O'DRISCOLL v J Ray McDermott, SA
[2006] WASCA 25
Citation 1
…nging the action was 3 years from the time that the plaintiff became aware or could reasonably have become aware of the decision of the High Court in Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503, or alternatively, Regie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (2002) 210 CLR 491. 2. The Learned Judge erred in law by ordering summar…
SRSC v Beaumont
[2004] NSWSC 164
Citation 2
…Damages, 17th ed. @ 503-504 Merivale v Carson (1888) 20 QBD 275 O'Brien v McKean (1968-69) 118 CLR 540 Perkins v NSW Land Council (1998) 45 NSWLR 340 Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 Rabelias Pty Limited v Cameron 95 ATC 4552 Refjek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Limited (2003) 201 ALR 784 Ro…
Commissioner of Taxes v Tourism Holdings Ltd
[2002] NTCA 10
Citation 3
(Para 8)
…uestions of retrospectivity, the High Court has offered some guidance on the nature of legislation providing for limitation periods. In Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 172 ALR 625 at p 651, Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Hayes JJ held: … matters that affect the existence, extent or enforceability of the rights or duties…
Tourism Holdings Ltd v Commissioner of Taxes
[2002] NTSC 1
Citation 4
(Para 5)
…rather than questions of retrospectivity, the High Court has offered some guidance on the nature of legislation providing for limitation periods. In Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 172 ALR 625 at p 651, Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Hayes JJ held: “… matters that affect the existence, extent or enforceability of the ri…
Henry v Commonwealth
[2001] NSWSC 971
Citation 5
…Limitation Act 1981 (NT) Commonwealth Employees' Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 Freedom of Information Act (1982) (as amended) CASES CITED: Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 172 625 at 651 Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 197 CLR 29 Commonwealth of Australia v Mewett (1997) 191 CL…
Tanks v WorkCover Queensland
[2001] QCA 103
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…of action. [3]As to the second of these, see Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 at 268. Substantive provisions were arguably defined more broadly in Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) 172 ALR 625 at 651 but the difference, if any, is, for present purposes immaterial.…
Kynaston v Fink International Pty Ltd
[2015] VCC 1182
Citation 7
…[26]T58, Pfeiffer v Rogerson (2000) HCA 36…