Petrovski v Nasev; The Estate of Janakievska

Case

[2011] NSWSC 1275

17 November 2011


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Petrovski v Nasev; The Estate of Janakievska [2011] NSWSC 1275 [2011] NSWSC 1275 17 November 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Petrovski v Nasev; The Estate of Janakievska involved a dispute over the validity of a will executed by the deceased. The deceased had made two wills, one in 1999 and another in 2004. There was no dispute that the 1999 will was duly executed and valid. The sole issue before the court was whether the 2004 will was valid and should be admitted to probate. If the 2004 will was valid, it would revoke the 1999 will. The central questions concerning the validity of the 2004 will were whether the deceased validly executed it, whether she had testamentary capacity, and whether the will was produced as a consequence of undue influence. A late amendment was made to assert that the deceased lacked knowledge and approval of the 2004 will.

The court had to determine whether the deceased validly executed the 2004 will, considering the legal requirements for executing a will. The court also had to consider whether the deceased had testamentary capacity at the time she executed the 2004 will. This involved assessing the deceased's mental state and understanding of the nature and effect of making a will. The court also had to examine whether the will was the result of undue influence, meaning that the deceased was coerced or pressured into making the will against her own free will. Additionally, the court had to consider the late amendment to assert the deceased's lack of knowledge and approval of the 2004 will and determine whether this was a valid argument.

The court found that the deceased did not validly execute the 2004 will. The court held that the deceased did not have the necessary testamentary capacity at the time she executed the 2004 will. The court also found that the will was produced as a consequence of undue influence. The court rejected the late amendment asserting the deceased's lack of knowledge and approval of the 2004 will. As a result, the 2004 will was not admitted to probate, and the 1999 will remained valid. The estate was to be distributed according to the terms of the 1999 will.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Succession Law

Legal Concepts

  • Testamentary Capacity

  • Undue Influence

  • Wills

  • Revival of Wills

  • Probate

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Dunne v Christie [2025] NSWSC 968

Cases Citing This Decision

104

Peacock v Knox [2025] NSWCA 160
Wild v Meduri [2024] NSWCA 230
Cases Cited

21

Statutory Material Cited

4

Nicholson v Knaggs [2009] VSC 64
Revie v Druitt [2005] NSWSC 902