Peynirci & Agani

Case [2024] FedCFamC1F 27


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

Peynirci & Agani [2024] FedCFamC1F 27

File number(s): BRC 1479 of 2022
Judgment of: HOGAN J
Date of judgment: 25 January 2024
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Requirements of s 102NA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ordered to apply
Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

Family Law Amendment (Family Violence and Cross-examination of Parties) Act 2018 (Cth)

Cases cited: Hurley v Melton (No 2) (2020) 61 Fam LR 405; [2020] FamCA 917
Division: First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 4
Date of hearing: 25 January 2024
Place: Brisbane
Solicitor for the Applicant: Litigant in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: M.A. Kent & Associates
Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: VM Family Law

ORDERS

BRC 1479 of 2022

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MR PEYNIRCI

Applicant

AND:

MS AGANI

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

HOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

25 JANUARY 2024

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to s 102NA(1)(c)(iv) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) the requirements of s 102NA(2) of the Act are to apply to the cross-examination of each of the parties in these proceedings.

2.The Independent Children’s Lawyer has leave for Ms B, Court Child Expert, to give evidence and be cross-examined by video-link through Microsoft Teams at the final hearing of this matter. 

3.Such leave is conditional upon Ms B being informed that she is:

(a)to be in a private place when she is called to give evidence;  and

(b)to have with her a copy of her affidavit/s or report/s;  and

(c)to have with her any notes that maybe in her possession that relate to the proceedings; and

(d)have available to her a method by which she can receive, electronically, any documentation that any party may wish her to be shown during the course of cross-examination.

4.The time for compliance with Order 8 of the Order made on 30 November 2023 is extended such that by 4.00 pm on 9 February 2024, each party file and serve any affidavit material on which they intend to rely at the final hearing.

5.The matter is listed for a pre-trial case management hearing at 9:15 am on 20 February 2024, with the hearing to be conducted by telephone.

IT IS NOTED THAT:

A.Given that s 102NA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) applies, the Court has today advised the parties that:

(i)pursuant to those requirements, neither party may cross-examine the other party personally;  and

(ii)pursuant to those requirements, any cross-examination of either party may only be conducted by a legal practitioner acting on behalf of the other party;  and

(iii)they are able to apply to the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross‑Examination of Parties Scheme for the provision of a lawyer by completing an application form available by accessing …@...;  and

(iv)a copy of these Orders will be provided by the Court to Legal Aid Queensland, which administers the said Scheme in Queensland.

B.The Court respectfully requests…

Continue reading Peynirci & Agani

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Peynirci & Agani [2024] FedCFamC1F 27
Case
[2024] FedCFamC1F 27
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Mr Peynirci sought various orders concerning his children with Ms Agani. The primary issue before the court was whether certain procedural requirements under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) should apply to the cross-examination of both parties, particularly in relation to the evidence of an expert witness, Ms B. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the Independent Children’s Lawyer should be allowed to call Ms B as an expert witness and if so, under what conditions this testimony should be given. The court also considered the timeline for the filing of affidavits and the scheduling of a pre-trial case management hearing.

The court examined the statutory provisions under s 102NA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and concluded that the requirements of s 102NA(2) should indeed apply to the cross-examination of both parties. This was deemed necessary to ensure a fair and just examination of the evidence in the proceedings. The court granted leave for the Independent Children’s Lawyer to call Ms B as an expert witness, but stipulated that this testimony must be given via video-link through Microsoft Teams. The court emphasised that Ms B must be in a private place, have all relevant documents and notes at hand, and be equipped to receive any documentation electronically during the cross-examination. Furthermore, the court extended the time for filing affidavit material and scheduled a pre-trial case management hearing to ensure that all procedural matters were adequately addressed before the final hearing.

The court's orders included the application of specific procedural requirements to the cross-examination of both parties, permission for the Independent Children’s Lawyer to call Ms B as an expert witness via video-link, and an extension of the deadline for filing affidavit material. These measures were intended to facilitate a thorough and fair examination of the evidence in the proceedings. The matter was scheduled for a pre-trial case management hearing to ensure all procedural aspects were properly managed.

In conclusion, the court's orders addressed the procedural requirements for the cross-examination of the parties and the expert witness, extended the time for filing affidavits, and set a date for a pre-trial case management hearing. These decisions aimed to ensure a fair and efficient process leading up to the final hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

BRC 1479 of 2022

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MR PEYNIRCI

Applicant

AND:

MS AGANI

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

HOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

25 JANUARY 2024

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Pursuant to s 102NA(1)(c)(iv) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) the requirements of s 102NA(2) of the Act are to apply to the cross-examination of each of the parties in these proceedings.

2. The Independent Children’s Lawyer has leave for Ms B, Court Child Expert, to give evidence and be cross-examined by video-link through Microsoft Teams at the final hearing of this matter.

3. Such leave is conditional upon Ms B being informed that she is:

(a) to be in a private place when she is called to give evidence; and

(b) to have with her a copy of her affidavit/s or report/s; and

(c) to have with her any notes that maybe in her possession that relate to the proceedings; and

(d) have available to her a method by which she can receive, electronically, any documentation that any party may wish her to be shown during the course of cross-examination.

4. The time for compliance with Order 8 of the Order made on 30 November 2023 is extended such that by 4.00 pm on 9 February 2024, each party file and serve any affidavit material on which they intend to rely at the final hearing.

5. The matter is listed for a pre-trial case management hearing at 9:15 am on 20 February 2024, with the hearing to be conducted by telephone.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.