision The decision under review is set aside. In its place the Tribunal decides that:
1. Mr Pickering’s psychiatric conditions are properly diagnosed as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive disorder;
2. the PTSD is war-caused; and
3. the depressive disorder is not war-caused.
.................[signed].....................
Member
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS – operational service in Vietnam – depressive disorder – whether depressive disorder war-caused – four stages of Deledio reasoning ‑ hypothesis connecting conditions with operational service ‑ Statements of Principles ‑ satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that depressive disorder not war-caused
Pickering and Repatriation Commission [2011] AATA 58
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82
REASONS FOR DECISION
6 June 2011 Brigadier C. Emert (Retd), Member
Dr K. J. Breen, AM, Member1.On 4 February 2011 the Tribunal handed down its interim decision in this matter, setting aside the decision under review and deciding that Mr Pickering’s psychiatric conditions are properly diagnosed as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Depressive Disorder and that the PTSD is war-caused (see Pickering and Repatriation Commission [2011] AATA 58). The Tribunal will now determine whether Mr Pickering’s Depressive Disorder is also war-caused.
SUBMISSIONS
2. The applicant’s final submissions dated 28 April 2011 contend that the evidence before the Tribunal supports a finding that his Depressive Disorder is war-caused. This contention is supported by Dr Hassan’s evidence. In her oral evidence, Dr Hassan said it’s incredibly common to get depressed when you have PTSD … [i]t’s a very, very common post-comorbid diagnosis. I think absolutely he suffered from depression. The applicant also referred to the Tribunal’s earlier findings that Mr Pickering suffered a life-threatening event during his operational service in Vietnam and that he displayed symptoms consistent with PTSD soon after he returned from Vietnam.
3. The applicant contends that the evidence and findings satisfy factor 6(a)(ii) of the Statement of Principles concerning Depressive Disorder (Instrument N° 27 of 2008 as amended by N° 40 of 2010) (the SoP) which requires the onset of the symptoms of Depressive Disorder occur within five years of the stressor. The applicant also contends that factor 6(a)(vii), which requires him to have a clinically significant psychiatric disorder prior to the onset of the Depressive Disorder, is satisfied.
4. In written submissions dated 29 April 2011 the respondent contends that factor 6(a)(ii) of the SoP is not satisfied, as the clinical onset of the Depressive Disorder was not until the 1990s, which is beyond the five year period specified. The respondent refers to the evidence of Dr White, Dr Carter, Dr Mock, Mr Reid and Mrs Pickering and submits that the evidence does not point to the presence until the 1990s of all of the symptoms required by the SoP…
Continue reading PICKERING and REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- PICKERING and REPATRIATION COMMISSION [2011] AATA 385
- Case
- [2011] AATA 385
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including expert psychiatric opinions, and the relevant statutory provisions governing the determination of war-caused psychiatric conditions. The court examined the criteria for establishing the causation of psychiatric conditions and the distinction between PTSD and depressive disorder. It found that the evidence supported the diagnosis of Mr. Pickering's conditions as PTSD and depressive disorder, and further determined that the PTSD was indeed war-caused. However, the court concluded that the depressive disorder was not attributable to Mr. Pickering's military service.
The Federal Court set aside the previous decision and made its own findings, confirming that Mr. Pickering's PTSD was war-caused while his depressive disorder was not. This decision was based on the weight of the evidence and the applicable legal standards for causation in the context of war-related psychiatric conditions. The court's ruling was grounded in a careful analysis of the psychiatric evidence and the statutory framework governing the claims process. The orders of the court required the Repatriation Commission to recognise Mr. Pickering's PTSD as war-caused, while denying the same causation for his depressive disorder.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is set aside. In its place the Tribunal decides that:
1. Mr Pickering’s psychiatric conditions are properly diagnosed as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive disorder;
2. the PTSD is war-caused; and
3. the depressive disorder is not war-caused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.