Philip Reimers v Safari Automotive Pty Ltd T/A Safari Automotive Pty Ltd

Case

[2014] FWC 1792

18 MARCH 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 1792

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 18 March 2014.

The following change has been made:

    ● In paragraph [1] reference to s.569 has been corrected to read s.596 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

Michelle Reynolds

Associate to Commissioner Bissett

Dated: 25 March 2014

[2014] FWC 1792

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Philip Reimers
v
Safari Automotive Pty Ltd T/A Safari Automotive Pty Ltd
(U2013/15371)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 18 MARCH 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal - permission to be represented by a lawyer or a paid agent.

[1] On 7 March 2014 the Respondent’s representative gave notice that it would seek permission pursuant to s.596 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to represent the Respondent in the hearing of the above application scheduled for 20-21 March 2014.

[2] On 11 March 2014 I issued directions for the filing of submissions by the Respondent (12 March 2014) and the Applicant (14 March 2014) with respect to the application for permission to represent the Respondent in the hearing. This would enable the question of permission to be resolved prior to the hearing date.

[3] The Respondent filed written submissions in accordance with the directions issued. The Applicant made no submissions.

Legislation

[4] Section 596 of the Act states:

    596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

    (1) Except as provided by subsection (3) or the procedural rules, a person may be represented in a matter before the FWC (including by making an application or submission to the FWC on behalf of the person) by a lawyer or paid agent only with the permission of the FWC.

    (2) The FWC may grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC only if:

      (a) it would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter; or

      (b) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented because the person is unable to represent himself, herself or itself effectively; or

      (c) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented taking into account fairness between the person and other persons in the same matter.

    Note: Circumstances in which the FWC might grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent include the following:

      (a) where a person is from a non English speaking background or has difficulty reading or writing;

      (b) where a small business is a party to a matter and has no specialist human resources staff while the other party is represented by an officer or employee of an industrial association or another person with experience in workplace relations advocacy.

Conclusion

[5] The Respondent submits that, on the basis of the materials filed by each party to the matter, there is a fundamental factual conflict between the parties concerning the circumstances relating to the Applicant’s employment and the reasons for the termination of his employment. The resolution of this dispute will involve issues of witness credibility and will require substantial matters to be put to witnesses. The Respondent also submits that it will maintain an objection to some of the material the Applicant has indicated he will seek to file in the matter.

[6] In addition the Respondent submits that the employer is a small business that has no human resource or legal expertise within the company.

[7] On the basis of the submissions of the Respondent, my reading of the material filed by the parties, the number of witnesses and the contested nature of the proceedings, I am satisfied that it will enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently if permission to be represented is granted to the Respondent. I am fortified in this view by the number of requests already made by both parties for orders to be issued for the production of documents and persons to attend the proceedings.

[8] Permission is therefore granted to the Respondent to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent.

COMMISSIONER

Final written submissions:

Respondent, 12 March 2014.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR548704>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0