Pethybridge v D'Orsa

Case [2010] VSC 90


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT BENDIGO

COMMON LAW DIVISION

No. 30 of 2009

MALCOLM CARL PETHYBRIDGE Plaintiff
v
JAMES D’ORSA Defendant

---

JUDGE:

VICKERY J

WHERE HELD:

BENDIGO AND MELBOURNE

DATES  OF HEARING:

22–26 FEBRUARY (BENDIGO),

1–3 MARCH (MELBOURNE) 2010

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

26 MARCH 2010

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

PETHYBRIDGE v D’ORSA

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2010] VSC 90

---

NEGLIGENCE – Motor vehicle accident – Driving negligently on public highway – Motor car towing horse float driven by Defendant on wrong side of highway – Collision with motor bike ridden by Plaintiff on correct side of highway – No contributory negligence – Personal injuries – Claim for loss of future earning capacity a speculative claim not giving rise to compensation on the claimed basis.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Plaintiff Mr J B Richards  SC and
Mr A D B Ingram
Rogers & Every
For the Defendants Mr M R Titshall QC and
Mr A J Mc G Moulds
Solicitor to the Transport Accident Commission

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1

The Litigation................................................................................................................................. 1
Mr Pethybridge............................................................................................................................. 2
Dr D’Orsa....................................................................................................................................... 3

THE COLLISION............................................................................................................................... 4

Road Conditions............................................................................................................................ 4
Events Leading to the Collision.................................................................................................. 5

Mr Pethybridge.......................................................................................................................... 5

Dr D’Orsa................................................................................................................................. 7

The Collision.................................................................................................................................. 9
Physical Indicia.............................................................................................................................. 9

Motor Cycle............................................................................................................................... 9
Horse Float............................................................................................................................... 10
Leather Vest............................................................................................................................. 11
Witnesses Attending the Scene................................................................................................ 11
Gouge Mark(s)......................................................................................................................... 12
Brake Fluid............................................................................................................................... 13
Scrape Mark............................................................................................................................. 14
Mirror...................................................................................................................................... 15
Plastic Item.............................................................................................................................. 16
Conclusions Derived from Physical Indicia............................................................................ 16
Expert Opinion........................................................................................................................ 17

Assessment of Liability.............................................................................................................. 17

DAMAGES........................................................................................................................................ 22

Pain and Suffering Damages..................................................................................................... 25

History of Treatment............................................................................................................... 25
Long Term Disabilities Caused by the Accident..................................................................... 26
Medical Evidence..................................................................................................................... 30
Dr Douglas Li.......................................................................................................................... 30
Dr  Hary Wisjaja..................................................................................................................... 31
Dr John Anstee......................................................................................................................... 33
Dr Sutcliffe – Total and Permanent Unfitness for Future Employment................................ 35
Dr Eisen - Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Infection........................ 39
Dr Marshall............................................................................................................................. 40
Dr Elder................................................................................................................................... 41
Dr Dooley................................................................................................................................. 44
Conclusion and Assessment of Pain and Suffering Damages................................................. 50

Claim for Loss of Earnings and Future Earning Capacity.................................................... 50

Defendant’s Submissions......................................................................................................... 53
Loss of Opportunity................................................................................................................. 55
Assessment of Loss of Past Earnings and Future Earning Capacity...................................... 56

Conclusion and Orders.............................................................................................................. 58

HIS HONOUR:

INTRODUCTION

The Litigation

  1. In this proceeding the Plaintiff, Malcolm Carl Pethybridge (“Mr Pethybridge”), claims damages for personal injuries and loss of past earnings and future earning capacity arising from a transport accident which occurred on 14 January 2006 on the Maroondah Highway at Narbethong Victoria.  The accident (the “accident”) occurred on a stretch of roadway known as the “Black Spur” when there was a collision between a horse float being towed by the Defendant, James D’Orsa (“Dr D’Orsa”) and a motor cycle being ridden by Mr Pethybridge (“the collision”).

  1. It is alleged by Mr Pethybridge that the collision was caused by the negligence of Dr D’Orsa in the driving, management and control of the motor vehicle which he was driving and the horse float which he was towing.  The essence of the Plaintiff’s case is that the Defendant drove his motor vehicle…

Continue reading Pethybridge v D'Orsa

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Pethybridge v D'Orsa [2010] VSC 90
Case
[2010] VSC 90
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pethybridge v D'Orsa is a case involving the plaintiff, Pethybridge, who suffered personal injuries in a motor vehicle accident caused by the defendant, D'Orsa. The accident occurred when D'Orsa, while driving a motor car towing a horse float, negligently drove on the wrong side of a public highway and collided with the plaintiff's motor bike, which was being ridden on the correct side of the road. The plaintiff did not contribute to the accident, and the case was brought before the court to determine the liability of D'Orsa and the extent of damages to be awarded.

The legal issues the court was required to decide involved establishing whether D'Orsa was negligent in driving on the wrong side of the road, and if so, whether Pethybridge's injuries were a direct result of this negligence. Additionally, the court had to determine the extent of damages to be awarded to Pethybridge, specifically if his claim for loss of future earning capacity was valid. The court also needed to address whether Pethybridge's claim for damages was speculative and not deserving of compensation.

In reaching its decision, the court found that D'Orsa was indeed negligent in driving on the wrong side of the road, resulting in the collision and subsequent injuries to Pethybridge. However, the court determined that Pethybridge's claim for loss of future earning capacity was speculative and not based on a reasonable probability. As a result, the court found that Pethybridge's claim for damages on this basis was not valid and did not warrant compensation. The court awarded damages to Pethybridge for the injuries sustained in the accident, but did not grant compensation for the speculative claim of loss of future earning capacity.

The final orders of the court were that D'Orsa was liable for the motor vehicle accident and was to pay damages to Pethybridge for the injuries suffered. However, the court did not award compensation for the speculative claim of loss of future earning capacity. The decision in this case highlights the importance of establishing a reasonable probability for speculative claims and the need for evidence-based claims in personal injury cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.